Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Calvin Powers

dblp:61/5948 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
p3p
0.012002
The social contract core · WWW 2002
Privacy and data protection
privacy policy
0.012002
The social contract core · WWW 2002
Web and social media mining
online communities
0.012002
The social contract core · WWW 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

architectural design · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 From privacy promises to privacy management: a new approach for enforcing privacy throughout an enterprise
abstract
Regulations and consumer backlash force many organizations to re-evaluate the way they manage private data. As a first step, they publish privacy promises as text or P3P. These promises are not backed up by privacy technology that enforces the promises throughout the enterprise. Privacy tools cover fractions of the problem while leaving the main challenge unanswered.This article describes a new approach towards enterprise-wide enforcement of the privacy promises. Its core is a new framework for managing collected personal data in a sensitive, trustworthy way. The framework enables enterprises to publish clear privacy promises, to collect and manage user preferences and consent, and to enforce the privacy promises throughout the enterprise.One of the foundations of this framework is the "sticky policy paradigm" that defines a customer centric model for managing policies, preferences, and consent.
Paul Ashley, Calvin Powers, Matthias Schunter
NSPW2
2002 The social contract core
abstract
The information age has brought with it the promise of unprecedented economic growth based on the efficiencies made possible by new technology. This same greater efficiency has left society with less and less time to adapt to technological progress. Perhaps the greatest cost of this progress is the threat to privacy we all face from unconstrained exchange of our personal information. In response to this threat, the World Wide Web Consortium has introduced the "Platform for Privacy Preferences" (P3P) to allow sites to express policies in machine-readable form and to expose these policies to site visitors [1]. However, today P3P does not protect the privacy of individuals, nor does its implementation empower communities or groups to negotiate and establish standards of behavior. We propose a privacy architecture we call the Social Contract Core (SCC), designed to speed the establishment of new "Social Contracts" needed to protect private data. The goal of SCC is to empower communities, speed the "socialization" of new technology, and encourage the rapid access to, and exchange of, information. Addressing these issues is essential, we feel, to both liberty and economic prosperity in the information age[2].
James H. Kaufman, Stefan Edlund, Daniel Alexander Ford, Calvin Powers
WWW4