Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aditya Telang

dblp:59/5239 · also Aditya D. Telang · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Computer networks · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Spatial and temporal data management · 44% Information retrieval · 38% Data mining · 15%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network optimization and economics · 62% Cellular and mobile networks · 38%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
similarity search
0.322015
Spatio-Temporal Signatures of User-Centric Data: How Similar Are We? · AAAI 2015
Indexing and matching trajectories under inconsistent sampling rates · ICDE 2015
Spatial and temporal data management
spatio-temporal similarity
0.212015
Spatio-Temporal Signatures of User-Centric Data: How Similar Are We? · AAAI 2015
Spatial and temporal data management › spatio-temporal indexing
trajectory indexing
0.212015
Indexing and matching trajectories under inconsistent sampling rates · ICDE 2015
Spatial and temporal data management › trajectory analysis
trajectory matching
0.212015
Indexing and matching trajectories under inconsistent sampling rates · ICDE 2015
Network optimization and economics › network design › network planning
cellular network planning
0.212015
Trajectory aware macro-cell planning for mobile users · INFOCOM 2015
Cellular and mobile networks
mobility management
0.212015
Trajectory aware macro-cell planning for mobile users · INFOCOM 2015
Information retrieval › ranking
query-dependent ranking
0.112012
One Size Does Not Fit All: Toward User- and Query-Dependent Ranking for Web Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2012
Information retrieval
ranking
0.112012
One Size Does Not Fit All: Toward User- and Query-Dependent Ranking for Web Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2012
Data mining › text mining › text classification
email classification
0.112010
A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email Classification · ICDM 2010
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.112010
A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email Classification · ICDM 2010
Network optimization and economics › network design › network planning
base station deployment
0.112015
Trajectory aware macro-cell planning for mobile users · INFOCOM 2015
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation
network utility maximization
0.112015
Trajectory aware macro-cell planning for mobile users · INFOCOM 2015
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.112015
Spatio-Temporal Signatures of User-Centric Data: How Similar Are We? · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
supervised learning
0.012010
A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email Classification · ICDM 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spatio-temporal signatures · 0.4hybrid pruning · 0.4approximation scheme · 0.4ranking · 0.2lipschitz embedding · 0.2heuristic algorithm · 0.2graph mining · 0.2dynamic interpolation · 0.2bounding box · 0.2NP-hardness analysis · 0.2user profiling · 0.1collaborative filtering · 0.1TF-IDF · 0.1SVM · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Spatio-Temporal Signatures of User-Centric Data: How Similar Are We?
abstract
Much work has been done on understanding and predicting human mobility in time. In this work, we are interested in obtaining a set of users who are spatio-temporally most similar to a query user. We propose an efficient way of user data representation called Spatio-Temporal Signatures to keep track of complete record of user movement. We define a measure called Spatio-Temporal similarity for comparing a given pair of users. Although computing exact pairwise Spatio-Temporal similarities between query user with all users is inefficient, we show that with our hybrid pruning scheme the most similar users can be obtained in logarithmic time with in a (1+\epsilon) factor approximation of the optimal. We are developing a framework to test our models against a real dataset of urban users.
Samta Shukla, Aditya Telang, Salil Joshi 0001, L. Venkata Subramaniam
AAAI2
2015 Indexing and matching trajectories under inconsistent sampling rates
abstract
Quantifying the similarity between two trajectories is a fundamental operation in analysis of spatio-temporal databases. While a number of distance functions exist, the recent shift in the dynamics of the trajectory generation procedure violates one of their core assumptions; a consistent and uniform sampling rate. In this paper, we formulate a robust distance function called Edit Distance with Projections (EDwP) to match trajectories under inconsistent and variable sampling rates through dynamic interpolation. This is achieved by deploying the idea of projections that goes beyond matching only the sampled points while aligning trajectories. To enable efficient trajectory retrievals using EDwP, we design an index structure called TrajTree. TrajTree derives its pruning power by employing the unique combination of bounding boxes with Lipschitz embedding. Extensive experiments on real trajectory databases demonstrate EDwP to be up to 5 times more accurate than the state-of-the-art distance functions. Additionally, TrajTree increases the efficiency of trajectory retrievals by up to an order of magnitude over existing techniques.
