Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Susan H. Gray

dblp:65/1255 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
0000-0002-6638-2537ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% User interface design and tools · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › information seeking
information search		 0.011991
Information Search with Dynamic Text vs Paper Text: An Empirical Comparison · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1991
User interface design and tools › information presentation
text presentation		 0.011991
Information Search with Dynamic Text vs Paper Text: An Empirical Comparison · Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical comparison · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Information Search with Dynamic Text vs Paper Text: An Empirical Comparison
Susan H. Gray, C. Bradford Barber, Dennis E. Shasha
 Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.1
1990 Using protocol analyses and drawings to study mental model construction during hypertext navigation
abstract
This study used protocol analyses and user drawings of their models of the system to investigate the “getting lost” problem in hypertext navigation. The “getting lost” problem is viewed as occurring when routine expectations of naive users, concerning appropriate linear sequences, are violated. Several ways in which users persistently attempt to work within a linear model, despite its inapplicability, are examined. The transition to more hierarchical user models is described.
Susan H. Gray
 Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.1