Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dale Greenley

dblp:62/4240 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 34% Memory systems · 26% Electronic design automation · 13%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
cache design
0.011995
The design of the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I · Proc. IEEE 1995
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011995
UltraSPARC-I Emulation · DAC 1995
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › microprocessor design › processor core design
in-order execution
0.011995
The design of the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I · Proc. IEEE 1995
Memory systems
memory hierarchy
0.011995
The design of the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I · Proc. IEEE 1995
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
on-chip interconnect
0.011995
The design of the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I · Proc. IEEE 1995
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
processor emulation
0.011995
UltraSPARC-I Emulation · DAC 1995
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
superscalar processor
0.011995
The design of the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I · Proc. IEEE 1995
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › microprocessor design › processor core design
functional units
0.011995
The design of the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I · Proc. IEEE 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

microarchitecture tradeoff analysis · 0.0emulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 UltraSPARC-I Emulation
abstract
The next generation UltraSPARC-I CPU represents a significant step forward in processor performance at the cost of increased design complexity.Added complexity increases the risks in achieving functionally correct first silicon.Existing design verification techniques were supplemented by applying emulation to obtain an early look at functionality.Discussed are the goals, methods and results of the UltraSPARC-I emulation.
James Gateley, Miriam Blatt, Dennis Chen, Scott Cooke, Piyush Desai, Manjunath Doreswamy, Mark Elgood, Gary Feierbach, Tim Goldsbury, Dale Greenley, Raju Joshi, Mike Khosraviani, Robert Kwong, Manish Motwani, Chitresh Narasimhaiah, Sam J. Nicolino Jr., Tooru Ozeki, Gary Peterson, Chris Salzmann, Nasser Shayesteh, Jeffrey Whitman, Pak Wong
DAC10
1995 The design of the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I
abstract
The realization of a high performance modern microprocessor involves hundreds of person-years of conception, logic design, circuit design, layout drawing, etc. In order to leverage effectively the 5-10 millions of transistors available, careful microarchitecture tradeoff analysis must be performed. This paper describes not only the microarchitecture of UltraSPARC-I, a 167 MHz 64-b four-way superscalar processor, but more importantly it presents the analysis and tradeoffs that were made "en route" to the final chip. Among several issues, the in-order execution model is compared with alternatives, variations of the issue-width of the machine as well as the number of functional units are described, subtle features that are part of the memory hierarchy are explained, and the advantages of the packet-switched interconnect are exposed.
Marc Tremblay, Dale Greenley, Kevin Normoyle
Proc. IEEE2