Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mostefa Golea

dblp:59/2498 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 7 first-authorTheory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 68% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 21% Efficient and distributed learning · 10%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree learning
0.011997
Generalization in Decision Trees and DNF: Does Size Matter? · NIPS 1997
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
DNF learning
0.011997
Generalization in Decision Trees and DNF: Does Size Matter? · NIPS 1997
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.011997
Generalization in Decision Trees and DNF: Does Size Matter? · NIPS 1997
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
perceptron
0.021993
On Learning µ-Perceptron Networks with Binary Weights · NIPS 1992
Average Case Analysis of the Clipped Hebb Rule for Nonoverlapping Perception Networks · COLT 1993
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational complexity
average-case analysis
0.011993
Average Case Analysis of the Clipped Hebb Rule for Nonoverlapping Perception Networks · COLT 1993
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › low-precision computation › low-precision neural network
binary weight networks
0.011992
On Learning µ-Perceptron Networks with Binary Weights · NIPS 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hebb rule · 0.0average-case analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Generalization Error of Combined Classifiers
Llew Mason, Peter L. Bartlett, Mostefa Golea
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.3
1998 The truth will come to light: directions and challenges in extracting the knowledge embedded within trained artificial neural networks
abstract
To date, the preponderance of techniques for eliciting the knowledge embedded in trained artificial neural networks (ANN's) has focused primarily on extracting rule-based explanations from feedforward ANN's. The ADT taxonomy for categorizing such techniques was proposed in 1995 to provide a basis for the systematic comparison of the different approaches. This paper shows that not only is this taxonomy applicable to a cross section of current techniques for extracting rules from trained feedforward ANN's but also how the taxonomy can be adapted and extended to embrace a broader range of ANN types (e.g., recurrent neural networks) and explanation structures. In addition the paper identifies some of the key research questions in extracting the knowledge embedded within ANN's including the need for the formulation of a consistent theoretical basis for what has been, until recently, a disparate collection of empirical results.
Alan B. Tickle, Robert Andrews 0001, Mostefa Golea, Joachim Diederich
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks3
1997 Generalization in Decision Trees and DNF: Does Size Matter?
Mostefa Golea, Peter L. Bartlett, Wee Sun Lee, Llew Mason
NIPS1
1996 On learning ?-perceptron networks on the uniform distribution
Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand, Thomas R. Hancock
Neural Networks1
1994 Average Case Analysis of an Hebb-Type Rule that Finds the Network Connectivity
abstract
We describe an Hebb-type algorithm for learning unions of nonoverlapping perceptrons with binary weights. Two perceptrons are said to be nonoverlapping if they do not share any input variables. The learning algorithm is able to find both the network architecture and the weight values necessary to represent the target function. Moreover, the algorithm is local, homogeneous, and simple enough to be biologically plausible. We investigate the average behavior of this algorithm as a function of the size of the training set. We find that, as the size of the training set increases, the hypothesis network built by the algorithm "converges" to the target network, both in terms of the number of perceptrons and the connectivity. Moreover, the generalization rate converges exponentially to perfect generalization as a function of the number of training examples. The analytic expressions are in excellent agreement with the numerical simulations. To our knowledge, this is the first average case analysis of an algorithm that finds both the weight values and the network connectivity.
Mostefa Golea
Int. J. Neural Syst.1
1994 Learning Nonoverlapping Perceptron Networks from Examples and Membership Queries
Thomas R. Hancock, Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand
Mach. Learn.2
1993 Average Case Analysis of the Clipped Hebb Rule for Nonoverlapping Perception Networks
abstract
Article Average case analysis of the clipped Hebb rule for nonoverlapping perception networks Share on Authors: Mostefa Golea View Profile , Mario Marchand View Profile Authors Info & Claims COLT '93: Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theoryAugust 1993 Pages 151–157https://doi.org/10.1145/168304.168323Published:01 August 1993 3citation149DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations3Total Downloads149Last 12 Months1Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand
COLT1
1993 Polynomial Time Algorithms for Learning Neural Nets of NonoverlappingPerceptrons
abstract
We investigate the problem of learning two‐layer neural nets of nonoverlapping perceptrons where each input unit is connected to one and only one hidden unit. We first show that this restricted problem with no overlap at all between the receptive fields of the hidden units is as hard as the general problem (with total overlap) if the learner uses examples only. However, if membership queries are allowed, the restricted problem is indeed easier to solve. We give a learning algorithm that uses examples and membership queries to PAC learn the intersection of K‐nonoverlapping perceptrons, regardless of whether the instance space in Boolean, discrete, or continuous. An extension of this algorithm is proven to PAC learn two‐layer nets with K‐nonoverlapping perceptrons. The simulations performed indicate that both algorithms are fast and efficient.
Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand
Comput. Intell.1
1993 On Learning Perceptrons with Binary Weights
abstract
We present an algorithm that PAC learns any perceptron with binary weights and arbitrary threshold under the family of product distributions. The sample complexity of this algorithm is of O[(n/ε)4 ln(n/δ)] and its running time increases only linearly with the number of training examples. The algorithm does not try to find an hypothesis that agrees with all of the training examples; rather, it constructs a binary perceptron based on various probabilistic estimates obtained from the training examples. We show that, under the restricted case of the uniform distribution and zero threshold, the algorithm reduces to the well known clipped Hebb rule. We calculate exactly the average generalization rate (i.e., the learning curve) of the algorithm, under the uniform distribution, in the limit of an infinite number of dimensions. We find that the error rate decreases exponentially as a function of the number of training examples. Hence, the average case analysis gives a sample complexity of O[n ln(1/ε)], a large improvement over the PAC learning analysis. The analytical expression of the learning curve is in excellent agreement with the extensive numerical simulations. In addition, the algorithm is very robust with respect to classification noise.
Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand
Neural Comput.1
1992 On Learning µ-Perceptron Networks with Binary Weights
Mostefa Golea, Mario Marchand, Thomas R. Hancock
NIPS1