Sayan Ranu, Deepak P 0001, Aditya Telang, Prasad Deshpande, Sriram Raghavan
ICDE3
2015 Trajectory aware macro-cell planning for mobile users
abstract
We handle the problem of efficient user-mobility driven macro-cell planning in cellular networks. As cellular networks embrace heterogeneous technologies (including long range 3G/4G and short range WiFi, Femto-cells, etc.), most traffic generated by static users gets absorbed by the short-range technologies, thereby increasingly leaving mobile user traffic to macro-cells. To this end, we consider a novel approach that factors in the trajectories of mobile users as well as the impact of city geographies and their associated road networks for macro-cell planning. Given a budget k of base-stations that can be upgraded, our approach selects a deployment that improves the most number of user trajectories. The generic formulation incorporates the notion of quality of service of a user trajectory as a parameter to allow different application-specific requirements, and operator choices. We show that the proposed trajectory utility maximization problem is NP-hard, and design multiple heuristics. We evaluate our algorithms with real and synthetic datasets emulating different city geographies to demonstrate their efficacy. For instance, with an upgrade budget k of 20%, our algorithms perform 3-8 times better in improving the user quality of service on trajectories when compared to greedy location-based base-station upgrades.
Shubhadip Mitra, Sayan Ranu, Vinay Kolar, Aditya Telang, Arnab Bhattacharya 0001, Ravi Kokku, Sriram Raghavan
INFOCOM4
2014 Detecting localized homogeneous anomalies over spatio-temporal data
Aditya Telang, Deepak P 0001, Salil Joshi 0001, Prasad Deshpande, Ranjana Rajendran
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.1
2013 Personalized ranking in web databases: establishing and utilizing an appropriate workload
Aditya Telang, Sharma Chakravarthy, Chengkai Li 0001
Distributed Parallel Databases1
2012 One Size Does Not Fit All: Toward User- and Query-Dependent Ranking for Web Databases
abstract
With the emergence of the deep web, searching web databases in domains such as vehicles, real estate, etc., has become a routine task. One of the problems in this context is ranking the results of a user query. Earlier approaches for addressing this problem have used frequencies of database values, query logs, and user profiles. A common thread in most of these approaches is that ranking is done in a user- and/or query-independent manner. This paper proposes a novel query- and user-dependent approach for ranking query results in web databases. We present a ranking model, based on two complementary notions of user and query similarity, to derive a ranking function for a given user query. This function is acquired from a sparse workload comprising of several such ranking functions derived for various user-query pairs. The model is based on the intuition that similar users display comparable ranking preferences over the results of similar queries. We define these similarities formally in alternative ways and discuss their effectiveness analytically and experimentally over two distinct web databases.
Aditya Telang, Chengkai Li 0001, Sharma Chakravarthy
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2010 A Graph-Based Approach for Multi-folder Email Classification
abstract
This paper presents a novel framework for multi-folder email classification using graph mining as the underlying technique. Although several techniques exist (e.g., SVM, TF-IDF, n-gram) for addressing this problem in a delimited context, they heavily rely on extracting high-frequency keywords, thus ignoring the inherent structural aspects of an email (or document in general) which can play a critical role in classification. Some of the models (e.g., n-gram) consider only the words without taking into consideration where in the structure these words appear together. This paper presents a supervised learning model that leverages graph mining techniques for multi-folder email classification. A ranking formula is presented for ordering the representative - common and recurring - substructures generated from pre-classified emails. These ranked representative substructures are then used for categorizing incoming emails. This approach is based on a global ranking model that incorporates several relevant parameters for email classification and overcomes numerous problems faced by extant approaches used for multi-folder classification. A number of parameters which influence the generation of representative substructures are analyzed, reexamined, and adapted to multiple folders. The effect of graph representations has been analyzed. The effectiveness of the proposed approach has been validated experimentally.
Sharma Chakravarthy, Aravind Venkatachalam, Aditya Telang
ICDM3
2009 Query-By-Keywords (QBK): Query Formulation Using Semantics and Feedback
Aditya Telang, Sharma Chakravarthy, Chengkai Li 0001
ER1