Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Clayton Kunz

dblp:66/1162 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 100%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 31% 3D vision · 25% Reinforcement learning · 24%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Human-AI interaction · 23%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
camera calibration
0.112012
Flat Refractive Geometry · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Computational photography and imaging
camera geometry
0.112012
Flat Refractive Geometry · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration
0.112006
The human-robot interaction operating system · HRI 2006
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
autonomous exploration
0.012003
Instrument deployment for Mars Rovers · ICRA 2003
Human-AI interaction › conversational interaction
task-oriented dialogue
0.012006
The human-robot interaction operating system · HRI 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree
0.011997
Option Decision Trees with Majority Votes · ICML 1997
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.011997
Option Decision Trees with Majority Votes · ICML 1997
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › environment mapping
indoor mapping
0.011997
Automatic mapping of dynamic office environments · ICRA 1997
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
majority voting
0.011997
Option Decision Trees with Majority Votes · ICML 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › manipulator control
robot arm control
0.012003
Instrument deployment for Mars Rovers · ICRA 2003
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
abductive reasoning
0.011997
Automatic mapping of dynamic office environments · ICRA 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

physics-based modeling · 0.3calibration · 0.3software framework · 0.1API · 0.1conditional executive · 0.03d site model · 0.0option trees · 0.0majority vote · 0.0inductive mapping · 0.0abductive mapping · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Flat Refractive Geometry
abstract
While the study of geometry has mainly concentrated on single viewpoint (SVP) cameras, there is growing attention to more general non-SVP systems. Here, we study an important class of systems that inherently have a non-SVP: a perspective camera imaging through an interface into a medium. Such systems are ubiquitous: They are common when looking into water-based environments. The paper analyzes the common flat-interface class of systems. It characterizes the locus of the viewpoints (caustic) of this class and proves that the SVP model is invalid in it. This may explain geometrical errors encountered in prior studies. Our physics-based model is parameterized by the distance of the lens from the medium interface, besides the focal length. The physical parameters are calibrated by a simple approach that can be based on a single frame. This directly determines the system geometry. The calibration is then used to compensate for modeled system distortion. Based on this model, geometrical measurements of objects are significantly more accurate than if based on an SVP model. This is demonstrated in real-world experiments. In addition, we examine by simulation the errors expected by using the SVP model. We show that when working at a constant range, the SVP model can be a good approximation.
Tali Treibitz, Yoav Y. Schechner, Clayton Kunz, Hanumant Singh
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3
2008 Deep sea underwater robotic exploration in the ice-covered Arctic ocean with AUVs
abstract
Abstract — The Arctic seafloor remains one of the last unexplored areas on Earth. Exploration of this unique environment using standard remotely operated oceanographic tools has been obstructed by the dense Arctic ice cover. In the summer of 2007 the Arctic Gakkel Vents Expedition (AGAVE) was conducted with the express intention of understanding aspects of the marine biology, chemistry and geology associated with hydrothermal venting on the section of the mid-ocean ridge known as the Gakkel Ridge. Unlike previous research expeditions to the Arctic the focus was on high resolution imaging and sampling of the deep seafloor. To accomplish our goals we designed two new Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) named Jaguar and Puma, which performed a total of nine dives at depths of up to 4062m. These AUVs were used in combination with a towed vehicle and a conventional CTD (conductivity, temperature and depth) program to characterize the seafloor. This paper describes the design decisions and operational changes required to ensure useful service, and facilitate deployment, operation, and recovery in the unique Arctic environment. I.
Clayton Kunz, Chris Murphy, Richard Camilli, Hanumant Singh, John Bailey, Ryan M. Eustice, Michael V. Jakuba, Ko-ichi Nakamura, Christopher N. Roman, Taichi Sato, Robert A. Sohn, Claire Willis
IROS1
2006 The human-robot interaction operating system
abstract
In order for humans and robots to work effectively together, they need to be able to converse about abilities, goals and achievements. Thus, we are developing an interaction infrastructure called the "Human-Robot Interaction Operating System" (HRI/OS). The HRI/OS provides a structured software framework for building human-robot teams, supports a variety of user interfaces, enables humans and robots to engage in task-oriented dialogue, and facilitates integration of robots through an extensible API.
Terrence Fong, Clayton Kunz, Laura M. Hiatt, Magdalena D. Bugajska
HRI2
2006 A Preliminary Study of Peer-to-Peer Human-Robot Interaction
abstract
The Peer-To-Peer Human-Robot Interaction (P2P-HRI) project is developing techniques to improve task coordination and collaboration between human and robot partners. Our work is motivated by the need to develop effective human-robot teams for space mission operations. A central element of our approach is creating dialogue and interaction tools that enable humans and robots to flexibly support one another. In order to understand how this approach can influence task performance, we recently conducted a series of tests simulating a lunar construction task with a human-robot team. In this paper, we describe the tests performed, discuss our initial results, and analyze the effect of intervention on task performance.
