Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amir Navot

dblp:61/4422 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Learning theory · 58% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% Efficient and distributed learning · 12%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 68% Computational geometry · 18% Algorithms and data structures · 14%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.122004
Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004
Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
large-scale learning
0.112005
Query by Committee Made Real · NIPS 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.112005
Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural activity analysis
0.112005
Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
0.112005
Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical decision theory
bayes risk
0.012004
Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point · COLT 2004
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.012004
Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Learning theory
margin-based feature selection
0.012004
Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
margin theory
0.012004
Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
0.012004
Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point · COLT 2004
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › prototype learning
learning vector quantization
0.012002
Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
margin bounds
0.012002
Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
motor cortex decoding
0.012005
Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity · NIPS 2005
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.012004
Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
multiclass classification
0.012004
Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms · ICML 2004
Computational geometry › combinatorial geometry
centerpoint
0.012004
Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point · COLT 2004
Algorithms and data structures › classification
nearest neighbor classification
0.012002
Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm · NIPS 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

leave-one-out error · 0.1k-nearest neighbor · 0.1tukey depth · 0.1relief algorithm · 0.1margin criterion · 0.1gradient ascent · 0.1bayes decision theory · 0.1prototype selection · 0.1large margin training · 0.1low-dimensional projection · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1hit-and-run random walk · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Query by Committee Made Real
abstract
Training a learning algorithm is a costly task. A major goal of active learning is to reduce this cost. In this paper we introduce a new algorithm, KQBC, which is capable of actively learning large scale problems by using selective sampling. The algorithm overcomes the costly sampling step of the well known Query By Committee (QBC) algorithm by projecting onto a low dimensional space. KQBC also enables the use of kernels, providing a simple way of extending QBC to the non-linear scenario. Sampling the low dimension space is done using the hit and run random walk. We demonstrate the success of this novel algorithm by applying it to both artificial and a real world problems.
Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby
NIPS2
2005 Nearest Neighbor Based Feature Selection for Regression and its Application to Neural Activity
abstract
We present a non-linear, simple, yet effective, feature subset selection method for regression and use it in analyzing cortical neural activity. Our algorithm involves a feature-weighted version of the k-nearest-neighbor algorithm. It is able to capture complex dependency of the target func- tion on its input and makes use of the leave-one-out error as a natural regularization. We explain the characteristics of our algorithm on syn- thetic problems and use it in the context of predicting hand velocity from spikes recorded in motor cortex of a behaving monkey. By applying fea- ture selection we are able to improve prediction quality and suggest a novel way of exploring neural data.
Amir Navot, Lavi Shpigelman, Naftali Tishby, Eilon Vaadia
NIPS1
2004 Bayes and Tukey Meet at the Center Point
Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby
COLT2
2004 Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms
abstract
Feature selection is the task of choosing a small set out of a given set of features that capture the relevant properties of the data. In the context of supervised classification problems the relevance is determined by the given labels on the training data. A good choice of features is a key for building compact and accurate classifiers. In this paper we introduce a margin based feature selection criterion and apply it to measure the quality of sets of features. Using margins we devise novel selection algorithms for multi-class classification problems and provide theoretical generalization bound. We also study the well known Relief algorithm and show that it resembles a gradient ascent over our margin criterion. We apply our new algorithm to various datasets and show that our new Simba algorithm, which directly optimizes the margin, outperforms Relief.
Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby
ICML2
2002 Margin Analysis of the LVQ Algorithm
abstract
Prototypes based algorithms are commonly used to reduce the computa- tional complexity of Nearest-Neighbour (NN) classifiers. In this paper we discuss theoretical and algorithmical aspects of such algorithms. On the theory side, we present margin based generalization bounds that sug- gest that these kinds of classifiers can be more accurate then the 1-NN rule. Furthermore, we derived a training algorithm that selects a good set of prototypes using large margin principles. We also show that the 20 years old Learning Vector Quantization (LVQ) algorithm emerges natu- rally from our framework.
Koby Crammer, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Amir Navot, Naftali Tishby
NIPS3