Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter K. D. Froome

dblp:60/1411 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 44% Software testing · 44% Programming languages and type systems · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › formal specification
VDM
0.011986
The Application of Formal Methods to the Assessment of High Integrity Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1986
Programming languages and type systems › logic programming
prolog
0.011986
The Application of Formal Methods to the Assessment of High Integrity Software · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vienna development method · 0.0logic programming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 The Development of a Commercial "Shrink-Wrapped Application" to Safety Integrity Level 2: The DUST-EXPERTTM Story
Tim Clement, Ian Cottam, Peter K. D. Froome, Claire Jones
SAFECOMP3
1986 The Application of Formal Methods to the Assessment of High Integrity Software
abstract
A case study is presented in which the Vienna development method (VDM), a formal specification and development methodology, was used during the analysis phase of the assessment of a prototype nuclear reactor protection system. The VDM specification was also translated into the logic language Prolog to animate the specification and to provide a diverse implementation for use in back-to-back testing. It is claimed that this technique provides a visible and effective method of analysis which is superior to the informal alternatives.
Robin E. Bloomfield, Peter K. D. Froome
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2