Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jay Boisseau
dblp:65/5271
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 44% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 34% Performance modeling and evaluation · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems
grid computing |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Development of Web Toolkits for Computational Science Portals: The NPACI HotPage · HPDC 2000 |
Distributed systems › grid computing
science gateway |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Development of Web Toolkits for Computational Science Portals: The NPACI HotPage · HPDC 2000 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
memory latency tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Multi-processor Performance on the Tera MTA · SC 1998 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
multithreading |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Multi-processor Performance on the Tera MTA · SC 1998 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
parallel performance evaluation |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Multi-processor Performance on the Tera MTA · SC 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
web services · 0.0amdahl's law analysis · 0.0NAS benchmarks · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Development of Web Toolkits for Computational Science Portals: The NPACI HotPageabstractThe NPACI (National Partnership for Advanced Computational Infrastructure) HotPage is a user portal that provides views of a distributed set of high-performance computing (HPC) resources as either an integrated meta-system or as individual machines. These Web pages run on any Web browser, regardless of the system or geographical location, and are supported by secure, encrypted log-in sessions where authenticated users can access their HPC system accounts and perform basic computational tasks. We describe the development of the Grid Portals Toolkit (GridPort), which is based on the architecture developed for the HotPage, and provide computational scientists and application developers with a set of simple, modular services and tools that allow application-level, customized science portal development and that facilitate seamless Web-based access to distributed computational resources and Grid services. Mary P. Thomas, Stephen A. Mock, Jay Boisseau |
HPDC | 3 |
| 1998 | Multi-processor Performance on the Tera MTAabstractThe Tera MTA is a revolutionary commercial computer based on a multithreaded processor architecture. In contrast to many other parallel architectures, the Tera MTA can effectively use high amounts of parallelism on a single processor. By running multiple threads on a single processor, it can tolerate memory latency and to keep the processor saturated. If the computation is sufficiently large, it can benefit from running on multiple processors. A primary architectural goal of the MTA is that it provide scalable performance over multiple processors. This paper is a preliminary investigation of the first multi-processor Tera MTA. In a previous paper [1] we reported that on the kernel NAS 2 benchmarks [2], a single-processor MTA system running at the architected clock speed would be similar in performance to a single processor of the Cray T90. We found that the compilers of both machines were able to find the necessary threads or vector operations, after making standard changes to the random number generator. In this paper we update the single-processor results in two ways: we use only actual clock speeds, and we report improvements given by further tuning of the MTA codes. We then investigate the performance of the best single-processor codes when run on a two-processor MTA, making no further tuning effort. The parallel efficiency of the codes range from 77% to 99%. An analysis shows that the "serial bottlenecks" -- unparallelized code sections and the cost of allocating and freeing the parallel hardware resources -- account for less than a percent of the runtimes. Thus, Amdahl's Law needn't take effect on the NAS benchmarks until there are hundreds of processors running thousands of threads. Instead, the major source of inefficiency appears to be an imperfect network connecting the processors to the memory. Ideally, the network can support one memory reference per instruction. The current hardware has defects that reduce the throughput to about 85% of this rate. Except for the EP benchmark, the tuned codes issue memory references at nearly the peak rate of one per instruction. Consequently, the network can support the memory references issued by one, but not two, processors. As a result, the parallel efficiency of EP is near- perfect, but the others are reduced accordingly. Another reason for imperfect speedup pertains to the compiler. While the definition of a thread in a single processor or multi-processor mode is essentially the same, there is a different implementation and an associated overhead with running on multiple processors. We characterize the overhead of running "frays" (a collection of threads running on a single processor) and "crews" (a collection of frays, one per processor.) Allan Snavely, Larry Carter, Jay Boisseau, Amitava Majumdar 0001, Kang Su Gatlin, Nick Mitchell, John Feo, Brian D. Koblenz |
SC | 3 |