Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Behzod Sirjani

dblp:62/10949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 91% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › groupware
calendar sharing
0.212013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.212013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013
Collaborative and social computing › interpersonal relationships
intimate relationships
0.212013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
personal information management
0.012013
Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars · CSCW 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 0.2interview study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Recalibrating the ratio: enacting accountability in intimate relationships using shared calendars
abstract
This study enriches the understanding of relationship work in the context of calendar sharing by examining how people negotiate and enact accountability in their intimate relationships with and around their shared calendars. We conducted 13 semi-structured interviews as part of a qualitative study of Google Calendar users. Our research discovered how participants develop understandings of how close friends and significant others structure their time using shared calendars, as well as how people negotiate and enact accounts within and beyond their intimate relationships. Our findings indicate ways in which Online Calendar Systems (OCS) can be better designed to more effectively support users' needs.
Alexander Thayer, Behzod Sirjani, Charlotte P. Lee
CSCW2
2012 Book Review - Video in Qualitative Research, Christian Heath, Jon Hindmarsh and Paul Luff, Sage Publications, 2010, 184 pp. ISBN 978-1412929431
Behzod Sirjani
Comput. Support. Cooperative Work.1