Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Munder

dblp:57/5085 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 78% Video understanding and tracking · 22%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
pedestrian detection
0.122007
Multi-cue Pedestrian Detection and Tracking from a Moving Vehicle · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2007
An Experimental Study on Pedestrian Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
person tracking
0.112007
Multi-cue Pedestrian Detection and Tracking from a Moving Vehicle · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2007
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112006
An Experimental Study on Pedestrian Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › pedestrian detection
pedestrian classification
0.112006
An Experimental Study on Pedestrian Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-cue detection and tracking · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1neural network · 0.1local receptive field · 0.1k-nearest neighbors · 0.1haar wavelet · 0.1boosting · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Pedestrian Detection and Tracking Using a Mixture of View-Based Shape-Texture Models
abstract
This paper presents a robust multicue approach to the integrated detection and tracking of pedestrians in a cluttered urban environment. A novel spatiotemporal object representation is proposed, which combines a generative shape model and a discriminative texture classifier, both of which are composed of a mixture of pose-specific submodels. Shape is represented by a set of linear subspace models, which is an extension of point distribution models, with shape transitions being modeled by a first-order Markov process. Texture, i.e., the shape-normalized intensity pattern, is represented by a manifold that is implicitly delimited by a set of pattern classifiers, whereas texture transition is modeled by a random walk. Direct 3-D measurements that are provided by a stereo system are further incorporated into the observation density function. We employ a Bayesian framework based on particle filtering to achieve integrated object detection and tracking. Large-scale experiments that involve pedestrian detection and tracking from a moving vehicle demonstrate the benefit of the proposed approach.
Stefan Munder, Christoph Schnörr, Dariu Gavrila
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.1
2007 Multi-cue Pedestrian Detection and Tracking from a Moving Vehicle
Dariu Gavrila, Stefan Munder
Int. J. Comput. Vis.2
2006 An Experimental Study on Pedestrian Classification
abstract
Detecting people in images is key for several important application domains in computer vision. This paper presents an in-depth experimental study on pedestrian classification; multiple feature-classifier combinations are examined with respect to their ROC performance and efficiency. We investigate global versus local and adaptive versus nonadaptive features, as exemplified by PCA coefficients, Haar wavelets, and local receptive fields (LRFs). In terms of classifiers, we consider the popular Support Vector Machines (SVMs), feed-forward neural networks, and k-nearest neighbor classifier. Experiments are performed on a large data set consisting of 4,000 pedestrian and more than 25,000 nonpedestrian (labeled) images captured in outdoor urban environments. Statistically meaningful results are obtained by analyzing performance variances caused by varying training and test sets. Furthermore, we investigate how classification performance and training sample size are correlated. Sample size is adjusted by increasing the number of manually labeled training data or by employing automatic bootstrapping or cascade techniques. Our experiments show that the novel combination of SVMs with LRF features performs best. A boosted cascade of Haar wavelets can, however, reach quite competitive results, at a fraction of computational cost. The data set used in this paper is made public, establishing a benchmark for this important problem.
Stefan Munder, Dariu Gavrila
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1