Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hirotaka Soma
dblp:66/5017
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 67% Data mining · 33% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › text analysis
term co-occurrence |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Featuring web communities based on word co-occurrence structure of communications: 736 · WWW 2002 |
Information retrieval
text analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Featuring web communities based on word co-occurrence structure of communications: 736 · WWW 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
keygraph · 0.0co-occurrence analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Featuring web communities based on word co-occurrence structure of communications: 736abstractTextual communication in message boards is analyzed for classifying Web communities. We present a communication-content based generalization of an existing business-oriented classification of Web communities, using KeyGraph, a method for visualizing the co-occurrence relations between words and word clusters in text. Here, the text in a message board is analyzed with KeyGraph, and the structure obtained is shown to reflect the essence of the content-flow. The relation of this content-flow with participants' interests is then formalized. Three structure-features of relations between participants and words, determining the type of the community, are shown to be computed and visualized: (1) centralization (2) context coherence and (3) creative decisions. This helps in surveying the essence of a community, e.g. whether the community creates useful knowledge, how easy it is to join the community, and whether/why the community is good for making commercial advertisement. Yukio Ohsawa, Hirotaka Soma, Yutaka Matsuo, Naohiro Matsumura, Masaki Usui |
WWW | 2 |