Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xin Yi 0005
dblp:60/8079-5
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-8546-0580ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 67% Image and video processing · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016 |
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
sharpness metric |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-scale inference · 0.2local binary pattern · 0.2image matting · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review
Xin Yi 0005, Ekta Walia, Paul S. Babyn |
Medical Image Anal. | 1 |
| 2016 | LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus BlurabstractDefocus blur is extremely common in images captured using optical imaging systems. It may be undesirable, but may also be an intentional artistic effect, thus it can either enhance or inhibit our visual perception of the image scene. For tasks, such as image restoration and object recognition, one might want to segment a partially blurred image into blurred and non-blurred regions. In this paper, we propose a sharpness metric based on local binary patterns and a robust segmentation algorithm to separate in- and out-of-focus image regions. The proposed sharpness metric exploits the observation that most local image patches in blurry regions have significantly fewer of certain local binary patterns compared with those in sharp regions. Using this metric together with image matting and multi-scale inference, we obtained high-quality sharpness maps. Tests on hundreds of partially blurred images were used to evaluate our blur segmentation algorithm and six comparator methods. The results show that our algorithm achieves comparative segmentation results with the state of the art and have big speed advantage over the others. Xin Yi 0005, Mark G. Eramian |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |