Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bhavana Kanukurthi

dblp:64/6728 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-7519-4477ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 10 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Theory of computation · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
12 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 62% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 34% Privacy and data protection · 3%
Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 80% Information theory · 17% Coding theory · 3%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
secure auction
1.322024
Secure Vickrey Auctions with Rational Parties · CCS 2024
Secure Auctions in the Presence of Rational Adversaries · CCS 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security › security notions › non-malleability
non-malleable codes
1.132022
Rate one-third non-malleable codes · STOC 2022
Four-State Non-malleable Codes with Explicit Constant Rate · J. Cryptol. 2020
Non-malleable Randomness Encoders and Their Applications · EUROCRYPT (3) 2018
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design
0.922024
Secure Vickrey Auctions with Rational Parties · CCS 2024
Secure Auctions in the Presence of Rational Adversaries · CCS 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
randomness extraction
0.822021
Adaptive Extractors and Their Application to Leakage Resilient Secret Sharing · CRYPTO (3) 2021
Non-malleable Randomness Encoders and Their Applications · EUROCRYPT (3) 2018
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation
0.822024
Secure Auctions in the Presence of Rational Adversaries · CCS 2022
Secure Vickrey Auctions with Rational Parties · CCS 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
second-price auction
0.812024
Secure Vickrey Auctions with Rational Parties · CCS 2024
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secret sharing
leakage-resilient secret sharing
0.722022
Short Leakage Resilient and Non-malleable Secret Sharing Schemes · CRYPTO (1) 2022
Adaptive Extractors and Their Application to Leakage Resilient Secret Sharing · CRYPTO (3) 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secret sharing
0.722022
Short Leakage Resilient and Non-malleable Secret Sharing Schemes · CRYPTO (1) 2022
Adaptive Extractors and Their Application to Leakage Resilient Secret Sharing · CRYPTO (3) 2021
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secret sharing
non-malleable secret sharing
0.612022
Short Leakage Resilient and Non-malleable Secret Sharing Schemes · CRYPTO (1) 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
sealed-bid auction
0.612022
Secure Auctions in the Presence of Rational Adversaries · CCS 2022
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › provable security › security notions › non-malleability › non-malleable codes
split-state model
0.612022
Rate one-third non-malleable codes · STOC 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key exchange
0.542014
Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss · J. ACM 2014
Robust Fuzzy Extractors and Authenticated Key Agreement From Close Secrets · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss · STOC 2010
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy amplification
0.322014
Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss · J. ACM 2014
Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss · STOC 2010
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
authenticated key exchange
0.112012
Robust Fuzzy Extractors and Authenticated Key Agreement From Close Secrets · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
fuzzy extractor
0.112012
Robust Fuzzy Extractors and Authenticated Key Agreement From Close Secrets · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2012
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
coding theory
0.112020
Four-State Non-malleable Codes with Explicit Constant Rate · J. Cryptol. 2020
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
information-theoretic security
0.112014
Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss · J. ACM 2014
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.112014
Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss · J. ACM 2014
Information theory
information-theoretic security
0.012009
Key Agreement from Close Secrets over Unsecured Channels · EUROCRYPT 2009
Information theory › information-theoretic security
secret key agreement
0.012009
Key Agreement from Close Secrets over Unsecured Channels · EUROCRYPT 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

utility modeling · 1.5game theory · 1.5secure computation · 1.1combinatorial construction · 0.4information reconciliation · 0.4error-correcting codes · 0.4extractors · 0.2min-entropy analysis · 0.1bounded-storage model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Secure Vickrey Auctions with Rational Parties
abstract
In this work, we construct a second price (Vickrey) auction protocol (SPA), which does not require any auctioneers and ensures total privacy in the presence of rational parties participating in the auction. In particular, the confidentiality of the highest bid and the identity of the second highest bidder are protected. We model the bidders participating in the second price auction as rational, computationally bounded and privacy-sensitive parties. These are self-interested agents who care about winning the auction more than learning about the private bids of other parties. A rational party does not deviate from the protocol arbitrarily but does so only for its own individual 'advantage' -- without any consideration for others. Such an advantage is modelled using suitable utility functions.
Chaya Ganesh, Shreyas Gupta, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Girisha Shankar
CCS3
2022 Secure Auctions in the Presence of Rational Adversaries
abstract
Sealed bid auctions are used to allocate a resource among a set of interested parties. Traditionally, auctions need the presence of a trusted auctioneer to whom the bidders provide their private bid values. Existence of such a trusted party is not an assumption easily realized in practice. Generic secure computation protocols can be used to remove a trusted party. However, generic techniques result in inefficient protocols, and typically do not provide fairness -- that is, a corrupt party can learn the output and abort the protocol thereby preventing other parties from learning the output.
