Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nadia Payet
dblp:62/7272
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 34% Segmentation and scene understanding · 32% 3D vision · 24% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 91% Geometric modeling and processing · 9% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
object detection and segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
contour detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013 |
Image and video processing › edge analysis
edge labeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
image segmentation |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | (RF)^2 - Random Forest Random Field · NIPS 2010 Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › human pose estimation
3d pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimation · ICCV 2011 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Scene shape from texture of objects · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimation · ICCV 2011 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimation · ICCV 2011 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Scene shape from texture of objects · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape reconstruction › shape from x
shape from texture |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Scene shape from texture of objects · CVPR 2011 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object discovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | From a Set of Shapes to Object Discovery · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | (RF)^2 - Random Forest Random Field · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Dictionary-free categorization of very similar objects via stacked evidence trees · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Dictionary-free categorization of very similar objects via stacked evidence trees · CVPR 2009 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
boundary detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction
conditional random field |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and Segmentation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2013 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | From a Set of Shapes to Object Discovery · ECCV (5) 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential labeling · 0.3random forest · 0.2reversible jump MCMC · 0.2nonparametric estimation · 0.2metropolis-hastings algorithm · 0.2reinforcement learning · 0.1object detection · 0.1deformable grid matching · 0.1convex optimization · 0.1bag-of-boundaries · 0.1shape analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | SLEDGE: Sequential Labeling of Image Edges for Boundary Detection
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic |
Int. J. Comput. Vis. | 1 |
| 2013 | Hough Forest Random Field for Object Recognition and SegmentationabstractThis paper presents a new computational framework for detecting and segmenting object occurrences in images. We combine Hough forest (HF) and conditional random field (CRF) into HFRF to assign labels of object classes to image regions. HF captures intrinsic and contextual properties of objects. CRF then fuses the labeling hypotheses generated by HF for identifying every object occurrence. Interaction between HF and CRF happens in HFRF inference, which uses the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. The Metropolis-Hastings reversible jumps depend on two ratios of proposal and posterior distributions. Instead of estimating four distributions, we directly compute the two ratios using HF. In leaf nodes, HF records class histograms of training examples and information about their configurations. This evidence is used in inference for nonparametric estimation of the two distribution ratios. Our empirical evaluation on benchmark datasets demonstrates higher average precision rates of object detection, smaller object segmentation error, and faster convergence rates of our inference, relative to the state of the art. The paper also presents theoretical error bounds of HF and HFRF applied to a two-class object detection and segmentation. Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2011 | Scene shape from texture of objectsabstractJoint reasoning about objects and 3D scene layout has shown great promise in scene interpretation. One visual cue that has been overlooked is texture arising from a spatial repetition of objects in the scene (e.g., windows of a building). Such texture provides scene-specific constraints among objects, and thus facilitates scene interpretation. We present an approach to: (1) detecting distinct textures of objects in a scene, (2) reconstructing the 3D shape of detected texture surfaces, and (3) combining object detections and shape-from-texture toward a globally consistent scene interpretation. Inference is formulated within the reinforcement learning framework as a sequential interpretation of image regions, starting from confident regions to guide the interpretation of other regions. Our algorithm finds an optimal policy that maps states of detected objects and reconstructed surfaces to actions which ought to be taken in those states, including detecting new objects and identifying new textures, so as to minimize a long-term loss. Tests against ground truth obtained from stereo images demonstrate that we can coarsely reconstruct a 3D model of the scene from a single image, without learning the layout of common scene surfaces, as done in prior work. We also show that reasoning about texture of objects improves object detection. Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2011 | From contours to 3D object detection and pose estimationabstractThis paper addresses view-invariant object detection and pose estimation from a single image. While recent work focuses on object-centered representations of point-based object features, we revisit the viewer-centered framework, and use image contours as basic features. Given training examples of arbitrary views of an object, we learn a sparse object model in terms of a few view-dependent shape templates. The shape templates are jointly used for detecting object occurrences and estimating their 3D poses in a new image. Instrumental to this is our new mid-level feature, called bag of boundaries (BOB), aimed at lifting from individual edges toward their more informative summaries for identifying object boundaries amidst the background clutter. In inference, BOBs are placed on deformable grids both in the image and the shape templates, and then matched. This is formulated as a convex optimization problem that accommodates invariance to non-rigid, locally affine shape deformations. Evaluation on benchmark datasets demonstrates our competitive results relative to the state of the art. Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2010 | From a Set of Shapes to Object Discovery
Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic |
ECCV (5) | 1 |
| 2010 | (RF)^2 - Random Forest Random FieldabstractWe combine random forest (RF) and conditional random field (CRF) into a new computational framework, called random forest random field (RF)^2. Inference of (RF)^2 uses the Swendsen-Wang cut algorithm, characterized by Metropolis-Hastings jumps. A jump from one state to another depends on the ratio of the proposal distributions, and on the ratio of the posterior distributions of the two states. Prior work typically resorts to a parametric estimation of these four distributions, and then computes their ratio. Our key idea is to instead directly estimate these ratios using RF. RF collects in leaf nodes of each decision tree the class histograms of training examples. We use these class histograms for a non-parametric estimation of the distribution ratios. We derive the theoretical error bounds of a two-class (RF)^2. (RF)^2 is applied to a challenging task of multiclass object recognition and segmentation over a random field of input image regions. In our empirical evaluation, we use only the visual information provided by image regions (e.g., color, texture, spatial layout), whereas the competing methods additionally use higher-level cues about the horizon location and 3D layout of surfaces in the scene. Nevertheless, (RF)^2 outperforms the state of the art on benchmark datasets, in terms of accuracy and computation time. Nadia Payet, Sinisa Todorovic |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2009 | Dictionary-free categorization of very similar objects via stacked evidence treesabstractCurrent work in object categorization discriminates among objects that typically possess gross differences which are readily apparent. However, many applications require making much finer distinctions. We address an insect categorization problem that is so challenging that even trained human experts cannot readily categorize images of insects considered in this paper. The state of the art that uses visual dictionaries, when applied to this problem, yields mediocre results (16.1% error). Three possible explanations for this are (a) the dictionaries are unsupervised, (b) the dictionaries lose the detailed information contained in each keypoint, and (c) these methods rely on hand-engineered decisions about dictionary size. This paper presents a novel, dictionary-free methodology. A random forest of trees is first trained to predict the class of an image based on individual keypoint descriptors. A unique aspect of these trees is that they do not make decisions but instead merely record evidence-i.e., the number of descriptors from training examples of each category that reached each leaf of the tree. We provide a mathematical model showing that voting evidence is better than voting decisions. To categorize a new image, descriptors for all detected keypoints are “dropped” through the trees, and the evidence at each leaf is summed to obtain an overall evidence vector. This is then sent to a second-level classifier to make the categorization decision. We achieve excellent performance (6.4% error) on the 9-class STONEFLY9 data set. Also, our method achieves an average AUC of 0.921 on the PASCAL06 VOC, which places it fifth out of 21 methods reported in the literature and demonstrates that the method also works well for generic object categorization. Gonzalo Martínez-Muñoz, Natalia Larios, Eric N. Mortensen, Wei Zhang 0014, Asako Yamamuro, Robert Paasch, Nadia Payet, David A. Lytle, Linda G. Shapiro, Sinisa Todorovic, Andrew Moldenke, Thomas G. Dietterich |
CVPR | 7 |