Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian H. Mayoh

dblp:59/3484 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › grammar formalisms
attribute grammars
0.011981
Attribute Grammars and Mathematical Semantics · SIAM J. Comput. 1981
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
denotational semantics
0.011981
Attribute Grammars and Mathematical Semantics · SIAM J. Comput. 1981
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
formal semantics
0.011981
Attribute Grammars and Mathematical Semantics · SIAM J. Comput. 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mathematical semantics · 0.0attribute grammar formalism · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Models of Programs and Processes
Brian H. Mayoh
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1981 Attribute Grammars and Mathematical Semantics
abstract
Attribute grammars and mathematical semantics are rival language definition methods. We show that any attribute grammar G has a reformulation MS (G) within mathematical semantics. Most attribute grammars have properties that discipline the sets of equations the grammar gives to derivation trees. We list six such properties, and show that for a grammar G with one of these properties both MS (G) and the compiler for G can be simplified. Because these compiler-friendly properties are of independent interest, the paper is written in such a way that the first and last sections do not depend on the other sections.
Brian H. Mayoh
SIAM J. Comput.1
1978 Data Types as Functions
Brian H. Mayoh
MFCS1
1972 Recursion and Stacks
Brian H. Mayoh
Inf. Process. Lett.1