Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eli R. Hooten

dblp:59/7940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0003-2467-9890ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Interaction techniques and input · 65% Human-robot interaction · 35%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
communication modalities
0.212013
Communicative modalities for mobile device interaction · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013
Interaction techniques and input
mobile interaction
0.212013
Communicative modalities for mobile device interaction · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2013
Interaction techniques and input › touch interaction
multi-touch interaction
0.112010
Multi-touch interaction for tasking robots · HRI 2010
Interaction techniques and input
touch and gesture input
0.012010
Multi-touch interaction for tasking robots · HRI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user evaluation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Cancerous tweets: Socially sharing sensitive health information
abstract
Social networks provide opportunities to overshare information in a secondhand nature as information passes from primary to secondary to tertiary sources. This information can be supplemented with geographical information to obtain the approximate location of the primary information source without the primary source's consent, presenting a potential breach of privacy. Messages regarding severe illness were obtained from the popular social media site Twitter to understand how sensitive information may propagate unregulated through secondhand information sharing. Results indicate that 59% of tweets concerning severe illness are Retweets distributed without explicit consent from the primary source. A majority of these Retweets were propagated by family and friends of the primary source.
Michael D. Anderson, Julie A. Adams, Eli R. Hooten
SMC3
2013 Communicative modalities for mobile device interaction
Eli R. Hooten, Sean Timothy Hayes, Julie A. Adams
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.1
2011 Comparing input error for mouse and touch input
abstract
Precise selection is one of the key difficulties of touch-based interaction. In some cases (such as interacting with a map-based interface), precise selection is crucial for the correct specification of information. This work investigates the difference in user input error and speed for line drawing tasks using touch and mouse-based interaction. A parameterized method of solving the nearest-point-on-a-curve problem was developed in order to obtain a quantifiable error difference between mouse and touch-based interaction for line drawing tasks. A user study was conducted and determined that mouse-based interaction occurs at a slower rate of speed and results in less error than touch-based interaction for line drawing tasks.
Eli R. Hooten, Julie A. Adams
SMC1
2010 Multi-touch interaction for tasking robots
abstract
The objective is to develop a mobile human-robot interface that is optimized for multi-touch input. Our existing interface was designed for mouse and keyboard input and was later adopted for voice and touch interaction. A new multi-touch interface permits multi-touch gestures, for example zooming and panning a map, and robot task specific touch interactions. An initial user evaluation found that the multi-touch interface is preferred and yields superior performance.
Sean Timothy Hayes, Eli R. Hooten, Julie A. Adams
HRI2