Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yiftach Ravid

dblp:60/5756 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 8Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 70% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 10% Computational complexity · 10%
Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 77% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 23%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.041998
Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion-Planning Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1994
Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal · FOCS 1991
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.031998
Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion-Planning Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1994
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion Planning Algorithms · STOC 1991
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms › online graph algorithms
online graph exploration
0.021998
Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal · FOCS 1991
Authentication and access control › access control
role-based access control
0.012000
Access Control Meets Public Key Infrastructure, Or: Assigning Roles to Strangers · S&P 2000
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
k-server problem
0.031994
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion-Planning Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1994
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion Planning Algorithms · STOC 1991
Competitive k-Server Algorithms (Extended Abstract) · FOCS 1990
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph traversal
0.011998
Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal · SIAM J. Comput. 1998
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.021994
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion-Planning Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1994
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion Planning Algorithms · STOC 1991
Computational geometry
motion planning
0.021994
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion-Planning Algorithms · SIAM J. Comput. 1994
Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion Planning Algorithms · STOC 1991
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
public key infrastructure
0.012000
Access Control Meets Public Key Infrastructure, Or: Assigning Roles to Strangers · S&P 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trust policy language · 0.0certificate chain collection · 0.0competitive analysis · 0.0randomized algorithm · 0.0competitive ratio analysis · 0.0lower bound · 0.0randomized lower bounds · 0.0oblivious adversary · 0.0metric space analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Access Control Meets Public Key Infrastructure, Or: Assigning Roles to Strangers
abstract
The Internet enables connectivity between many strangers: entities that don't know each other. We present the Trust Policy Language (TPL), used to define the mapping of strangers to predefined business roles, based on certificates issued by third parties. TPL is expressive enough to allow complex policies, e.g. non-monotone (negative) certificates, while being simple enough to allow automated policy checking and processing. Issuers of certificates are either known in advance, or provide sufficient certificates to be considered a trusted authority according to the policy. This allows bottom-up, "grass roots" buildup of trust, as in the real world. We extend, rather than replace, existing role based access control mechanisms. This provides a simple, modular architecture and easy migration from existing systems. Our system automatically collects missing certificates from peer servers. In particular this allows use of standard browsers, which pass only one certificate to the server. We describe our implementation, which can be used as an extension of a Web server or as a separate server with interface to applications.
Amir Herzberg, Yosi Mass, Joris Mihaeli, Dalit Naor, Yiftach Ravid
S&P5
1998 Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal
abstract
A layered graph is a connected graph whose vertices are partitioned into sets L 0 =s, L 1 , L 2 ,..., and whose edges, which have nonnegative integral weights, run between consecutive layers. Its width is $\max\{|L_i|\}$. In the on-line layered graph traversal problem, a searcher starts at s in a layered graph of unknown width and tries to reach a target vertex t; however, the vertices in layer i and the edges between layers i-1 and i are only revealed when the searcher reaches layer i-1. We give upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio of layered graph traversal algorithms. We give a deterministic on-line algorithm which is O(9 w )-competitive on width-w graphs and prove that for no w can a deterministic on-line algorithm have a competitive ratio better than 2 w-2 on width-w graphs. We prove that for all w, w/2 is a lower bound on the competitive ratio of any randomized on-line layered graph traversal algorithm. For traversing layered graphs consisting of w disjoint paths tied together at a common source, we give a randomized on-line algorithm with a competitive ratio of O(log w) and prove that this is optimal up to a constant factor.
Amos Fiat, Dean P. Foster, Howard J. Karloff, Yuval Rabani, Yiftach Ravid, Sundar Vishwanathan
SIAM J. Comput.5
1994 A Deterministic O(k³)-Competitive k-Server Algorithm for the Circle
Amos Fiat, Yuval Rabani, Yiftach Ravid, Baruch Schieber
Algorithmica3
1994 Competitive k-Server Algorithms
Amos Fiat, Yuval Rabani, Yiftach Ravid
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.3
1994 Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion-Planning Algorithms
abstract
In this paper, the authors prove lower bounds on the competitive ratio of randomized algorithms for two on-line problems: the k-server problem, suggested by Manasse, McGeoch, and Sleator [Competitive lgorithms for on-line problems, J. Algorithms, 11 (1990), pp. 208–230], and an on-line motion-planning problem due to Papadimitriou and Yannakakis [Shortest paths without a map, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 372, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989, pp. 610–620]. The authors prove, against an oblivious adversary, 1. an $\Omega \log k$ lower bound on the competitive ratio of any randomized on-line k-server algorithm in any sufficiently large metric space, 2. an $\Omega (\log \log k)$ lower bound on the competitive ratio of any randomized on-line k-server algorithm in any metric space with at least $k + 1$ points, and 3. an $\Omega (\log \log n)$ lower bound on the competitive ratio of any on-line motion-planning algorithm for a scene with n obstacles. Previously, no superconstant lower bound on the competitive ratio of randomized on-line algorithms was known for any of these problems.
Howard J. Karloff, Yuval Rabani, Yiftach Ravid
SIAM J. Comput.3
1991 Competitive Algorithms for Layered Graph Traversal
abstract
A layered graph is a connected, weighted graph whose vertices are partitioned into sets L/sub 0/=(s), L/sub 1/, L/sub 2/, . . ., and whose edges run between consecutive layers. Its width is max( mod L/sub i/ mod ). In the online layered graph traversal problem, a searcher starts at s in a layered graph of unknown width and tries to reach a target vertex t; however, the vertices in layer i and the edges between layers i-1 and i are only revealed when the searcher reaches layer i-1. The authors give upper and lower bounds on the competitive ratio of layered graph traversal algorithms. They give a deterministic online algorithm that is O(9w)-competitive on width-w graphs and prove that for no w can a deterministic online algorithm have a competitive ratio better than 2w/sup -2/ on width-w graphs. They prove that for all w, w/2 is a lower bound on the competitive ratio of any randomized online layered graph traversal algorithm. For traversing layered graphs consisting of w disjoint paths tied together at a common source, they give a randomized online algorithm with a competitive ratio of O(log w) and prove that this is optimal up to a constant factor.>
Amos Fiat, Dean P. Foster, Howard J. Karloff, Yuval Rabani, Yiftach Ravid, Sundar Vishwanathan
FOCS5
1991 Lower Bounds for Randomized k-Server and Motion Planning Algorithms
abstract
No abstract available.
Howard J. Karloff, Yuval Rabani, Yiftach Ravid
STOC3
1990 Competitive k-Server Algorithms (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Deterministic competitive k-server algorithms are given for all k and all metric spaces. This settles the k-server conjecture of M.S. Manasse et al. (1988) up to the competitive ratio. The best previous result for general metric spaces was a three-server randomized competitive algorithm and a nonconstructive proof that a deterministic three-server competitive algorithm exists. The competitive ratio the present authors can prove is exponential in the number of servers. Thus, the question of the minimal competitive ratio for arbitrary metric spaces is still open. The methods set forth here also give competitive algorithms for a natural generalization of the k-server problem, called the k-taxicab problem.>
Amos Fiat, Yuval Rabani, Yiftach Ravid
FOCS3
1990 Universal sequences for complete graphs
Noga Alon, Yossi Azar, Yiftach Ravid
Discret. Appl. Math.3