Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gregory Druck

dblp:66/4867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 40% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% Learning paradigms · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Web and social media mining · 64% Data mining · 36%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.122009
Semi-supervised classification with hybrid generative/discriminative methods · KDD 2007
Semi-supervised Learning of Dependency Parsers using Generalized Expectation Criteria · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.112009
Active Learning by Labeling Features · EMNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.112009
Semi-supervised Learning of Dependency Parsers using Generalized Expectation Criteria · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112009
Semi-supervised Learning of Dependency Parsers using Generalized Expectation Criteria · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › generative and discriminative models
generative-discriminative hybrid classification
0.112007
Semi-supervised classification with hybrid generative/discriminative methods · KDD 2007
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model
0.112007
Semi-supervised classification with hybrid generative/discriminative methods · KDD 2007
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.112006
Multi-Conditional Learning: Generative/Discriminative Training for Clustering and Classification · AAAI 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering
0.112006
Multi-Conditional Learning: Generative/Discriminative Training for Clustering and Classification · AAAI 2006
Web and social media mining › social media analysis
user-generated content mining
0.012012
Spice it up? Mining Refinements to Online Instructions from User Generated Content · ACL (1) 2012
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.012008
Learning from labeled features using generalized expectation criteria · SIGIR 2008
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.012007
Semi-supervised classification with hybrid generative/discriminative methods · KDD 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text mining · 0.3generalized expectation criteria · 0.2semi-supervised learning · 0.1feature labeling · 0.1multinomial logistic regression · 0.1maximum likelihood · 0.1markov random field · 0.1generative training · 0.1discriminative training · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Spice it up? Mining Refinements to Online Instructions from User Generated Content
Gregory Druck
ACL (1)1
2011 Toward interactive training and evaluation
abstract
Machine learning often relies on costly labeled data, and this impedes its application to new classification and information extraction problems. This has motivated the development of methods for leveraging abundant prior knowledge about these problems, including methods for lightly supervised learning using model expectation constraints. Building on this work, we envision an interactive training paradigm in which practitioners perform evaluation, analyze errors, and provide and refine expectation constraints in a closed loop. In this paper, we focus on several key subproblems in this paradigm that can be cast as selecting a representative sample of the unlabeled data for the practitioner to inspect. To address these problems, we propose stratified sampling methods that use model expectations as a proxy for latent output variables. In classification and sequence labeling experiments, these sampling strategies reduce accuracy evaluation effort by as much as 53%, provide more reliable estimates of $F_1$ for rare labels, and aid in the specification and refinement of constraints.
Gregory Druck, Andrew McCallum
CIKM1
2010 High-Performance Semi-Supervised Learning using Discriminatively Constrained Generative Models
Gregory Druck, Andrew McCallum
ICML1
2009 Semi-supervised Learning of Dependency Parsers using Generalized Expectation Criteria
Gregory Druck, Gideon S. Mann, Andrew McCallum
ACL/IJCNLP1
2009 Active Learning by Labeling Features
Gregory Druck, Burr Settles, Andrew McCallum
EMNLP1
2009 Alternating Projections for Learning with Expectation Constraints
Kedar Bellare, Gregory Druck, Andrew McCallum
UAI2
2008 Learning from labeled features using generalized expectation criteria
abstract
It is difficult to apply machine learning to new domains because often we lack labeled problem instances. In this paper, we provide a solution to this problem that leverages domain knowledge in the form of affinities between input features and classes. For example, in a baseball vs. hockey text classification problem, even without any labeled data, we know that the presence of the word puck is a strong indicator of hockey. We refer to this type of domain knowledge as a labeled feature. In this paper, we propose a method for training discriminative probabilistic models with labeled features and unlabeled instances. Unlike previous approaches that use labeled features to create labeled pseudo-instances, we use labeled features directly to constrain the model's predictions on unlabeled instances. We express these soft constraints using generalized expectation (GE) criteria --- terms in a parameter estimation objective function that express preferences on values of a model expectation. In this paper we train multinomial logistic regression models using GE criteria, but the method we develop is applicable to other discriminative probabilistic models. The complete objective function also includes a Gaussian prior on parameters, which encourages generalization by spreading parameter weight to unlabeled features. Experimental results on text classification data sets show that this method outperforms heuristic approaches to training classifiers with labeled features. Experiments with human annotators show that it is more beneficial to spend limited annotation time labeling features rather than labeling instances. For example, after only one minute of labeling features, we can achieve 80% accuracy on the ibm vs. mac text classification problem using GE-FL, whereas ten minutes labeling documents results in an accuracy of only 77%
Gregory Druck, Gideon S. Mann, Andrew McCallum
SIGIR1
2007 Semi-supervised classification with hybrid generative/discriminative methods
abstract
We compare two recently proposed frameworks for combining generative and discriminative probabilistic classifiers and apply them to semi-supervised classification. In both cases we explore the tradeoff between maximizing a discriminative likelihood of labeled data and a generative likelihood of labeled and unlabeled data. While prominent semi-supervised learning methods assume low density regions between classes or are subject to generative modeling assumptions, we conjecture that hybrid generative/discriminative methods allow semi-supervised learning in the presence of strongly overlapping classes and reduce the risk of modeling structure in the unlabeled data that is irrelevant for the specific classification task of interest. We apply both hybrid approaches within naively structured Markov random field models and provide a thorough empirical comparison with two well-known semi-supervised learning methods on six text classification tasks. A semi-supervised hybrid generative/discriminative method provides the best accuracy in 75% of the experiments, and the multi-conditional learning hybrid approach achieves the highest overall mean accuracy across all tasks.
Gregory Druck, Christopher Joseph Pal, Andrew McCallum, Xiaojin Zhu 0001
KDD1
2006 Multi-Conditional Learning: Generative/Discriminative Training for Clustering and Classification
Andrew McCallum, Christopher Joseph Pal, Gregory Druck
AAAI3