Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael J. Pratt

dblp:66/6593 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
10as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 14 · 10 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 73% Computational fabrication · 27%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › computer-aided design › feature-based modeling
feature-based CAD model
0.112005
Towards the standardized exchange of parameterized feature-based CAD models · Comput. Aided Des. 2005
Computational fabrication
additive manufacturing
0.012002
Progress towards an international standard for data transfer in rapid prototyping and layered manufacturing · Comput. Aided Des. 2002
Geometric modeling and processing
shape modeling
0.012001
A shape modelling applications programming interface for the STEP standard · Comput. Aided Des. 2001
Geometric modeling and processing
feature recognition
0.011993
Automated feature recognition from 2D drawings · Comput. Aided Des. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

feature-based modeling · 0.1data exchange standards · 0.0shape modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A method to exchange procedurally represented 2D CAD model data using ISO 10303 STEP
Byungchul Kim, Duhwan Mun, Soonhung Han, Michael J. Pratt
Comput. Aided Des.4
2008 Standardized data exchange of CAD models with design intent
Junhwan Kim, Michael J. Pratt, Raj G. Iyer, Ram D. Sriram
Comput. Aided Des.2
2006 Experience in the exchange of procedural shape models using ISO 10303 (STEP)
abstract
The international standard ISO 10303 (STEP) is being extended to permit the exchange of procedurally defined shape models, with additional parameterization and constraint information, between CAD systems. The transfer of parameterized assembly models is an additional objective. Most of the essential new resources have already been published by ISO, and the remainder are well advanced in the standardization process. Because these are new capabilities, at present not quite complete, there are at present no commercial STEP translators making use of them. However, several proof-of-concept trials have been performed or are in progress, using development versions of the STEP documentation. This paper reports in some detail on one of those trials, and comments on the experience gained. The conclusion is that the standardized exchange of CAD models containing 'design intent' information has been successfully demonstrated, but that the development of translators for that purpose is not an easy task. One particular problem area is pinpointed, where further research is needed to find ways of improving the efficiency of such exchanges.
Michael J. Pratt, Junhwan Kim
Symposium on Solid and Physical Modeling1
2005 Towards the standardized exchange of parameterized feature-based CAD models
Michael J. Pratt, Bill D. Anderson, Tony Ranger
Comput. Aided Des.1
2004 Extension of ISO 10303, the STEP Standard, for the Exchange of Procedural Shape Models
abstract
The paper describes the status of work aimed at extending the international standard ISO 10303 (STEP) to permit the exchange of procedurally defined shape models between CAD systems. Such models are specified by the sequence of operations used to construct them rather than by the explicit elements they contain. They have the advantage of being easy to edit in a receiving system, by contrast with the explicit models that can be exchanged using current standards, which prove to be inert after transfer. The use of the proposed methodology in the exchange of realistic procedural shape models of mechanical parts has already been demonstrated, and a brief account is given of some of the tests that have been performed.
Michael J. Pratt
SMI1
2002 Progress towards an international standard for data transfer in rapid prototyping and layered manufacturing
Michael J. Pratt, A. D. Bhatt, Debasish Dutta, Kevin W. Lyons, Lalit Patil, Ram D. Sriram
Comput. Aided Des.1
2001 A shape modelling applications programming interface for the STEP standard
Michael J. Pratt, Bill D. Anderson
Comput. Aided Des.1
1997 Quartic supercyclides I: Basic theory
Michael J. Pratt
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.1
1995 Cyclides in computer aided geometric design II
Michael J. Pratt
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.1
1993 Automated feature recognition from 2D drawings
Sheik Meeran, Michael J. Pratt
Comput. Aided Des.2
1993 On rational parametric curve approximation
Michael J. Pratt, Ray J. Goult, L. Ye
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.1
1990 Cyclides in computer aided geometric design
Michael J. Pratt
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.1
1985 Smooth parametric surface approximations to discrete data
Michael J. Pratt
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.1
1984 Design techniques for the definition of solid objects with free-form geometry
Tamás Várady, Michael J. Pratt
Comput. Aided Geom. Des.2