Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
J. Benton 0001
dblp:63/2238-1
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 70% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 18% Efficient and distributed learning · 8% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 50% Debugging and program repair · 50% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › temporal planning
dynamic controllability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
temporal planning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
tree search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural Networks · AAAI 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
belief revision |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Maintaining Evolving Domain Models · IJCAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model maintenance |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Maintaining Evolving Domain Models · IJCAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology evolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Maintaining Evolving Domain Models · IJCAI 2016 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
open-world planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Integrating a Closed World Planner with an Open World Robot: A Case Study · AAAI 2010 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Integrating a Closed World Planner with an Open World Robot: A Case Study · AAAI 2010 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
anytime search |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Anytime heuristic search for partial satisfaction planning · Artif. Intell. 2009 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Anytime heuristic search for partial satisfaction planning · Artif. Intell. 2009 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning with preferences
partial satisfaction planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Anytime heuristic search for partial satisfaction planning · Artif. Intell. 2009 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › nonmonotonic reasoning › preference handling
preference reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Planning with Goal Utility Dependencies · IJCAI 2007 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › hierarchical planning
hierarchical task network learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | HACKAR: Helpful Advice for Code Knowledge and Attack Resilience · AAAI 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning with preferences
oversubscription planning |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Over-Subscription Planning with Numeric Goals · IJCAI 2005 |
Human-robot interaction › service robot
search and rescue |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Tell me when and why to do it!: run-time planner model updates via natural language instruction · HRI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 0.6program analysis · 0.4hierarchical task network learning · 0.4truth maintenance · 0.2belief revision · 0.2natural language instruction · 0.1soft goal handling · 0.1sensing actions · 0.1closed-world planner · 0.1planning with preferences · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Solving Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty under Restricted Time-Based Controllability Using Tree Search and Graph Neural NetworksabstractScheduling under uncertainty is an area of interest in artificial intelligence. We study the problem of Dynamic Controllability (DC) of Disjunctive Temporal Networks with Uncertainty (DTNU), which seeks a reactive scheduling strategy to satisfy temporal constraints in response to uncontrollable action durations. We introduce new semantics for reactive scheduling: Time-based Dynamic Controllability (TDC) and a restricted subset of TDC, R-TDC. We present a tree search approach to determine whether or not a DTNU is R-TDC. Moreover, we leverage the learning capability of a Graph Neural Network (GNN) as a heuristic for tree search guidance. Finally, we conduct experiments on a known benchmark on which we show R-TDC to retain significant completeness with regard to DC, while being faster to prove. This results in the tree search processing fifty percent more DTNU problems in R-TDC than the state-of-the-art DC solver does in DC with the same time budget. We also observe that GNN tree search guidance leads to substantial performance gains on benchmarks of more complex DTNUs, with up to eleven times more problems solved than the baseline tree search. Kevin Osanlou, Jeremy Frank, Andrei Bursuc, Tristan Cazenave, Éric Jacopin, Christophe Guettier, J. Benton 0001 |
AAAI | 7 |
| 2016 | Maintaining Evolving Domain Models
Daniel Bryce, J. Benton 0001, Michael W. Boldt |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2015 | HACKAR: Helpful Advice for Code Knowledge and Attack ResilienceabstractThis paper describes a novel combination of Java program analysis and automated learning and planning architecture to the domain of Java vulnerability analysis. The key feature of our “HACKAR: Helpful Advice for Code Knowledge and Attack Resilience” system is its ability to analyze Java programs at development-time, identifying vulnerabilities and ways to avoid them. HACKAR uses an improved version of NASA’s Java PathFinder (JPF) to execute Java programs and identify vulnerabilities. The system features new Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) learning algorithms that (1) advance stateof-theart HTN learners with reasoning about numeric constraints, failures, and more general cases of recursion, and (2) contribute to problem-solving by learning a hierarchical dataflow representation of the program from the inputs of the program. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that HACKAR was able to suggest fixes for all of our test program suites. It also shows that HACKAR can analyze programs with string inputs that original JPF implementation cannot. Ugur Kuter, Mark H. Burstein, J. Benton 0001, Daniel Bryce, Jordan Tyler Thayer, Steve McCoy |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2012 | Tell me when and why to do it!: run-time planner model updates via natural language instructionabstractRobots are currently being used in and developed for critical HRI applications such as search and rescue. In these scenarios, humans operating under changeable and high-stress conditions must communicate effectively with autonomous agents, necessitating that such agents be able to respond quickly and effectively to rapidly-changing conditions and expectations. We demonstrate a robot planner that is able to utilize new information, specifically information originating in spoken input produced by human operators. Rehj Cantrell, Kartik Talamadupula, Paul W. Schermerhorn, J. Benton 0001, Subbarao Kambhampati, Matthias Scheutz |
