Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Björn Rasch

dblp:58/8267 · also Björn H. Rasch · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-7607-3415ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 44% Health and well-being technologies · 44% Interaction techniques and input · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Health and well-being technologies › cognitive support
memory support
0.712023
Olfactory Wearables for Mobile Targeted Memory Reactivation · CHI 2023
Interaction techniques and input › mobile interaction
mobile interface design
0.212023
Olfactory Wearables for Mobile Targeted Memory Reactivation · CHI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

within-subjects experiment · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Olfactory Wearables for Mobile Targeted Memory Reactivation
abstract
This paper investigates how a smartphone-controlled olfactory wearable might improve memory recall. We conducted a within-subjects experiment with 32 participants using the device and without (control). In the experimental condition, bursts of odor were released during visuo-spatial memory navigation tasks, and replayed during sleep the following night in the subjects’ home. We found that compared to control, there was an improvement in memory performance when using the scent wearable in memory tasks that involved walking in a physical space. Furthermore, participants recalled more objects and translations when re-exposed to the same scent during the recall test, in addition to during sleep. These effects were statistically significant, and, in the object recall task, they also persisted for more than one week. This experiment demonstrates a potential practical application of olfactory interfaces that can interact with a user during wake as well as sleep to support memory.
Judith Amores, Nirmita Mehra, Björn Rasch, Pattie Maes
CHI3