Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amanda Sgroi

dblp:60/11341 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security
iris recognition
0.422015
Strong, Neutral, or Weak: Exploring the Impostor Score Distribution · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2015
A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012
Biometric security
face recognition
0.212015
Strong, Neutral, or Weak: Exploring the Impostor Score Distribution · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2015
Biometric security
fingerprint recognition
0.212015
Strong, Neutral, or Weak: Exploring the Impostor Score Distribution · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2015
Biometric security › iris recognition
cross-sensor matching
0.112012
A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012
Biometric security › iris recognition
iris matching
0.012012
A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

outlier detection · 0.2multialgorithm comparison · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Strong, Neutral, or Weak: Exploring the Impostor Score Distribution
abstract
The strong, neutral, or weak (SNoW) face impostor pairs problem is intended to explore the causes and impact of impostor face pairs that are inherently strong (easily recognized as nonmatches) or weak (possible false matches). The SNoW technique develops three partitions within the impostor score distribution of a given data set. Results provide evidence that varying degrees of impostor scores impact the overall performance of a face recognition system. This paper extends our earlier work to incorporate improvements regarding outlier detection for partitioning, explores the SNoW concept for the additional modalities of fingerprint and iris, and presents methods for how to begin to reveal the causes of weak impostor pairs. We also show a clear operational difference between strong and weak comparisons as well as identify partition stability across multiple algorithms.
Amanda Sgroi, Patrick J. Flynn, Kevin W. Bowyer, P. Jonathon Phillips
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2012 A Multialgorithm Analysis of Three Iris Biometric Sensors
abstract
The issue of interoperability between iris sensors is an important topic in large-scale and long-term applications of iris biometric systems. This work compares three commercially available iris sensors and three iris matching systems and investigates the impact of cross-sensor matching on system performance in comparison to single-sensor performance. Several factors which may impact single-sensor and cross-sensor performance are analyzed, including changes in the acquisition environment and differences in dilation ratio between iris images. The sensors are evaluated using three different iris matching algorithms, and conclusions are drawn regarding the interaction between the sensors and the matching algorithm in both the cross-sensor and single-sensor scenarios. Finally, the relative performances of the three sensors are compared.
Ryan Connaughton, Amanda Sgroi, Kevin W. Bowyer, Patrick J. Flynn
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2