Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiang Wu 0003
dblp:68/6423-3
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-2402-0957ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Vision and language · 26% Language models and text generation · 21% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI-generated content detection
AI-generated image detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
deepfake detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Utilize the Flow Before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Utilize the Flow Before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Middo: Model-Informed Dynamic Data Optimization for Enhanced LLM Fine-Tuning via Closed-Loop Learning · EMNLP 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety
over-refusal mitigation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Utilize the Flow Before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › remote sensing
remote sensing image analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VHM: Versatile and Honest Vision Language Model for Remote Sensing Image Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic data generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Strategic Coordination Framework of Small LMs Matches Large LMs in Data Synthesis · ACL (1) 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VHM: Versatile and Honest Vision Language Model for Remote Sensing Image Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VHM: Versatile and Honest Vision Language Model for Remote Sensing Image Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VHM: Versatile and Honest Vision Language Model for Remote Sensing Image Analysis · AAAI 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning of LLMs: From Chinese-Specifics to Reasoning-Memorization Correlations · ACL (1) 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
aerial image analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Detecting building changes with off-nadir aerial images · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
AI-generated content |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact Explanation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › collaborative learning
model collaboration |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A Strategic Coordination Framework of Small LMs Matches Large LMs in Data Synthesis · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning of LLMs: From Chinese-Specifics to Reasoning-Memorization Correlations · ACL (1) 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
remote sensing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Detecting building changes with off-nadir aerial images · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
strategic coordination · 0.9response certainty filtering · 0.9rehearsal training · 0.9model-informed data selection · 0.9large multimodal model · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9honest question answering · 0.9context-preserving refinement · 0.9closed-loop learning · 0.9benchmarking · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VHM: Versatile and Honest Vision Language Model for Remote Sensing Image AnalysisabstractThis paper develops a Versatile and Honest vision language Model (VHM) for remote sensing image analysis. VHM is built on a large-scale remote sensing image-text dataset with rich-content captions (VersaD), and an honest instruction dataset comprising both factual and deceptive questions (HnstD). Unlike prevailing remote sensing image-text datasets, in which image captions focus on a few prominent objects and their relationships, VersaD captions provide detailed information about image properties, object attributes, and the overall scene. This comprehensive captioning enables VHM to thoroughly understand remote sensing images and perform diverse remote sensing tasks. Moreover, different from existing remote sensing instruction datasets that only include factual questions, HnstD contains additional deceptive questions stemming from the non-existence of objects. This feature prevents VHM from producing affirmative answers to nonsense queries, thereby ensuring its honesty. In our experiments, VHM significantly outperforms various vision language models on common tasks of scene classification, visual question answering, and visual grounding. Additionally, VHM achieves competent performance on several unexplored tasks, such as building vectorizing, multi-label classification and honest question answering. Chao Pang 0001, Xingxing Weng, Jiang Wu 0003, Yi Liu 0028, Jiaxing Sun 0001, Litong Feng, Gui-Song Xia, Conghui He |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Utilize the Flow Before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction TuningabstractRefusal-Aware Instruction Tuning (RAIT) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to refuse to answer unknown questions. By modifying responses of unknown questions in the training data to refusal responses such as ''I don't know", RAIT enhances the reliability of LLMs and reduces their hallucination. Generally, RAIT modifies training samples based on the correctness of the initial LLM's response. However, this crude approach can cause LLMs to excessively refuse answering questions they could have correctly answered, the problem we call over-refusal. In this paper, we explore two primary causes of over-refusal: Static conflict occurs when similar samples within the LLM’s feature space receive differing supervision signals (original vs. modified ''I don't know"). Dynamic conflict arises as the LLM's evolving knowledge during SFT enables it to answer previously unanswerable questions, but the now-answerable training samples still retain the original ''I don't know" supervision signals from the initial LLM state, leading to inconsistencies. These conflicts cause the trained LLM to misclassify known questions as unknown, resulting in over-refusal. To address this issue, we introduce Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instructions Tuning (CRaFT). CRaFT centers on two main contributions: First, we additionally incorporate response certainty to selectively filter and modify data, reducing static conflicts. Second, we implement preliminary rehearsal training to characterize changes in the LLM's knowledge state, which helps mitigate dynamic conflicts during the fine-tuning process. We conducted extensive experiments on open-ended question answering and multiple-choice question task. Experiment results show that CRaFT can improve LLM's overall performance during the RAIT process. Runchuan Zhu, Jiang Wu 0003, Junyuan Gao, Jiaqi Wang 0003, Dahua Lin, Conghui He |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | A Strategic Coordination Framework of Small LMs Matches Large LMs in Data SynthesisabstractXin Gao, Qizhi Pei, Zinan Tang, Yu Li, Honglin Lin, Jiang Wu, Lijun Wu, Conghui He. