Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Gordon
dblp:59/6084
· DBLP profile ↗
14ranked-venue papers
8as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8515-0523ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 29% Motion planning and robot control · 15% Reinforcement learning · 14% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › multi-robot motion planning
communication-aware motion planning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Communication-aware Robot Motion Planning via Online Estimation of Radio Maps · INFOCOM 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
self-supervised visual representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | What Can You Learn From Your Muscles? Learning Visual Representation from Human Interactions · ICLR 2021 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
embodied instruction following |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-and-language navigation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday Tasks · CVPR 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual navigation
embodied visual navigation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SplitNet: Sim2Sim and Task2Task Transfer for Embodied Visual Navigation · ICCV 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › multimodal question answering
embodied question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | IQA: Visual Question Answering in Interactive Environments · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | IQA: Visual Question Answering in Interactive Environments · CVPR 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
interactive question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | IQA: Visual Question Answering in Interactive Environments · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | IQA: Visual Question Answering in Interactive Environments · CVPR 2018 |
Wireless sensing and localization
radio map |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Communication-aware Robot Motion Planning via Online Estimation of Radio Maps · INFOCOM 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › plan generation
action sequence planning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Visual Semantic Planning Using Deep Successor Representations · ICCV 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Visual Semantic Planning Using Deep Successor Representations · ICCV 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
successor representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Visual Semantic Planning Using Deep Successor Representations · ICCV 2017 |
Wearable and physiological sensing
motion sensing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | What Can You Learn From Your Muscles? Learning Visual Representation from Human Interactions · ICLR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online estimation · 2.0imitation learning · 0.4selective learning · 0.4decoupled perception and policy · 0.4auxiliary tasks · 0.4hierarchical memory network · 0.3factorized controllers · 0.3deep predictive models · 0.3bootstrapping · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Communication-aware Robot Motion Planning via Online Estimation of Radio Maps
Daniel Gordon, Mohammad Bariq Khan, Tommaso Zugno, Mate Boban, Xueli An, Falko Dressler |
INFOCOM | 1 |
| 2021 | What Can You Learn From Your Muscles? Learning Visual Representation from Human Interactions
Kiana Ehsani, Daniel Gordon, Thomas Hai Dang Nguyen, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Ali Farhadi |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | ALFRED: A Benchmark for Interpreting Grounded Instructions for Everyday TasksabstractWe present ALFRED (Action Learning From Realistic Environments and Directives), a benchmark for learning a mapping from natural language instructions and egocentric vision to sequences of actions for household tasks. ALFRED includes long, compositional tasks with non-reversible state changes to shrink the gap between research benchmarks and real-world applications. ALFRED consists of expert demonstrations in interactive visual environments for 25k natural language directives. These directives contain both high-level goals like “Rinse off a mug and place it in the coffee maker.” and low-level language instructions like “Walk to the coffee maker on the right.” ALFRED tasks are more complex in terms of sequence length, action space, and language than existing vision- and-language task datasets. We show that a baseline model based on recent embodied vision-and-language tasks performs poorly on ALFRED, suggesting that there is significant room for developing innovative grounded visual language understanding models with this benchmark. Mohit Shridhar, Jesse Thomason, Daniel Gordon, Yonatan Bisk, Winson Han, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Luke Zettlemoyer, Dieter Fox |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2019 | SplitNet: Sim2Sim and Task2Task Transfer for Embodied Visual NavigationabstractWe propose SplitNet, a method for decoupling visual perception and policy learning. By incorporating auxiliary tasks and selective learning of portions of the model, we explicitly decompose the learning objectives for visual navigation into perceiving the world and acting on that perception. We show improvements over baseline models on transferring between simulators, an encouraging step towards Sim2Real. Additionally, SplitNet