Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David R. Strip

dblp:61/3187 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Robot manipulation · 57% Motion planning and robot control · 43%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › assembly
peg insertion
0.021989
A passive mechanism for insertion of convex pegs · ICRA 1989
Insertions using geometric analysis and hybrid force-position control: method and analysis · ICRA 1988
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › compliant motion control
hybrid position/force control
0.021988
Insertions using geometric analysis and hybrid force-position control: method and analysis · ICRA 1988
Insertions Using Geometric Analysis and Hybrid Force-Position Control on a PUMA 560 with VAL II · AAAI 1987
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › underactuated robotics
crane control
0.011989
Swing-free transport of suspended objects: a general treatment · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1989
Robotics › Robot manipulation › compliant manipulation
passive compliance
0.011989
A passive mechanism for insertion of convex pegs · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot manipulation › assembly
insertion task
0.011987
Insertions Using Geometric Analysis and Hybrid Force-Position Control on a PUMA 560 with VAL II · AAAI 1987
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011987
Insertions Using Geometric Analysis and Hybrid Force-Position Control on a PUMA 560 with VAL II · AAAI 1987
Robotics › Robot manipulation › compliant manipulation
remote center compliance
0.011989
A passive mechanism for insertion of convex pegs · ICRA 1989
Robotics › Robot manipulation › assembly
compliant insertion
0.011988
Insertions using geometric analysis and hybrid force-position control: method and analysis · ICRA 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hybrid force-position control · 0.0geometric analysis · 0.0sensing system · 0.0force servoing · 0.0acceleration profile design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 A passive mechanism for insertion of convex pegs
abstract
The author expands on some recent results for more generalized insertions in robotics to develop and analyze a passive mechanism capable of inserting arbitrary convex shaped parts. He implemented the strategies of H. Inoue (1979) and S. Simunovic (1979) on a system comprised of commercially available components (a PUMA 560 robot and an Astek six-axis force-torque sensor). It was not possible to use either of these strategies to insert parts of even modest clearance due to the requirements for precision in force sensor measurements and in position measurements at the end of guarded moves. The author was successful, however, in using force-servoing of the PUMA to implement a remote center of compliance. With the PUMA and a servo-based remote center of compliance, he was able to insert chamfered 1 in. pegs with clearance of 0.001 in.>
David R. Strip
ICRA1
1989 Swing-free transport of suspended objects: a general treatment
abstract
It is shown that there is a family of control strategies that result in swing-free movement of objects suspended from a movable point (e.g. a bridge crane). While it is possible to control the swing with acceleration periods of arbitrary length, it is necessary in that case to know the period of the suspended object, which requires knowledge of the location of the object's center of mass. In a practical application of this result, the best strategy is to build a sensing system into the bridge and crane hook that allows the crane to recognize when the hook is directly below its support point. The control strategy is then to accelerate for one full period, which is recognized when the hook returns to the point directly below its support point. If the bridge continues to move at this velocity, the suspended object will not swing. To stop in a swing-free state, the crane begins to decelerate at the same rate as it accelerated, starting at a distance from its goal equal to the distance traveled while accelerating.>
David R. Strip
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.1
1988 Insertions using geometric analysis and hybrid force-position control: method and analysis
abstract
Techniques based on active compliance implemented with hybrid force-position control are presented which are capable of inserting a wide variety of shaped pegs. The forces encountered during the insertions are analyzed to determine what classes of shapes these techniques will consistently insert. The analysis also gives guidance in selecting parameters of these techniques for specific shapes. Particular attention is given to polygonal, convex polygonal, and smooth convex parts.>
David R. Strip
ICRA1
1987 Insertions Using Geometric Analysis and Hybrid Force-Position Control on a PUMA 560 with VAL II
David R. Strip
AAAI1