Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nadia Payet

dblp:62/7272 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 34% Segmentation and scene understanding · 32% 3D vision · 24%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 91% Geometric modeling and processing · 9%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
object detection and segmentation
0.212013
Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013
Image and video processing › image segmentation
contour detection
0.212013
SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013
Image and video processing › edge analysis
edge labeling
0.212013
SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation
0.222013
(RF)^2 - Random Forest Random Field · NIPS 2010
Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › human pose estimation
3d pose estimation
0.112011
From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimation · ICCV 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.112011
Scene shape from texture of objects · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.112011
From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimation · ICCV 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation
0.112011
From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimation · ICCV 2011
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding
0.112011
Scene shape from texture of objects · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction › shape from x
shape from texture
0.112011
Scene shape from texture of objects · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object discovery
0.112010
From a Set of Shapes to Object Discovery · ECCV (5) 2010
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.112010
(RF)^2 - Random Forest Random Field · NIPS 2010
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.112009
Dictionary-free categorization of very similar objects via stacked evidence trees · CVPR 2009
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification
0.112009
Dictionary-free categorization of very similar objects via stacked evidence trees · CVPR 2009
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
boundary detection
0.012013
SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field
0.012013
Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.012010
From a Set of Shapes to Object Discovery · ECCV (5) 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential labeling · 0.3random forest · 0.2reversible jump MCMC · 0.2nonparametric estimation · 0.2metropolis-hastings algorithm · 0.2reinforcement learning · 0.1object detection · 0.1deformable grid matching · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1bag-of-boundaries · 0.1shape analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2013 Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and Segmentation
abstract
This paper presents a new computational framework for detecting and segmenting object occurrences in images. We combine Hough forest (HF) and conditional random field (CRF) into HFRF to assign labels of object classes to image regions. HF captures intrinsic and contextual properties of objects. CRF then fuses the labeling hypotheses generated by HF for identifying every object occurrence. Interaction between HF and CRF happens in HFRF inference, which uses the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The Metropolis-Hastings reversible jumps depend on two ratios of proposal and posterior distributions. Instead of estimating four distributions, we directly compute the two ratios using HF. In leaf nodes, HF records class histograms of training examples and information about their configurations. This evidence is used in inference for nonparametric estimation of the two distribution ratios. Our empirical evaluation on benchmark datasets demonstrates higher average precision rates of object detection, smaller object segmentation error, and faster convergence rates of our inference, relative to the state of the art. The paper also presents theoretical error bounds of HF and HFRF applied to a two-class object detection and segmentation.
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2011 Scene shape from texture of objects
abstract
Joint reasoning about objects and 3D scene layout has shown great promise in scene interpretation. One visual cue that has been overlooked is texture arising from a spatial repetition of objects in the scene (e.g., windows of a building). Such texture provides scene-specific constraints among objects, and thus facilitates scene interpretation. We present an approach to: (1) detecting distinct textures of objects in a scene, (2) reconstructing the 3D shape of detected texture surfaces, and (3) combining object detections and shape-from-texture toward a globally consistent scene interpretation. Inference is formulated within the reinforcement learning framework as a sequential interpretation of image regions, starting from confident regions to guide the interpretation of other regions. Our algorithm finds an optimal policy that maps states of detected objects and reconstructed surfaces to actions which ought to be taken in those states, including detecting new objects and identifying new textures, so as to minimize a long-term loss. Tests against ground truth obtained from stereo images demonstrate that we can coarsely reconstruct a 3D model of the scene from a single image, without learning the layout of common scene surfaces, as done in prior work. We also show that reasoning about texture of objects improves object detection.
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic
CVPR1
2011 From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimation
abstract
This paper addresses view-invariant object detection and pose estimation from a single image. While recent work focuses on object-centered representations of point-based object features, we revisit the viewer-centered framework, and use image contours as basic features. Given training examples of arbitrary views of an object, we learn a sparse object model in terms of a few view-dependent shape templates. The shape templates are jointly used for detecting object occurrences and estimating their 3D poses in a new image. Instrumental to this is our new mid-level feature, called bag of boundaries (BOB), aimed at lifting from individual edges toward their more informative summaries for identifying object boundaries amidst the background clutter. In inference, BOBs are placed on deformable grids both in the image and the shape templates, and then matched. This is formulated as a convex optimization problem that accommodates invariance to non-rigid, locally affine shape deformations. Evaluation on benchmark datasets demonstrates our competitive results relative to the state of the art.
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic
ICCV1
2010 From a Set of Shapes to Object Discovery
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic
ECCV (5)1
2010 (RF)^2 - Random Forest Random Field
abstract
We combine random forest (RF) and conditional random field (CRF) into a new computational framework, called random forest random field (RF)^2. Inference of (RF)^2 uses the Swendsen-Wang cut algorithm, characterized by Metropolis-Hastings jumps. A jump from one state to another depends on the ratio of the proposal distributions, and on the ratio of the posterior distributions of the two states. Prior work typically resorts to a parametric estimation of these four distributions, and then computes their ratio. Our key idea is to instead directly estimate these ratios using RF. RF collects in leaf nodes of each decision tree the class histograms of training examples. We use these class histograms for a non-parametric estimation of the distribution ratios. We derive the theoretical error bounds of a two-class (RF)^2. (RF)^2 is applied to a challenging task of multiclass object recognition and segmentation over a random field of input image regions. In our empirical evaluation, we use only the visual information provided by image regions (e.g., color, texture, spatial layout), whereas the competing methods additionally use higher-level cues about the horizon location and 3D layout of surfaces in the scene. Nevertheless, (RF)^2 outperforms the state of the art on benchmark datasets, in terms of accuracy and computation time.
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic
NIPS1
2009 Dictionary-free categorization of very similar objects via stacked evidence trees
abstract
Current work in object categorization discriminates among objects that typically possess gross differences which are readily apparent. However, many applications require making much finer distinctions. We address an insect categorization problem that is so challenging that even trained human experts cannot readily categorize images of insects considered in this paper. The state of the art that uses visual dictionaries, when applied to this problem, yields mediocre results (16.1% error). Three possible explanations for this are (a) the dictionaries are unsupervised, (b) the dictionaries lose the detailed information contained in each keypoint, and (c) these methods rely on hand-engineered decisions about dictionary size. This paper presents a novel, dictionary-free methodology. A random forest of trees is first trained to predict the class of an image based on individual keypoint descriptors. A unique aspect of these trees is that they do not make decisions but instead merely record evidence-i.e., the number of descriptors from training examples of each category that reached each leaf of the tree. We provide a mathematical model showing that voting evidence is better than voting decisions. To categorize a new image, descriptors for all detected keypoints are “dropped” through the trees, and the evidence at each leaf is summed to obtain an overall evidence vector. This is then sent to a second-level classifier to make the categorization decision. We achieve excellent performance (6.4% error) on the 9-class STONEFLY9 data set. Also, our method achieves an average AUC of 0.921 on the PASCAL06 VOC, which places it fifth out of 21 methods reported in the literature and demonstrates that the method also works well for generic object categorization.
Gonzalo Martínez-Muñoz, Natalia Larios, Eric N. Mortensen, Wei Zhang 0014, Asako Yamamuro, Robert Paasch, Nadia Payet, David A. Lytle, Linda G. Shapiro, Sinisa Todorovic, Andrew Moldenke, Thomas G. Dietterich
CVPR7