generalizes better to unseen environments from the same simulator and transfers faster and more effectively to novel embodied navigation tasks. Further, given only a small sample from a target domain, SplitNet can match the performance of traditional end-to-end pipelines which receive the entire dataset1. Daniel Gordon, Abhishek Kadian, Devi Parikh, Judy Hoffman, Dhruv Batra |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2018 | IQA: Visual Question Answering in Interactive EnvironmentsabstractWe introduce Interactive Question Answering (IQA), the task of answering questions that require an autonomous agent to interact with a dynamic visual environment. IQA presents the agent with a scene and a question, like: "Are there any apples in the fridge?" The agent must navigate around the scene, acquire visual understanding of scene elements, interact with objects (e.g. open refrigerators) and plan for a series of actions conditioned on the question. Popular reinforcement learning approaches with a single controller perform poorly on IQA owing to the large and diverse state space. We propose the Hierarchical Interactive Memory Network (HIMN), consisting of a factorized set of controllers, allowing the system to operate at multiple levels of temporal abstraction. To evaluate HIMN, we introduce IQUAD V1, a new dataset built upon AI2-THOR [35], a simulated photo-realistic environment of configurable indoor scenes with interactive objects. IQUAD V1 has 75,000 questions, each paired with a unique scene configuration. Our experiments show that our proposed model outperforms popular single controller based methods on IQUAD V1. For sample questions and results, please view our video: https://youtu.be/pXd3C-1jr98. Daniel Gordon, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Mohammad Rastegari, Joseph Redmon, Dieter Fox, Ali Farhadi |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2018 | Early detection of spamming accounts in large-Scale service provider networks
Yehonatan Cohen, Daniel Gordon, Danny Hendler |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |
| 2017 | Visual Semantic Planning Using Deep Successor RepresentationsabstractA crucial capability of real-world intelligent agents is their ability to plan a sequence of actions to achieve their goals in the visual world. In this work, we address the problem of visual semantic planning: the task of predicting a sequence of actions from visual observations that transform a dynamic environment from an initial state to a goal state. Doing so entails knowledge about objects and their affordances, as well as actions and their preconditions and effects. We propose learning these through interacting with a visual and dynamic environment. Our proposed solution involves bootstrapping reinforcement learning with imitation learning. To ensure cross task generalization, we develop a deep predictive model based on successor representations. Our experimental results show near optimal results across a wide range of tasks in the challenging THOR environment. Yuke Zhu, Daniel Gordon, Eric Kolve, Dieter Fox, Li Fei-Fei 0001, Abhinav Gupta 0001, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Ali Farhadi |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2015 | Local-shapelets for fast classification of spectrographic measurements
Daniel Gordon, Danny Hendler, Aryeh Kontorovich, Lior Rokach |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |
| 2015 | Fast and space-efficient shapelets-based time-series classificationabstractTime series classification is a research area which has drawn much attention over the past decade. A novel approach for classification of time series uses shapelets. A shapelet is a subsequence extracted from one of the time series in the dataset which best separates between time series coming from different classes of the data set. A disadvantage of current shapelet-based classification approaches is their high time and memory consumption, which results from the examination of all possible subsequences. In this study, our initial goal was to find an evaluation order of the shapelets space which enables fast generation of an accurate classification model with a small memory footprint. The comparative analysis we conducted clearly indicates that a random evaluation order yields the best results. We present an algorithm for randomized model generation for shapelet-based classification that can generate a model with surprisingly high accuracy after evaluating only an exceedingly small fraction (∼ 10-3) of the shapelets space and has modest memory requirements. We propose several methods for estimating the number of shapelets to examine, and present extensive evaluation on 51 data sets establishing the effectiveness of our approach. Daniel Gordon, Danny Hendler, Lior Rokach |
Intell. Data Anal. | 1 |
| 2013 | Early Detection of Outgoing Spammers in Large-Scale Service Provider Networks
Yehonatan Cohen, Daniel Gordon, Danny Hendler |
DIMVA | 2 |
| 2006 | Using Simple Pushlogic
David J. Greaves, Daniel Gordon |
WEBIST (1) | 2 |
| 2000 | What Is Happenning In Canadian Health Informatics Research and Education?
Daniel Gordon, Kevin J. Leonard, Michael Carter, David L. Buckeridge |
AMIA | 1 |
| 1999 | Merging multiple institutions: information architecture problems and solutions
Daniel Gordon |
AMIA | 1 |
| 1998 | What is an electronic patient record?
Daniel Gordon, Glen Geiger, N. Lowe, J. Jickling |
AMIA | 1 |