Chaya Ganesh, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Girisha Shankar
CCS2
2022 Short Leakage Resilient and Non-malleable Secret Sharing Schemes
Nishanth Chandran, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Sruthi Sekar
CRYPTO (1)2
2022 Rate one-third non-malleable codes
abstract
At ITCS 2010, Dziembowski, Pietrzak, and Wichs introduced Non-malleable Codes (NMCs) which protect against tampering of a codeword of a given message into the codeword of a related message. A well-studied model of tampering is the 2-split-state model where the codeword consists of two independently tamperable states. As with standard error-correcting codes, it is of great importance to build codes with high rates.
Divesh Aggarwal, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Maciej Obremski, Sruthi Sekar
STOC2
2021 Adaptive Extractors and Their Application to Leakage Resilient Secret Sharing
Nishanth Chandran, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Sruthi Sekar
CRYPTO (3)2
2020 Four-State Non-malleable Codes with Explicit Constant Rate
Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Sruthi Sekar
J. Cryptol.1
2018 Non-malleable Randomness Encoders and Their Applications
Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Sruthi Sekar
EUROCRYPT (3)1
2017 Four-State Non-malleable Codes with Explicit Constant Rate
Bhavana Kanukurthi, Sai Lakshmi Bhavana Obbattu, Sruthi Sekar
TCC (2)1
2014 Locally Updatable and Locally Decodable Codes
Nishanth Chandran, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Rafail Ostrovsky
TCC2
2014 Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss
abstract
We study the problem of “privacy amplification”: key agreement between two parties who both know a weak secret w , such as a password. (Such a setting is ubiquitous on the internet, where passwords are the most commonly used security device.) We assume that the key agreement protocol is taking place in the presence of an active computationally unbounded adversary Eve. The adversary may have partial knowledge about w , so we assume only that w has some entropy from Eve’s point of view. Thus, the goal of the protocol is to convert this nonuniform secret w into a uniformly distributed string R that is fully secret from Eve. R may then be used as a key for running symmetric cryptographic protocols (such as encryption, authentication, etc.). Because we make no computational assumptions, the entropy in R can come only from w . Thus, such a protocol must minimize the entropy loss during its execution, so that R is as long as possible. The best previous results have entropy loss of Θ( κ 2 ), where κ is the security parameter, thus requiring the password to be very long even for small values of κ . In this work, we present the first protocol for information-theoretic key agreement that has entropy loss linear in the security parameter. The result is optimal up to constant factors. We achieve our improvement through a somewhat surprising application of error-correcting codes for the edit distance. The protocol can be extended to provide also “information reconciliation,” that is, to work even when the two parties have slightly different versions of w (e.g., when biometrics are involved).
Nishanth Chandran, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Leonid Reyzin
J. ACM2
2012 Robust Fuzzy Extractors and Authenticated Key Agreement From Close Secrets
abstract
Consider two parties holding samples from correlated distributions$W$and$W^{\prime}$, respectively, where these samples are within distance$t$of each other in some metric space. The parties wish to agree on a close-to-uniformly distributed secret key$R$by sending a single message over an insecure channel controlled by an all-powerful adversary who may read and modify anything sent over the channel. We consider both the keyless case, where the parties share no additional secret information, and the keyed case, where the parties share a long-term secret${\ssr SK}_{\ssr Ext}$that they can use to generate a sequence of session keys$\{R_{j}\}$using multiple pairs$\{(W_{j}, W^{\prime}_{j})\}$. The former has applications to, e.g., biometric authentication, while the latter arises in, e.g., the bounded-storage model with errors. We show solutions that improve upon previous work in several respects.The best prior solution for the keyless case with no errors (i.e.,$t=0$) requires the min-entropy of$W$to exceed$2n/3$, where$n$is the bit length of$W$. Our solution applies whenever the min-entropy of$W$exceeds the minimal threshold$n/2$, and yields a longer key.
Yevgeniy Dodis, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Jonathan Katz, Leonid Reyzin, Adam D. Smith 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2011 Cryptography with Tamperable and Leaky Memory
Yael Tauman Kalai, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Amit Sahai
CRYPTO2
2010 Privacy amplification with asymptotically optimal entropy loss
abstract
We study the problem of "privacy amplification": key agreement between two parties who both know a weak secret w, such as a password. (Such a setting is ubiquitous on the internet, where passwords are the most commonly used security device.) We assume that the key agreement protocol is taking place in the presence of an active computationally unbounded adversary Eve. The adversary may have partial knowledge about w, so we assume only that w has some entropy from Eve's point of view. Thus, the goal of the protocol is to convert this non-uniform secret w into a uniformly distributed string R that is fully secret from Eve. R may then be used as a key for running symmetric cryptographic protocols (such as encryption, authentication, etc.).
Nishanth Chandran, Bhavana Kanukurthi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Leonid Reyzin
STOC2
2009 Key Agreement from Close Secrets over Unsecured Channels
Bhavana Kanukurthi, Leonid Reyzin
EUROCRYPT1