Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Roman Ratnaweera
dblp:62/8365
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
fish-fin propulsion |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
underwater propulsion |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
autonomous underwater vehicle |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion system · ICRA 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
force measurement · 0.1fluid dynamics modeling · 0.1camshaft mechanism · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Design and evaluation of a fin-based underwater propulsion systemabstractIn search of underwater locomotion methods as alternatives to propellers, systems relying on the propagation of waves along a fin have already been designed and evaluated by several scientists. Considerable effort has been undertaken to optimise their efficiency both by fluid dynamic analysis and experiments on physical prototypes. One drawback of the systems hitherto has been their electro-mechanical complexity in that they required many actuators and refined control strategies to generate the desired fin undulation. Our approach has been to translate the result of these optimisations into a simpler, purely mechanical model relying on the principle of camshafts to achieve a similar undulatory fin motion. The goal was to evaluate whether this type of propulsion system is feasible and whether it was a viable alternative to propellers in Autonomous Underwater Vehicles. The prototype built during the project, CUTTLEFIN, reached comparable speeds to other undulating robot solutions. Force measurements also showed that the thrust produced is in qualitative accordance to a simplified fluid dynamics model. This makes the camshaft approach a promising option for generating an undulating wave in a membrane-based fin propulsion system, if one is willing to pay the price of lower flexibility compared to current dexterously actuated solutions. Benjamin Matthias Peter, Roman Ratnaweera, Wolfgang Fischer 0003, Cédric Pradalier, Roland Siegwart |
ICRA | 2 |