Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ashay Rane
dblp:63/10367
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 56% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 44% | |
| Network and information security
3 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 55% Hardware security and side channels · 22% Systems and software security · 22% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
dataflow architecture |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Think Fast: A Tensor Streaming Processor (TSP) for Accelerating Deep Learning Workloads · ISCA 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Think Fast: A Tensor Streaming Processor (TSP) for Accelerating Deep Learning Workloads · ISCA 2020 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › tensor accelerator
tensor streaming processor |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Think Fast: A Tensor Streaming Processor (TSP) for Accelerating Deep Learning Workloads · ISCA 2020 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic implementation
cryptographic implementation verification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Vale: Verifying High-Performance Cryptographic Assembly Code · USENIX Security Symposium 2017 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic implementation
constant-time implementation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Secure, Precise, and Fast Floating-Point Operations on x86 Processors · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Secure, Precise, and Fast Floating-Point Operations on x86 Processors · USENIX Security Symposium 2016 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel countermeasures |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Raccoon: Closing Digital Side-Channels through Obfuscated Execution · USENIX Security Symposium 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal verification · 1.1producer-consumer stream programming · 0.9dataflow locality · 0.9execution obfuscation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Think Fast: A Tensor Streaming Processor (TSP) for Accelerating Deep Learning WorkloadsabstractIn this paper, we introduce the Tensor Streaming Processor (TSP) architecture, a functionally-sliced microarchitecture with memory units interleaved with vector and matrix deep learning functional units in order to take advantage of dataflow locality of deep learning operations. The TSP is built based on two key observations: (1) machine learning workloads exhibit abundant data parallelism, which can be readily mapped to tensors in hardware, and (2) a simple and deterministic processor with producer-consumer stream programming model enables precise reasoning and control of hardware components, achieving good performance and power efficiency. The TSP is designed to exploit parallelism inherent in machine-learning workloads including instruction-level, memory concurrency, data and model parallelism, while guaranteeing determinism by eliminating all reactive elements in the hardware (e.g. arbiters, and caches). Early ResNet50 image classification results demonstrate 20.4K processed images per second (IPS) with a batch-size of one— a $4 \times$ improvement compared to other modern GPUs and accelerators [44]. Our first ASIC implementation of the TSP architecture yields a computational density of more than 1 TeraOp/s per square mm of silicon for its $25 \times 29$ mm 14nm chip operating at a nominal clock frequency of 900 MHz. The TSP demonstrates a novel hardware-software approach to achieve fast, yet predictable, performance on machine-learning workloads within a desired power envelope. Dennis Abts, Jonathan Ross, Jonathan Sparling, Mark Wong-VanHaren, Max Baker, Tom Hawkins, Temesghen Kahsai, Garrin Kimmell, Jennifer Hwang, Rebekah Leslie-Hurd, Michael Bye, E. R. Creswick, Matthew Boyd, Mahitha Venigalla, Evan Laforge, Jon Purdy, Purushotham Kamath, Dinesh Maheshwari, Michael Beidler, Geert Rosseel, Omar Ahmad, Gleb Gagarin, Richard Czekalski, Ashay Rane, Sahil Parmar, Jeff Werner, Jim Sproch, Adrián Macías, Brian Kurtz |
ISCA | 26 |
| 2018 | MicroStache: A Lightweight Execution Context for In-Process Safe Region Isolation
Lucian Mogosanu, Ashay Rane, Nathan Dautenhahn |
RAID | 2 |
| 2017 | Vale: Verifying High-Performance Cryptographic Assembly Code
Barry Bond, Chris Hawblitzel, Manos Kapritsos, K. Rustan M. Leino, Jacob R. Lorch, Bryan Parno, Ashay Rane, Srinath Setty, Laure Thompson |
USENIX Security Symposium | 7 |
| 2016 | Secure, Precise, and Fast Floating-Point Operations on x86 Processors
Ashay Rane, Calvin Lin, Mohit Tiwari |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2015 | Raccoon: Closing Digital Side-Channels through Obfuscated Execution
Ashay Rane, Calvin Lin, Mohit Tiwari |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2012 | Enhancing performance optimization of multicore chips and multichip nodes with data structure metricsabstractProgram performance optimization is usually based solely on measurements of execution behavior of code segments using hardware performance counters. However, memory access patterns are critical performance limiting factors for today's multicore chips where performance is highly memory bound. Therefore diagnoses and selection of optimizations based only on measurements of the execution behavior of code segments are incomplete because they do not incorporate knowledge of memory access patterns and behaviors. This paper presents a low-overhead tool (MACPO) that captures memory traces and computes metrics for the memory access behavior of source-level (C, C++, Fortran) data structures. It also presents a complete process for integrating code segment-based and memory access pattern measurements and analyses for performance optimization specifically targeting multicore chips and multichip nodes of clusters. MACPO explicitly targets the measurement and metrics important to performance optimization for multicore chips. MACPO uses more realistic cache models for computation of latency metrics than those used by previous tools. Evaluation of the effectiveness of adding memory access behavior characteristics of data structures to performance optimization was done on subsets of the ASCI, NAS and Rodina parallel benchmarks and one application program from a domain not represented in these benchmarks. Adding memory behavior characteristics enabled easier diagnoses of bottlenecks and more accurate selection of appropriate optimizations than with only code centric behavior measurements. The performance gains ranged from a few percent to 38 percent. Ashay Rane, James C. Browne |
PACT | 1 |
| 2011 | Performance Optimization of Data Structures Using Memory Access CharacterizationabstractProgram performance optimization is generally based on measurements of execution behavior of code segments. However, an equally important task for performance optimizations is understanding memory access behaviors and thus, data structure access patterns and properties. Because memory-related problems in multi-core applications can have a significant impact on overall performance, optimizations in data access patterns will likely give a big boost to application performance. But effective diagnosis of performance bottlenecks requires that the memory measurements be related to high-level data structures (C, C++ arrays, structures, etc.). In this work, we present a low-overhead tool that captures memory traces and computes several metrics for performance characteristics of source-level data structures. Explicit consideration is given to measurement and diagnosis for multicore chips. Case studies which include (manual) use of the data structure memory access metrics to select and implement optimizations are given. Ashay Rane, James C. Browne |
CLUSTER | 1 |