Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. Richard Swenson

dblp:65/4959 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Database theory · 48% Database system architecture and tuning · 28% Data models and query languages · 24%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database theory › dependency theory
functional dependency
0.021975
On the Semantics of the Relational Data Model · SIGMOD Conference 1975
A Unified Approach to Functional Dependencies and Relations · SIGMOD Conference 1975
Database theory
dependency theory
0.011975
A Unified Approach to Functional Dependencies and Relations · SIGMOD Conference 1975
Database system architecture and tuning › database design
normal form decomposition
0.011975
A Unified Approach to Functional Dependencies and Relations · SIGMOD Conference 1975
Database theory
normalization
0.011975
On the Semantics of the Relational Data Model · SIGMOD Conference 1975
Data models and query languages
relational model
0.011975
On the Semantics of the Relational Data Model · SIGMOD Conference 1975
Database system architecture and tuning › database design
schema normalization
0.011975
A Unified Approach to Functional Dependencies and Relations · SIGMOD Conference 1975
Data models and query languages › conceptual modeling
semantic data model
0.011975
On the Semantics of the Relational Data Model · SIGMOD Conference 1975
Database system architecture and tuning
database design
0.011975
On the Semantics of the Relational Data Model · SIGMOD Conference 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

algorithmic mapping of functional dependencies to normal forms · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1975 A Unified Approach to Functional Dependencies and Relations
abstract
In Codd's relational model, the relation name groups together a family of functional dependencies over a set of attributes. For integrity and for maintenance purposes it is important to eliminate inherent redundancy within a relation due to the repetition of instances of a functional connection between attributes. This led Codd to propose a series of three normalizations. The manipulation of normal forms is governed by functional dependencies that are explicitly declared to exist within the relation. Since functional dependencies completely govern the decomposition rules of normalization, perhaps it is more sensible to take them as the elementary notions to be later synthesized into more complex structures, such as relations. Our goals, then are twofold. First, we will discuss how the use of functional dependencies lends itself to a rigorous and correct, yet clear and simple description of complex data relationships. Second, we will outline some new computational techniques to map functional dependencies into normal form relations algorithmically, thus allowing us to use the dependencies as a basic unit on the implementation as well as conceptual level.
Philip A. Bernstein, J. Richard Swenson, Dennis Tsichritzis
SIGMOD Conference2
1975 On the Semantics of the Relational Data Model
abstract
The relational model for data base organization introduced clearly defined basic algebraic concepts whose properties are well understood. As a consequence, questions of a semantic nature arise. Due to the mathematical nature of the relational model, these questions cannot be answered completely by it. Therefore, a data model is discussed that takes into account basic semantic properties that object types and relationships among them apparently have in the real world. The model permits a data base to be partitioned into independent object types which are natural insertion and deletion units, and associations among them. Independent object types are described by characteristics which are meaningful modification units.This data model permits us to analyze the ideas behind the relational theory more precisely, in particular the meaning of functional dependency and normalization. Insertion-deletion rules for relations in third normal form are developed, and proposals are made to avoid some drawbacks that exist even when relations in third normal form are used as the user interface to a data base.
Hans Albrecht Schmid, J. Richard Swenson
SIGMOD Conference2