Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mridul Muralidharan

dblp:57/4093 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 89% Web and social media mining · 7% Recommender systems · 4%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › search interfaces
faceted search
0.222010
Faceted exploration of image search results · WWW 2010
Machine learned ranking of entity facets · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
facet ranking
0.112010
Faceted exploration of image search results · WWW 2010
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.112010
Faceted exploration of image search results · WWW 2010
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.112010
Machine learned ranking of entity facets · SIGIR 2010
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112010
Faceted exploration of image search results · WWW 2010
Information retrieval
search engines
0.112010
Faceted exploration of image search results · WWW 2010
Information retrieval › relevance feedback
click feedback
0.012010
Machine learned ranking of entity facets · SIGIR 2010
Recommender systems
click-through rate prediction
0.012010
Machine learned ranking of entity facets · SIGIR 2010
Web and social media mining
social tagging
0.012010
Faceted exploration of image search results · WWW 2010
Web and social media mining
user-generated content
0.012010
Faceted exploration of image search results · WWW 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.1query log analysis · 0.1gradient boosted decision trees · 0.1click-over-expected-clicks · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Machine learned ranking of entity facets
abstract
The research described in this paper forms the backbone of a service that enables the faceted search experience of the Yahoo! search engine. We introduce an approach for a machine learned ranking of entity facets based on user click feedback and features extracted from three different ranking sources. The objective of the learned model is to predict the click-through rate on an entity facet. In an empirical evaluation we compare the performance of gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT) against a linear combination of features on two different click feedback models using the raw click-through rate (CTR), and click over expected clicks (COEC). The results show a significant improvement in retrieval performance, in terms of discounted cumulated gain, when ranking entity facets with GBDT trained on the COEC model. Most notably this is true when evaluated against the CTR test set.
Roelof van Zwol, Lluís Garcia Pueyo, Mridul Muralidharan, Börkur Sigurbjörnsson
SIGIR3
2010 Faceted exploration of image search results
abstract
This paper describes MediaFaces, a system that enables faceted exploration of media collections. The system processes semi-structured information sources to extract objects and facets, e.g. the relationships between two objects. Next, we rank the facets based on a statistical analysis of image search query logs, and the tagging behaviour of users annotating photos in Flickr. For a given object of interest, we can then retrieve the top-k most relevant facets and present them to the user. The system is currently deployed in production by Yahoo!'s image search engine1. We present the system architecture, its main components, and the application of the system as part of the image search experience.
Roelof van Zwol, Börkur Sigurbjörnsson, Ramu Adapala, Lluís Garcia Pueyo, Abhinav Katiyar, Kaushal Kurapati, Mridul Muralidharan, Sudar Muthu, Vanessa Murdock 0001, Polly Ng, Anand Ramani, Anuj Sahai, Sriram Thiru Sathish, Hari Vasudev, Upendra Vuyyuru
WWW7