Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jan De Beer
dblp:60/773
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 5Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 62% Network security · 38% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding
information hiding |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text Salting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Rpref: a generalization of Bpref towards graded relevance judgments · SIGIR 2006 |
Network security
content filtering |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text Salting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010 |
Network security › content filtering
spam filtering |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text Salting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
relevance judgment |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Rpref: a generalization of Bpref towards graded relevance judgments · SIGIR 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rendering command analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | New filtering approaches for phishing emailabstractPhishing emails usually contain a message from a credible looking source requesting a user to click a link to a website where she/he is asked to enter a password or other confidential information. Most phishing emails aim at withdrawing money from financial institutions or getting access to private information. Phishing has increased enormously over the last years and is a serious threat to global security and economy. There are a number of possible countermeasures to phishing. These range from communication-oriented approaches like authentication protocols over blacklisting to content-based filtering approaches. We argue that the first two approaches are currently not broadly implemented or exhibit deficits. Therefore content-based phishing filters are necessary and widely used to increase communication security. A number of features are extracted capturing the content and structural properties of the email. Subsequently a statistical classifier is trained using these features on a training set of emails labeled as ham (legitimate), spam or phishing. This classifier may then be applied to an email stream to estimate the classes of new incoming emails. In this paper we describe a number of novel features that are particularly well-suited to identify phishing emails. These include statistical models for the low-dimensional descriptions of email topics, sequential analysis of email text and external links, the detection of embedded logos as well as indicators for hidden salting. Hidden salting is the intentional addition or distortion of content not perceivable by the reader. For empirical evaluation we have obtained a large realistic corpus of emails prelabeled as spam, phishing, and ham (legitimate). In experiments our methods outperform other published approaches for classifying phishing emails. We discuss the implications of these results for the practical application of this approach in the workflow of an email provider. Finally we describe a strategy how the filters may be updated and adapted to new types of phishing. André Bergholz, Jan De Beer, Sebastian Glahn, Marie-Francine Moens, Gerhard Paass, Siehyun Strobel |
J. Comput. Secur. | 2 |
| 2010 | Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text SaltingabstractHidden salting in digital media involves the intentional addition or distortion of content patterns with the purpose of content filtering. We propose a method to detect portions of a digital text source which are invisible to the end user, when they are rendered on a visual medium (like a computer monitor). The method consists of “tapping” into the rendering process and analyzing the rendering commands to identify portions of the source text (plaintext) which will be invisible for a human reader, using criteria based on text character and background colors, font size, overlapping characters, etc. Moreover, text deemed visible (covertext) is reconstructed from rendering commands and then the character reading order is identified, which could differ from the rendering order. The detection and resolution of hidden salting is evaluated on two e-mail corpora, and the effectiveness of this method in spam filtering task is assessed. We provide a solution to a relevant open problem in content filtering applications, namely the presence of tricks aimed at circumventing automatic filters. Marie-Francine Moens, Jan De Beer, Erik Boiy, Juan-Carlos Gomez 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 2 |
| 2008 | Anticipating Hidden Text Salting in Emails
Christina Lioma, Marie-Francine Moens, Juan-Carlos Gomez 0001, Jan De Beer, André Bergholz, Gerhard Paass, Patrick Horkan |
RAID | 4 |
| 2006 | Intelligent Information Retrieval Tools for Police
Nishant Kumar 0004, Jan De Beer, Jan Vanthienen, Marie-Francine Moens |
ISI | 2 |
| 2006 | Evaluation of Information Retrieval and Text Mining Tools on Automatic Named Entity Extraction
Nishant Kumar 0004, Jan De Beer, Jan Vanthienen, Marie-Francine Moens |
ISI | 2 |
| 2006 | Rpref: a generalization of Bpref towards graded relevance judgmentsabstractWe present rpref ; our generalization of the bpref evaluation metric for assessing the quality of search engine results, given graded rather than binary user relevance judgments. Jan De Beer, Marie-Francine Moens |
SIGIR | 1 |