Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Owen Ozier

dblp:62/3622 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › subnetwork detection
active subnetwork detection
0.012002
Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks · ISMB 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
molecular network analysis
0.012002
Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks · ISMB 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multi-omics data integration
gene expression data integration
0.012002
Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks · ISMB 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.0monte carlo method · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Discovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks
abstract
Abstract Motivation: In model organisms such as yeast, large databases of protein–protein and protein-DNA interactions have become an extremely important resource for the study of protein function, evolution, and gene regulatory dynamics. In this paper we demonstrate that by integrating these interactions with widely-available mRNA expression data, it is possible to generate concrete hypotheses for the underlying mechanisms governing the observed changes in gene expression. To perform this integration systematically and at large scale, we introduce an approach for screening a molecular interaction network to identify active subnetworks, i.e., connected regions of the network that show significant changes in expression over particular subsets of conditions. The method we present here combines a rigorous statistical measure for scoring subnetworks with a search algorithm for identifying subnetworks with high score. Results: We evaluated our procedure on a small network of 332 genes and 362 interactions and a large network of 4160 genes containing all 7462 protein–protein and protein-DNA interactions in the yeast public databases. In the case of the small network, we identified five significant subnetworks that covered 41 out of 77 (53%) of all significant changes in expression. Both network analyses returned several top-scoring subnetworks with good correspondence to known regulatory mechanisms in the literature. These results demonstrate how large-scale genomic approaches may be used to uncover signalling and regulatory pathways in a systematic, integrative fashion. Availability: The methods presented in this paper are implemented in the Cytoscape software package which is available to the academic community at http://www.cytoscape.org. Contact: [email protected] Keywords: molecular interactions; gene expression; data integration; simulated annealing; Monte carlo methods. *To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Trey Ideker, Owen Ozier, Benno Schwikowski, Andrew F. Siegel
ISMB2