Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arthur J. Riel

dblp:64/2980 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software maintenance and evolution · 50% Programming languages and type systems · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computing education
curriculum design
0.011989
Contributions to Teaching Object Oriented Design and Programming · OOPSLA 1989
Computing education › programming education
object-oriented programming instruction
0.011989
Contributions to Teaching Object Oriented Design and Programming · OOPSLA 1989
Computing education
programming education
0.011989
Contributions to Teaching Object Oriented Design and Programming · OOPSLA 1989
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
encapsulation
0.011988
Object-Oriented Programming: An Objective Sense of Style · OOPSLA 1988

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graded objectives · 0.0structural induction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Contributions to Teaching Object Oriented Design and Programming
abstract
We provide a formal agenda for teaching the object-oriented paradigm in a programming language independent manner, and a tool which supports our teaching approach. Our proposal for a comprehensive study of the subject includes an ordered set of objectives designed to guide the uninitiated user from zero knowledge about object-oriented programming through class definitions, inheritance, subtyping, and the parameterization of classes. This set of graded objectives provides both a useful metric for gauging a student's progress, and a facility through which users can begin their studies at a level commensurate with their experience.
Karl J. Lieberherr, Arthur J. Riel
OOPSLA2
1988 Demeter: A Case Study of Software Growth through Parameterized Classes
Karl J. Lieberherr, Arthur J. Riel
ICSE2
1988 Object-Oriented Programming: An Objective Sense of Style
abstract
We introduce a simple, programming language independent rule (known in-house as the Law of Demeter™) which encodes the ideas of encapsulation and modularity in an easy to follow form for the object-oriented programmer. You tend to get the following related benefits when you follow the Law of Demeter while minimizing simultaneously code duplication, the number of method arguments and the number of methods per class: Easier software maintenance, less coupling between your methods, better information hiding, narrower interfaces, methods which are easier to reuse, and easier correctness proofs using structural induction. We discuss two important interpretations of the Law (strong and weak) and we prove that any object-oriented program can be transformed to satisfy the Law. We express the Law in several languages which support object-oriented programming, including Flavors, Smalltalk-80, CLOS, C++ and Eiffel.
Karl J. Lieberherr, Ian M. Holland, Arthur J. Riel
OOPSLA3