Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xin Yi 0005

dblp:60/8079-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-8546-0580ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 67% Image and video processing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.212016
LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.212016
LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
sharpness metric
0.212016
LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-scale inference · 0.2local binary pattern · 0.2image matting · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: A review
Xin Yi 0005, Ekta Walia, Paul S. Babyn
Medical Image Anal.1
2016 LBP-Based Segmentation of Defocus Blur
abstract
Defocus blur is extremely common in images captured using optical imaging systems. It may be undesirable, but may also be an intentional artistic effect, thus it can either enhance or inhibit our visual perception of the image scene. For tasks, such as image restoration and object recognition, one might want to segment a partially blurred image into blurred and non-blurred regions. In this paper, we propose a sharpness metric based on local binary patterns and a robust segmentation algorithm to separate in- and out-of-focus image regions. The proposed sharpness metric exploits the observation that most local image patches in blurry regions have significantly fewer of certain local binary patterns compared with those in sharp regions. Using this metric together with image matting and multi-scale inference, we obtained high-quality sharpness maps. Tests on hundreds of partially blurred images were used to evaluate our blur segmentation algorithm and six comparator methods. The results show that our algorithm achieves comparative segmentation results with the state of the art and have big speed advantage over the others.
Xin Yi 0005, Mark G. Eramian
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1