Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Roman Ratnaweera

dblp:62/8365 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
fish-fin propulsion
0.112010
Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
underwater propulsion
0.112010
Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics
0.112010
Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
autonomous underwater vehicle
0.012010
Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

force measurement · 0.1fluid dynamics modeling · 0.1camshaft mechanism · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system
abstract
In search of underwater locomotion methods as alternatives to propellers, systems relying on the propagation of waves along a fin have already been designed and evaluated by several scientists. Considerable effort has been undertaken to optimise their efficiency both by fluid dynamic analysis and experiments on physical prototypes. One drawback of the systems hitherto has been their electro-mechanical complexity in that they required many actuators and refined control strategies to generate the desired fin undulation. Our approach has been to translate the result of these optimisations into a simpler, purely mechanical model relying on the principle of camshafts to achieve a similar undulatory fin motion. The goal was to evaluate whether this type of propulsion system is feasible and whether it was a viable alternative to propellers in Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. The prototype built during the project, CUTTLEFIN, reached comparable speeds to other undulating robot solutions. Force measurements also showed that the thrust produced is in qualitative accordance to a simplified fluid dynamics model. This makes the camshaft approach a promising option for generating an undulating wave in a membrane-based fin propulsion system, if one is willing to pay the price of lower flexibility compared to current dexterously actuated solutions.
Benjamin Matthias Peter, Roman Ratnaweera, Wolfgang Fischer 0003, Cédric Pradalier, Roland Siegwart
ICRA2