Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
John W. Stoughton
dblp:60/3708
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 34% Embedded and real-time systems · 26% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 13% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance prediction |
0.0 | 2 | 1993 | Prediction of Performance and Processor Requirements in Real-Time Data Flow Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1993 Strategies for Predictability in Real-Time Data-Flow Architectures · RTSS 1990 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
multiprocessor scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Prediction of Performance and Processor Requirements in Real-Time Data Flow Architectures · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 1993 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › algorithm-hardware co-design
algorithm-to-architecture mapping |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Strategies for Predictability in Real-Time Data-Flow Architectures · RTSS 1990 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
dataflow architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Strategies for Predictability in Real-Time Data-Flow Architectures · RTSS 1990 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel computing |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Strategies for Predictability in Real-Time Data-Flow Architectures · RTSS 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ATAMM · 0.0data flow graph analysis · 0.0marked graph model · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Prediction of Performance and Processor Requirements in Real-Time Data Flow ArchitecturesabstractPresents a new data flow graph model for describing the real-time execution of iterative control and signal processing algorithms on multiprocessor data flow architectures. Identified by the acronym ATAMM, for Algorithm to Architecture Mapping Model, the model is important because it specifies criteria for a multiprocessor operating system to achieve predictable and reliable performance. Algorithm performance is characterized by execution time and iteration period. For a given data flow graph representation, the model facilitates calculation of greatest lower bounds for these performance measures. When sufficient processors are available, the system executes algorithms with minimum execution time and minimum iteration period, and the number of processors required is calculated. When only limited processors are available or when processors fail, performance is made to degrade gracefully and predictably. The user off-line is able to specify tradeoffs between increasing execution time or increasing iteration period. The approach to achieving predictable performance is to control the injection rate of input data and to modify the data flow graph precedence relations so that a processor is always available to execute an enabled graph node. An implementation of the ATAMM model in a four-processor architecture based on Westinghouse's VHSIC 1750A Instruction Set Processor is described.> Sukhamoy Som, Roland R. Mielke, John W. Stoughton |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 3 |
| 1990 | Strategies for Predictability in Real-Time Data-Flow ArchitecturesabstractConsideration is given to the development of strategies for predictable performance in homogeneous multicomputer data-flow architectures operating in real-time. Algorithms are restricted to the class of large-grained, decision-free algorithms. The mapping of such algorithms onto the specified class of data-flow architectures is realized by a new marked graph model called ATAMM (algorithm to architecture mapping model). Algorithm performance and resource needs are determined for predictable periodic execution of algorithms, which is achieved by algorithm modification and input data injection control. Performance is gracefully degraded to adapt to decreasing numbers of resources. The realization of the ATAMM model on a VHSIC four processor testbed is described. A software design tool for prediction of performance and resource requirements is described and is used to evaluate the performance of a space surveillance algorithm.> Sukhamoy Som, Roland R. Mielke, John W. Stoughton |
RTSS | 3 |
| 1988 | Modeling and Performance Bounds for Concurrent ProcessingabstractA novel graph-theoretic model for describing the relation between a decomposed algorithm and its execution in a multiprocessor environment is developed. Called ATAMM, the model consists of a set of Petri-net marked graphs that incorporates the general specifications of a data-flow architecture. The model is useful for representing decision-free algorithms having large-grained, computationally complex primitive operations. Performance measures of computing speed and throughput capacity are defined. The ATAMM model is used to develop analytically lower bounds for these parameters.> Roland R. Mielke, John W. Stoughton, Sukhamoy Som |
ICDCS | 2 |
| 1980 | Modification of "A Least Mean Squares CUBIC Algorithm for On-Line Differential of Sampled Analog Signals"abstractModification of the original algorithm by Allum1yields a computationally efficient algorithm. The computational improvement, nominally 20 percent, is significant when real-time digital signal processing applications are involved. John W. Stoughton |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |