Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maurizio Sacchi

dblp:68/173 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 87% Parallel and multicore computing · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed database
commit protocol
0.011990
A Distributed Commit Protocol for a Multicomputer System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1990
Distributed systems › distributed database
distributed transactions
0.011990
A Distributed Commit Protocol for a Multicomputer System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1990
Parallel and multicore computing
multicomputer
0.011990
A Distributed Commit Protocol for a Multicomputer System · IEEE Trans. Computers 1990

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed protocol design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1990 A Distributed Commit Protocol for a Multicomputer System
abstract
A distributed commit protocol suitable for multicomputer systems is described. A general programming environment which provides transactions as a programming tool is discussed. This environment is expected to be more dynamic than a database management system; in particular, it is not known how many and which processes will participate in a specific transaction. Therefore, a model of completely distributed transactions, without any hierarchical structure among the participant processes or any centralized locus of control, is proposed.>
Paolo Ancilotti, Beatrice Lazzerini, Cosimo Antonio Prete, Maurizio Sacchi
IEEE Trans. Computers4