Terrence Fong, Jean Scholtz, Julie A. Shah, Lorenzo Flueckiger, Clayton Kunz, David Lees, John Schreiner, Michael D. Siegel, Laura M. Hiatt, Illah R. Nourbakhsh, Reid G. Simmons, Robert O. Ambrose, Robert R. Burridge, Brian Antonishek, Magdalena D. Bugajska, Alan C. Schultz, J. Gregory Trafton
SMC5
2005 Photo-realistic Terrain Modeling and Visualization for Mars Exploration Rover Science Operations
abstract
Modern NASA planetary exploration missions employ complex systems of hardware and software managed by large teams of engineers and scientists in order to study remote environments. The most complex and successful of these recent projects is the Mars Exploration Rover mission. The Computational Sciences Division at NASA Ames Research Center delivered a 3D visualization program, Viz, to the MER mission that provides an immersive, interactive environment for science analysis of the remote planetary surface. In addition, Ames provided the Athena Science Team with high-quality terrain reconstructions generated with the Ames Stereo-pipeline. The on-site support team for these software systems responded to unanticipated opportunities to generate 3D terrain models during the primary MER mission. This paper describes Viz, the Stereo-pipeline, and the experiences of the on-site team supporting the scientists at JPL during the primary MER mission.
Laurence J. Edwards, Michael Sims, Clayton Kunz, David Lees, Judd Bowman
SMC3
2003 Instrument deployment for Mars Rovers
abstract
Future Mars rovers, such as the planned 2009 MSL rover, require sufficient autonomy to robustly approach rock targets and place an instrument in contact with them. It took the 1997 Sojourner Mars rover between 3 and 5 communications cycles to accomplish this. This paper describes the NASA Ames approach to robustly accomplishing single cycle instrument deployment, using the K9 prototype Mars rover. An off-board 3D site model is used to select science targets for the rover. K9 navigates to targets using deduced reckoning, and autonomously assesses the target area to determine where to place an arm mounted microscopic camera. Onboard K9 is a resource cognizant conditional executive, which extends the complexity and duration of operations that a can be accomplished without intervention from mission control.
Liam Pedersen, Maria Bualat, Clayton Kunz, Susan Y. Lee, Randy Sargent, Richard Washington, Anne Wright
ICRA3
2003 Terrain model registration for single cycle instrument placement
abstract
This paper presents an efficient and robust method for registration of terrain models created using stereovision on a planetary rover. Our approach projects two surface models into a virtual depth map, rendering the models, as they would be seen from a single range sensor. Correspondence is established based on which points project to the same location in the virtual range sensor. A robust norm of the deviations in observed depth is used as the objective function, and the algorithm searches for the rigid transformation, which minimizes the norm. An initial coarse search is done using rover pose information from odometry and orientation sensing. A fine search is done using Levenberg-Marquardt. Our method enables a planetary rover to keep track of designated science targets as it moves, and to hand off targets from one set of stereo cameras to another. These capabilities are essential for the rover to autonomously approach a science target and place an instrument in contact in a single command cycle.
Matthew C. Deans, Clayton Kunz, Randy Sargent, Liam Pedersen
IROS2
2003 The mobot museum robot installations: a five year experiment
abstract
This paper summarizes a long-term project to install and maintain socially interactive, autonomous mobile robots in public spaces. We have deployed four robots over the past five years, accumulating a total operational time exceeding seven years. This document introduces the robots, then focuses on lessons learned from each deployment. Finally, this paper describes how this entire project came to a close, offering a cautionary tale for those who wish to embark on such an effort in the future.
Illah R. Nourbakhsh, Clayton Kunz, Thomas Willeke
IROS2
1998 Pruning Decision Trees with Misclassification Costs
Jeffrey P. Bradford, Clayton Kunz, Ron Kohavi, Clifford Brunk, Carla E. Brodley
ECML2
1997 Option Decision Trees with Majority Votes
Ron Kohavi, Clayton Kunz
ICML2
1997 Automatic mapping of dynamic office environments
abstract
We present a robot, called InductoBeast, that greets a new office building by learning the floorplan automatically, with minimal human intervention and a priori knowledge. Our robot architecture is unique because it combines both abductive and inductive mapping methods to solve this problem. We present experimental results spanning three office environments. We hope the breadth of these results helps to establish a performance benchmark against which robust and adaptive navigator robots of the future may be measured.
Clayton Kunz, Thomas Willeke, Illah R. Nourbakhsh
ICRA1