Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roger D. H. Warburton

dblp:59/1330 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software effort estimation
0.011983
Managing and Predicting the Costs of Real-Time Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983
Empirical software engineering
software project management
0.011983
Managing and Predicting the Costs of Real-Time Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded software
embedded applications
0.011983
Managing and Predicting the Costs of Real-Time Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time software
0.011983
Managing and Predicting the Costs of Real-Time Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

staffing curve analysis · 0.0putnam model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Managing and Predicting the Costs of Real-Time Software
abstract
The Putnam model can be used to predict and manage software development projects. It is a management tool that takes, as input, easily obtained manpower data and produces cost and schedule estimates. This paper examines data from two real-time software projects and analyzes the applicability of the Putnam model. We propose a variation ation of the model which more reliably follows the staffing curve of real-time software applications. A critical analysis of the assumptions is presented and the parameters are reinterpreted so that they reflect the environment of embedded applications. Two projects are analyzed from actual data. It is shown how management decisions are reflected in the model. Even erratic and incomplete data can yield valuable conclusions. It is also shown that the model is appropriate to software developed with modern practices. We show how valuable management information can be obtained by laying out the data in a systematic manner.
Roger D. H. Warburton
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1