Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Hickl

dblp:59/5016 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 43% Information extraction and text analysis · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
interactive question answering
0.122006
FERRET: Interactive Question-Answering for Real-World Environments · ACL 2006
Experiments with Interactive Question-Answering · ACL 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
bayesian hierarchical clustering
0.112009
Nonparametric Bayesian Models for Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model
0.112009
Nonparametric Bayesian Models for Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution · NIPS 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution
0.112009
Nonparametric Bayesian Models for Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution · NIPS 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › coreference resolution
event coreference resolution
0.112009
Nonparametric Bayesian Models for Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution · NIPS 2009
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › community question answering
answer ranking
0.112006
Methods for Using Textual Entailment in Open-Domain Question Answering · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge base question answering
complex question answering
0.112006
Answering complex questions with random walk models · SIGIR 2006
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic in computer science
0.112006
Negation, Contrast and Contradiction in Text Processing · AAAI 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
natural language semantics
0.112006
Negation, Contrast and Contradiction in Text Processing · AAAI 2006
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering
0.112006
Methods for Using Textual Entailment in Open-Domain Question Answering · ACL 2006
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question decomposition
0.112006
Answering complex questions with random walk models · SIGIR 2006
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
textual entailment
0.112006
Methods for Using Textual Entailment in Open-Domain Question Answering · ACL 2006
Information retrieval › text summarization
multi-document summarization
0.112006
Answering complex questions with random walk models · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112006
Answering complex questions with random walk models · SIGIR 2006
Usability and user experience research
user study
0.012005
Experiments with Interactive Question-Answering · ACL 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

textual entailment · 0.1random walk · 0.1markov chain · 0.1bipartite graph · 0.1answer ranking · 0.1predictive questioning · 0.1nonparametric bayesian modeling · 0.1dirichlet process · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Relevance Modeling for Microblog Summarization
Sanda M. Harabagiu, Andrew Hickl
ICWSM2
2009 Nonparametric Bayesian Models for Unsupervised Event Coreference Resolution
abstract
We present a sequence of unsupervised, nonparametric Bayesian models for clustering complex linguistic objects. In this approach, we consider a potentially infinite number of features and categorical outcomes. We evaluate these models for the task of within- and cross-document event coreference on two corpora. All the models we investigated show significant improvements when compared against an existing baseline for this task.
Cosmin Adrian Bejan, Matthew Titsworth, Andrew Hickl, Sanda M. Harabagiu
NIPS3
2008 Answering questions with authority
abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to textual question answering (QA) which identifies answers to natural language questions by leveraging large collections of question-answer pairs extracted from web sources or generated automatically from text.
Andrew Hickl
CIKM1
2008 Using Discourse Commitments to Recognize Textual Entailment
Andrew Hickl
COLING1
2008 Unsupervised Resource Creation for Textual Inference Applications
Jeremy Bensley, Andrew Hickl
LREC2
2008 Scaling Answer Type Detection to Large Hierarchies
Kirk Roberts, Andrew Hickl
LREC2
2007 Satisfying information needs with multi-document summaries
Sanda M. Harabagiu, Andrew Hickl, V. Finley Lacatusu
Inf. Process. Manag.2
2006 Negation, Contrast and Contradiction in Text Processing
Sanda M. Harabagiu, Andrew Hickl, V. Finley Lacatusu
AAAI2
2006 Methods for Using Textual Entailment in Open-Domain Question Answering
abstract
Work on the semantics of questions has argued that the relation between a question and its answer(s) can be cast in terms of logical entailment. In this paper, we demonstrate how computational systems designed to recognize textual entailment can be used to enhance the accuracy of current open-domain automatic question answering (Q/A) systems. In our experiments, we show that when textual entailment information is used to either filter or rank answers returned by a Q/A system, accuracy can be increased by as much as 20% overall.
Sanda M. Harabagiu, Andrew Hickl
ACL2
2006 FERRET: Interactive Question-Answering for Real-World Environments
abstract
This paper describes FERRET, an interactive question-answering (Q/A) system designed to address the challenges of integrating automatic Q/A applications into real-world environments. FERRET utilizes a novel approach to Q/A - known as predictive questioning - which attempts to identify the questions (and answers) that users need by analyzing how a user interacts with a system while gathering information related to a particular scenario.
Andrew Hickl, Patrick Wang 0001, John Lehmann, Sanda M. Harabagiu
ACL1
2006 Impact of Question Decomposition on the Quality of Answer Summaries
V. Finley Lacatusu, Andrew Hickl, Sanda M. Harabagiu
LREC2
2006 What in the world is a Shahab?: Wide Coverage Named Entity Recognition for Arabic
Luke Nezda, Andrew Hickl, John Lehmann, Sarmad Fayyaz
LREC2
2006 Answering complex questions with random walk models
abstract
We present a novel framework for answering complex questions that relies on question decomposition. Complex questions are decomposed by a procedure that operates on a Markov chain, by following a random walk on a bipartite graph of relations established between concepts related to the topic of a complex question and subquestions derived from topic-relevant passages that manifest these relations. Decomposed questions discovered during this random walk are then submitted to a state-of-the-art Question Answering (Q/A) system in order to retrieve a set of passages that can later be merged into a comprehensive answer by a Multi-Document Summarization (MDS) system. In our evaluations, we show that access to the decompositions generated using this method can significantly enhance the relevance and comprehensiveness of summary-length answers to complex questions.
Sanda M. Harabagiu, V. Finley Lacatusu, Andrew Hickl
SIGIR3
2005 Experiments with Interactive Question-Answering
abstract
This paper describes a novel framework for interactive question-answering (Q/A) based on predictive questioning. Generated off-line from topic representations of complex scenarios, predictive questions represent requests for information that capture the most salient (and diverse) aspects of a topic. We present experimental results from large user studies (featuring a fully-implemented interactive Q/A system named FERRET) that demonstrates that surprising performance is achieved by integrating predictive questions into the context of a Q/A dialogue.
Sanda M. Harabagiu, Andrew Hickl, John Lehmann, Dan I. Moldovan
ACL2