Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amit Agarwal 0008
dblp:67/340-8
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
0000-0002-1259-6839ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Approximation and online algorithms · 50% Mathematical optimization · 25% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Learning theory · 38% Reinforcement learning · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
online optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization · COLT 2006 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization · COLT 2006 |
Computational finance and economics › portfolio management › portfolio optimization
online portfolio selection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Algorithms for portfolio management based on the Newton method · ICML 2006 |
Computational finance and economics
portfolio management |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Algorithms for portfolio management based on the Newton method · ICML 2006 |
Approximation and online algorithms › online learning
logarithmic regret |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization · COLT 2006 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Algorithms for portfolio management based on the Newton method · ICML 2006 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization · COLT 2006 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Algorithms for portfolio management based on the Newton method · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization · COLT 2006 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization · COLT 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
potential function analysis · 0.1online convex optimization · 0.1newton method · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Logarithmic regret algorithms for online convex optimization
Elad Hazan, Amit Agarwal 0008, Satyen Kale |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2006 | Logarithmic Regret Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization
Elad Hazan, Adam Tauman Kalai, Satyen Kale, Amit Agarwal 0008 |
COLT | 4 |
| 2006 | Algorithms for portfolio management based on the Newton methodabstractWe experimentally study on-line investment algorithms first proposed by Agarwal and Hazan and extended by Hazan et al. which achieve almost the same wealth as the best constant-rebalanced portfolio determined in hindsight. These algorithms are the first to combine optimal logarithmic regret bounds with efficient deterministic computability. They are based on the Newton method for offline optimization which, unlike previous approaches, exploits second order information. After analyzing the algorithm using the potential function introduced by Agarwal and Hazan, we present extensive experiments on actual financial data. These experiments confirm the theoretical advantage of our algorithms, which yield higher returns and run considerably faster than previous algorithms with optimal regret. Additionally, we perform financial analysis using mean-variance calculations and the Sharpe ratio. Amit Agarwal 0008, Elad Hazan, Satyen Kale, Robert E. Schapire |
ICML | 1 |