Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Herjan van den Heuvel

dblp:67/56 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 71% Health and well-being technologies · 17% Design research and methods · 6%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
assistive robotics
0.212013
Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments · ICRA 2013
Human-robot interaction › social robot
companion robots
0.212013
Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments · ICRA 2013
Health and well-being technologies
mild cognitive impairment
0.212013
Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments · ICRA 2013
Human-robot interaction › assistive robotics
socially assistive robotics
0.212013
Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments · ICRA 2013
Usability and user experience research
technology acceptance
0.112014
A mixed-method approach to evoke creative and holistic thinking about robots in a home environment · HRI 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unified theory of acceptance and use of technology · 0.2technology acceptance model · 0.2mixed-method approach · 0.2user experience study · 0.2smart environment integration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 The EnrichMe Project - A Robotic Solution for Independence and Active Aging of Elderly People with MCI
Claudia Salatino, Valerio Gower, Meftah Ghrissi, Adriana Tapus, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Aleksandra Suwalska, Paolo Barattini, Roberto Rosso, Giulia Munaro, Nicola Bellotto, Herjan van den Heuvel
ICCHP (1)11
2014 A mixed-method approach to evoke creative and holistic thinking about robots in a home environment
abstract
Discovering older adults' perceptions and expectations of domestic care service robots are vital in informing the design and development of new technologies to ensure acceptability and usability. This paper identifies issues that were elicited from older adults using different methods to promote creative thinking about domestic robots at an emotional level, as well as pragmatic level. These included exploring people's ideal embodiment preferences and requirements for a domestic care service robot, and also what embodiments and functional aspects will not be acceptable. We analysed our findings using relevant constructs from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, and Technology Acceptance models. In addition to some already well-established findings, we discovered some surprising aspects concerning interaction, behaviour and appearance and the ability for the robot to fit the relevant context, both physically and conceptually.
Praminda Caleb-Solly, Sanja Dogramadzi, David Ellender, Tina Fear, Herjan van den Heuvel
HRI5
2013 Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments
abstract
This paper presents results of user evaluations with a socially assistive robot companion for older people suffering from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and living (alone) at home. Within the European FP7 project “CompanionAble” (2008-2012) [1], we developed assistive technologies combining a mobile robot and smart environment with the aim to support these people and assist them living in their familiar home environment. For a final evaluation, user experience studies were conducted with volunteer users who were invited to a test home where they lived and freely used the robot and integrated system over a period of two days. Services provided by the companion robot include reminders of appointments (pre-defined or added by the users themselves or their informal carer) as well as frequent recommendations to specific activities, which were listed e.g. by their family carers. Furthermore, video contact with relatives and friends, a cognitive stimulation game designed especially to counter the progress of cognitive impairments, and the possibility to store personal items with the robot are offered. Recognition of the user entering or leaving the home is triggering situation specific reminders like agenda items due during the (expected) absence, missed calls or items not to be forgotten. Continuing our previous work published in [2], this paper presents detailed description of the implemented assistive functions and results of user studies conducted during April and May 2012 in the smart house of the Dutch project partner Smart Homes in Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ch. Schroeter, Steffen Müller 0001, Michael Volkhardt, Erik Einhorn, Claire A. G. J. Huijnen, Herjan van den Heuvel, Andreas van Berlo, Andreas Bley, Horst-Michael Groß
ICRA6
2012 Further progress towards a home robot companion for people with mild cognitive impairment
abstract
This paper presents results of the development of a socially assistive home robot companion for older people suffering from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and living (alone) at home. This work was part of the European FP7 project “CompanionAble” (2008-2012) [1] which aimed at developing assistive technologies that can support these elderly and help them to remain in their familiar living environment for as long as possible. To overcome current market entry barriers, from the start we consistently adopted a user- and application-centered development process of the companion robot and focused on three main aspects: (i) the realization of a set of mandatory functionalities to support care recipients and caregivers, (ii) a strict design and usability driven realization to increase the acceptance of the robot by the different end-user groups (the elderly, their relatives, and caregivers), and (iii) the development and component selection considering production and operational costs. In continuation of the work presented in [2], this paper describes the final implementation of the companion robot and presents latest results of functional tests and early findings of user studies recently conducted in the smart house of the Dutch project partner Smart Homes in Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Horst-Michael Groß, Ch. Schroeter, Steffen Müller 0001, Michael Volkhardt, Erik Einhorn, Andreas Bley, Tim Langner, Matthias Merten, Claire A. G. J. Huijnen, Herjan van den Heuvel, Andreas van Berlo
SMC10