Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuangtao Li
dblp:65/10047
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 44% Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Layer-Wise Representation Fusion for Compositional Generalization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Layer-Wise Representation Fusion for Compositional Generalization · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
syntactic and semantic representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Layer-Wise Representation Fusion for Compositional Generalization · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
residual connection analysis · 0.8fuse-attention module · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Layer-Wise Representation Fusion for Compositional GeneralizationabstractExisting neural models are demonstrated to struggle with compositional generalization (CG), i.e., the ability to systematically generalize to unseen compositions of seen components. A key reason for failure on CG is that the syntactic and semantic representations of sequences in both the uppermost layer of the encoder and decoder are entangled. However, previous work concentrates on separating the learning of syntax and semantics instead of exploring the reasons behind the representation entanglement (RE) problem to solve it. We explain why it exists by analyzing the representation evolving mechanism from the bottom to the top of the Transformer layers. We find that the ``shallow'' residual connections within each layer fail to fuse previous layers' information effectively, leading to information forgetting between layers and further the RE problems. Inspired by this, we propose LRF, a novel Layer-wise Representation Fusion framework for CG, which learns to fuse previous layers' information back into the encoding and decoding process effectively through introducing a fuse-attention module at each encoder and decoder layer. LRF achieves promising results on two realistic benchmarks, empirically demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposal. Codes are available at https://github.com/thinkaboutzero/LRF. Yafang Zheng, Shuangtao Li, Zhaohong Lai, Biao Fu, Yidong Chen 0001, Xiaodong Shi |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2023 | LEAPT: Learning Adaptive Prefix-to-Prefix Translation For Simultaneous Machine TranslationabstractSimultaneous machine translation, which aims at a realtime translation, is useful in many live scenarios but very challenging due to the trade-off between accuracy and latency. To achieve the balance for both, the model needs to wait for appropriate streaming text (READ policy) and then generates its translation (WRITE policy). However, WRITE policies of previous work either are specific to the method itself due to the end-to-end training or suffer from the input mismatch between training and decoding for the non-end-to-end training. Therefore, it is essential to learn a generic and better WRITE policy for simultaneous machine translation. Inspired by strategies utilized by human interpreters and "wait" policies, we propose a novel adaptive prefix-to-prefix training policy called LEAPT, which allows our machine translation model to learn how to translate source sentence prefixes and make use of the future context. Experiments show that our proposed methods greatly outperform competitive baselines and achieve promising results. Shuangtao Li, Xiaodong Shi |
ICASSP | 2 |