HRI | 4 |
| 2012 | Better Parameter-Free Anytime Search by Minimizing Time Between SolutionsabstractThis paper presents a new anytime search algorithm, anytime explicitestimation search (AEES). AEES is an anytime search algorithm which attempts to minimize the time between improvements to its incumbent solution by taking advantage of the differences between solution cost and length. We provide an argument that minimizing the time between solutions is ideal behavior for an anytime search algorithm and show that when actions have differing costs, many state-of-the-art search algorithms, including the search strategy of LAMA11 and anytime nonparametric A*, do not minimize the time between solutions. An empirical evaluation on seven domains shows that AEES often has boththe shortest time between incumbent solutions and the best solution in hand for a wide variety of cutoffs. Jordan Tyler Thayer, J. Benton 0001, Malte Helmert |
SOCS | 2 |
| 2010 | Integrating a Closed World Planner with an Open World Robot: A Case StudyabstractIn this paper, we present an integrated planning and robotic architecture that actively directs an agent engaged in an urban search and rescue (USAR) scenario. We describe three salient features that comprise the planning component of this system, namely (1) the ability to plan in a world open with respect to objects, (2) execution monitoring and replanning abilities, and (3) handling soft goals, and detail the interaction of these parts in representing and solving the USAR scenario at hand. We show that though insufficient in an individual capacity, the integration of this trio of features is sufficient to solve the scenario that we present. We test our system with an example problem that involves soft and hard goals, as well as goal deadlines and action costs, and show that the planner is capable of incorporating sensing actions and execution monitoring in order to produce goal-fulfilling plans that maximize the net benefit accrued. Kartik Talamadupula, J. Benton 0001, Paul W. Schermerhorn, Subbarao Kambhampati, Matthias Scheutz |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2010 | Cost Based Search Considered HarmfulabstractPlanning research has returned to the issue of optimizing costs (rather than sizes) of plans. A prevalent perception, at least among non-experts in search, is that graph search for optimizing the size of paths generalizes more or less trivially to optimizing the cost of paths. While this kind of generalization is usually straightforward for graph theorems, graph algorithms are a different story. In particular, implementing a search evaluation function by substituting cost for size is a Bad Idea. Though experts have stated as much, cutting-edge practitioners are still learning of the consequences the hard way; here we mount a forceful indictment on the inherent dangers of cost-based search. William Cushing, J. Benton 0001, Subbarao Kambhampati |
SOCS | 2 |
| 2010 | Planning for human-robot teaming in open worldsabstractAs the number of applications for human-robot teaming continue to rise, there is an increasing need for planning technologies that can guide robots in such teaming scenarios. In this article, we focus on adapting planning technology to Urban Search And Rescue (USAR) with a human-robot team. We start by showing that several aspects of state-of-the-art planning technology, including temporal planning, partial satisfaction planning, and replanning, can be gainfully adapted to this scenario. We then note that human-robot teaming also throws up an additional critical challenge, namely, enabling existing planners, which work under closed-world assumptions, to cope with the open worlds that are characteristic of teaming problems such as USAR. In response, we discuss the notion of conditional goals, and describe how we represent and handle a specific class of them called open world quantified goals. Finally, we describe how the planner, and its open world extensions, are integrated into a robot control architecture, and provide an empirical evaluation over USAR experimental runs to establish the effectiveness of the planning components. Kartik Talamadupula, J. Benton 0001, Subbarao Kambhampati, Paul W. Schermerhorn, Matthias Scheutz |
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. | 2 |
| 2009 | Finding and exploiting goal opportunities in real-time during plan executionabstractAutonomous robots that operate in real-world domains face multiple challenges that make planning and goal selection difficult. Not only must planning and execution occur in real time, newly acquired knowledge can invalidate previous plans, and goals and their utilities can change during plan execution. However, these events can also provide opportunities, if the architecture is designed to react appropriately. We present here an architecture that integrates the SapaReplan planner with the DIARC robot architecture, allowing the architecture to react dynamically to changes in the robot's goal structures. Paul W. Schermerhorn, J. Benton 0001, Matthias Scheutz, Kartik Talamadupula, Subbarao Kambhampati |
IROS | 2 |
| 2009 | Anytime heuristic search for partial satisfaction planning
J. Benton 0001, Minh Binh Do, Subbarao Kambhampati |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2007 | An LP-Based Heuristic for Optimal Planning
Menkes van den Briel, J. Benton 0001, Subbarao Kambhampati, Thomas W. M. Vossen |
CP | 2 |
| 2007 | Planning with Goal Utility Dependencies
Minh Binh Do, J. Benton 0001, Menkes van den Briel, Subbarao Kambhampati |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2005 | Over-Subscription Planning with Numeric Goals
J. Benton 0001, Minh Binh Do, Subbarao Kambhampati |
IJCAI | 1 |