Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alon Zweig

dblp:67/993 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-3797-1591ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 19% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 19% Image recognition and object detection · 18%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology › concept hierarchy
label hierarchy
0.222012
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, When General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, when General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
novelty detection
0.222012
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, When General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, when General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.212013
Hierarchical Regularization Cascade for Joint Learning · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning
0.212013
Hierarchical Regularization Cascade for Joint Learning · ICML (3) 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
hierarchical classification
0.112012
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, When General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification
0.112007
Exploiting Object Hierarchy: Combining Models from Different Category Levels · ICCV 2007
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › error detection
out-of-vocabulary word detection
0.122012
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, When General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, when General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.012013
Hierarchical Regularization Cascade for Joint Learning · ICML (3) 2013
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition
0.012008
Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, when General and Specific Classifiers Disagree · NIPS 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online optimization · 0.2hierarchical regularization · 0.2hierarchical classifier disagreement · 0.1probabilistic classification · 0.1constellation model · 0.1classifier combination · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Group online adaptive learning
Alon Zweig, Gal Chechik
Mach. Learn.1
2013 Hierarchical Regularization Cascade for Joint Learning
abstract
As the sheer volume of available benchmark datasets increases, the problem of joint learning of classifiers and knowledge-transfer between classifiers, becomes more and more relevant. We present a hierarchical approach which exploits information sharing among different classification tasks, in multi-task and multi-class settings. It engages a top-down iterative method, which begins by posing an optimization problem with an incentive for large scale sharing among all classes. This incentive to share is gradually decreased,until there is no sharing and all tasks are considered separately. The method therefore exploits different levels of sharing within a given group of related tasks, without having to make hard decisions about the grouping of tasks. In order to deal with large scale problems, with many tasks and many classes, we extend our batch approach to an online setting and provide regret analysis of the algorithm. We tested our approach extensively on synthetic and real datasets, showing significant improvement over baseline and state-of-the-art methods.
Alon Zweig, Daphna Weinshall
ICML (3)1
2012 Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, When General and Specific Classifiers Disagree
abstract
Unexpected stimuli are a challenge to any machine learning algorithm. Here, we identify distinct types of unexpected events when general-level and specific-level classifiers give conflicting predictions. We define a formal framework for the representation and processing of incongruent events: Starting from the notion of label hierarchy, we show how partial order on labels can be deduced from such hierarchies. For each event, we compute its probability in different ways, based on adjacent levels in the label hierarchy. An incongruent event is an event where the probability computed based on some more specific level is much smaller than the probability computed based on some more general level, leading to conflicting predictions. Algorithms are derived to detect incongruent events from different types of hierarchies, different applications, and a variety of data types. We present promising results for the detection of novel visual and audio objects, and new patterns of motion in video. We also discuss the detection of Out-Of- Vocabulary words in speech recognition, and the detection of incongruent events in a multimodal audiovisual scenario.
Daphna Weinshall, Alon Zweig, Hynek Hermansky, Stefan Kombrink, Frank W. Ohl, Jörn Anemüller, Jörg-Hendrik Bach, Luc Van Gool, Fabian Nater, Tomás Pajdla, Michal Havlena, Misha Pavel
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2008 The DIRAC AWEAR audio-visual platform for detection of unexpected and incongruent events
abstract
It is of prime importance in everyday human life to cope with and respond appropriately to events that are not foreseen by prior experience. Machines to a large extent lack the ability to respond appropriately to such inputs. An important class of unexpected events is defined by incongruent combinations of inputs from different modalities and therefore multimodal information provides a crucial cue for the identification of such events, e.g., the sound of a voice is being heard while the person in the field-of-view does not move her lips. In the project DIRAC ("Detection and Identification of Rare Audio-visual Cues") we have been developing algorithmic approaches to the detection of such events, as well as an experimental hardware platform to test it. An audio-visual platform ("AWEAR" - audio-visual wearable device) has been constructed with the goal to help users with disabilities or a high cognitive load to deal with unexpected events. Key hardware components include stereo panoramic vision sensors and 6-channel worn-behind-the-ear (hearing aid) microphone arrays. Data have been recorded to study audio-visual tracking, a/v scene/object classification and a/v detection of incongruencies.
Jörn Anemüller, Jörg-Hendrik Bach, Barbara Caputo, Michal Havlena, Jie Luo 0018, Hendrik Kayser, Bastian Leibe, Petr Motlícek, Tomás Pajdla, Misha Pavel, Akihiko Torii, Luc Van Gool, Alon Zweig, Hynek Hermansky
ICMI13
2008 Object Category Detection Using Audio-Visual Cues
Jie Luo 0018, Barbara Caputo, Alon Zweig, Jörg-Hendrik Bach, Jörn Anemüller
ICVS3
2008 Beyond Novelty Detection: Incongruent Events, when General and Specific Classifiers Disagree
abstract
Unexpected stimuli are a challenge to any machine learning algorithm. Here we identify distinct types of unexpected events, focusing on 'incongruent events' - when 'general level' and 'specific level' classifiers give conflicting predictions. We define a formal framework for the representation and processing of incongruent events: starting from the notion of label hierarchy, we show how partial order on labels can be deduced from such hierarchies. For each event, we compute its probability in different ways, based on adjacent levels (according to the partial order) in the label hierarchy . An incongruent event is an event where the probability computed based on some more specific level (in accordance with the partial order) is much smaller than the probability computed based on some more general level, leading to conflicting predictions. We derive algorithms to detect incongruent events from different types of hierarchies, corresponding to class membership or part membership. Respectively, we show promising results with real data on two specific problems: Out Of Vocabulary words in speech recognition, and the identification of a new sub-class (e.g., the face of a new individual) in audio-visual facial object recognition.
Daphna Weinshall, Hynek Hermansky, Alon Zweig, Holly Brügge Jimison, Frank W. Ohl, Misha Pavel
NIPS3
2007 Exploiting Object Hierarchy: Combining Models from Different Category Levels
abstract
We investigated the computational properties of natural object hierarchy in the context of constellation object class models, and its utility for object class recognition. We first observed an interesting computational property of the object hierarchy: comparing the recognition rate when using models of objects at different levels, the higher more inclusive levels (e.g., closed-frame vehicles or vehicles) exhibit higher recall but lower precision when compared with the class specific level (e.g., bus). These inherent differences suggest that combining object classifiers from different hierarchical levels into a single classifier may improve classification, as it appears like these models capture different aspects of the object. We describe a method to combine these classifiers, and analyze the conditions under which improvement can be guaranteed. When given a small sample of a new object class, we describe a method to transfer knowledge across the tree hierarchy, between related objects. Finally, we describe extensive experiments using object hierarchies obtained from publicly available datasets, and show that the combined classifiers significantly improve recognition results.
Alon Zweig, Daphna Weinshall
ICCV1