Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jan De Beer

dblp:60/773 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 5Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Digital forensics and information hiding · 62% Network security · 38%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding
information hiding
0.112010
Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text Salting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.112006
Rpref: a generalization of Bpref towards graded relevance judgments · SIGIR 2006
Network security
content filtering
0.012010
Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text Salting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010
Network security › content filtering
spam filtering
0.012010
Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text Salting · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2010
Information retrieval › evaluation
relevance judgment
0.012006
Rpref: a generalization of Bpref towards graded relevance judgments · SIGIR 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rendering command analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 New filtering approaches for phishing email
abstract
Phishing emails usually contain a message from a credible looking source requesting a user to click a link to a website where she/he is asked to enter a password or other confidential information. Most phishing emails aim at withdrawing money from financial institutions or getting access to private information. Phishing has increased enormously over the last years and is a serious threat to global security and economy. There are a number of possible countermeasures to phishing. These range from communication-oriented approaches like authentication protocols over blacklisting to content-based filtering approaches. We argue that the first two approaches are currently not broadly implemented or exhibit deficits. Therefore content-based phishing filters are necessary and widely used to increase communication security. A number of features are extracted capturing the content and structural properties of the email. Subsequently a statistical classifier is trained using these features on a training set of emails labeled as ham (legitimate), spam or phishing. This classifier may then be applied to an email stream to estimate the classes of new incoming emails. In this paper we describe a number of novel features that are particularly well-suited to identify phishing emails. These include statistical models for the low-dimensional descriptions of email topics, sequential analysis of email text and external links, the detection of embedded logos as well as indicators for hidden salting. Hidden salting is the intentional addition or distortion of content not perceivable by the reader. For empirical evaluation we have obtained a large realistic corpus of emails prelabeled as spam, phishing, and ham (legitimate). In experiments our methods outperform other published approaches for classifying phishing emails. We discuss the implications of these results for the practical application of this approach in the workflow of an email provider. Finally we describe a strategy how the filters may be updated and adapted to new types of phishing.
André Bergholz, Jan De Beer, Sebastian Glahn, Marie-Francine Moens, Gerhard Paass, Siehyun Strobel
J. Comput. Secur.2
2010 Identifying and Resolving Hidden Text Salting
abstract
Hidden salting in digital media involves the intentional addition or distortion of content patterns with the purpose of content filtering. We propose a method to detect portions of a digital text source which are invisible to the end user, when they are rendered on a visual medium (like a computer monitor). The method consists of “tapping” into the rendering process and analyzing the rendering commands to identify portions of the source text (plaintext) which will be invisible for a human reader, using criteria based on text character and background colors, font size, overlapping characters, etc. Moreover, text deemed visible (covertext) is reconstructed from rendering commands and then the character reading order is identified, which could differ from the rendering order. The detection and resolution of hidden salting is evaluated on two e-mail corpora, and the effectiveness of this method in spam filtering task is assessed. We provide a solution to a relevant open problem in content filtering applications, namely the presence of tricks aimed at circumventing automatic filters.
Marie-Francine Moens, Jan De Beer, Erik Boiy, Juan-Carlos Gomez 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2008 Anticipating Hidden Text Salting in Emails
Christina Lioma, Marie-Francine Moens, Juan-Carlos Gomez 0001, Jan De Beer, André Bergholz, Gerhard Paass, Patrick Horkan
RAID4
2006 Intelligent Information Retrieval Tools for Police
Nishant Kumar 0004, Jan De Beer, Jan Vanthienen, Marie-Francine Moens
ISI2
2006 Evaluation of Information Retrieval and Text Mining Tools on Automatic Named Entity Extraction
Nishant Kumar 0004, Jan De Beer, Jan Vanthienen, Marie-Francine Moens
ISI2
2006 Rpref: a generalization of Bpref towards graded relevance judgments
abstract
We present rpref ; our generalization of the bpref evaluation metric for assessing the quality of search engine results, given graded rather than binary user relevance judgments.
Jan De Beer, Marie-Francine Moens
SIGIR1