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Xin Gao 0001, Qizhi Pei, Zinan Tang 0001, Yu Li 0006, Honglin Lin, Jiang Wu 0003, Lijun Wu 0003, Conghui He |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2025 | Middo: Model-Informed Dynamic Data Optimization for Enhanced LLM Fine-Tuning via Closed-Loop LearningabstractSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) Large Language Models (LLMs) fundamentally rely on highquality training data.While data selection and data synthesis are two common strategies to improve data quality, existing approaches often face limitations in static dataset curation that fail to adapt to evolving model capabilities.In this paper, we introduce Middo, a self-evolving Model-informed dynamic data optimization framework that uses model-aware data selection and context-preserving data refinement.Unlike conventional one-off filtering/synthesis methods, our framework establishes a closed-loop optimization system: (1) A self-referential diagnostic module proactively identifies suboptimal samples through tri-axial model signals-loss patterns (complexity), embedding cluster dynamics (diversity), and selfalignment scores (quality); (2) An adaptive optimization engine then transforms suboptimal samples into pedagogically valuable training points while preserving semantic integrity; (3) This optimization process continuously evolves with the model's capability through dynamic learning principles.Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that our Middo consistently enhances the quality of seed data and boosts LLMs' performance, improving accuracy by 7.15% on average while maintaining the original dataset scale.This work establishes a new paradigm for sustainable LLM training through dynamic human-AI co-evolution of data and models. Zinan Tang 0001, Xin Gao 0001, Qizhi Pei, Zhuoshi Pan, Mengzhang Cai, Jiang Wu 0003, Conghui He, Lijun Wu 0003 |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2025 | Spot the Fake: Large Multimodal Model-Based Synthetic Image Detection with Artifact ExplanationabstractWith the rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) technologies, synthetic images have become increasingly prevalent in everyday life, posing new challenges for authenticity assessment and detection. Despite the effectiveness of existing methods in evaluating image authenticity and locating forgeries, these approaches often lack human interpretability and do not fully address the growing complexity of synthetic data. To tackle these challenges, we introduce FakeVLM, a specialized large multimodal model designed for both general synthetic image and DeepFake detection tasks. FakeVLM not only excels in distinguishing real from fake images but also provides clear, natural language explanations for image artifacts, enhancing interpretability. Additionally, we present FakeClue, a comprehensive dataset containing over 100,000 images across seven categories, annotated with fine-grained artifact clues in natural language. FakeVLM demonstrates performance comparable to expert models while eliminating the need for additional classifiers, making it a robust solution for synthetic data detection. Extensive evaluations across multiple datasets confirm the superiority of FakeVLM in both authenticity classification and artifact explanation tasks, setting a new benchmark for synthetic image detection. The code, model weights, and dataset can be found here: https://github.com/opendatalab/FakeVLM. Siwei Wen, Junyan Ye, Peilin Feng, Hengrui Kang, Zichen Wen, Yize Chen, Jiang Wu 0003, Conghui He |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2024 | Benchmarking Chinese Commonsense Reasoning of LLMs: From Chinese-Specifics to Reasoning-Memorization CorrelationsabstractJiaxing Sun, Weiquan Huang, Jiang Wu, Chenya Gu, Wei Li, Songyang Zhang, Hang Yan, Conghui He. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Jiaxing Sun 0001, Weiquan Huang, Jiang Wu 0003, Chenya Gu, Wei Li 0320, Songyang Zhang 0001, Hang Yan 0001, Conghui He |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | HiCD: Change Detection in Quality-Varied Images via Hierarchical Correlation DistillationabstractAdvanced change detection techniques primarily target image pairs of equal and high quality. However, variations in imaging conditions and platforms frequently lead to image pairs with distinct qualities: one image being high-quality, while the other being low-quality. These disparities in image quality present significant challenges for understanding image pairs semantically and extracting change features, ultimately resulting in a notable decline in performance. To tackle this challenge, we introduce an innovative training strategy grounded in knowledge distillation. The core idea revolves around leveraging task knowledge acquired from high-quality image pairs to guide the model’s learning process when dealing with image pairs that exhibit differences in quality. Additionally, we develop a hierarchical correlation distillation approach (involving self-correlation, cross-correlation, and global correlation). This approach compels the student model to replicate the correlations inherent in the teacher model, rather than focusing solely on individual features. This ensures effective knowledge transfer while maintaining the student model’s training flexibility. Through extensive experimentation, we demonstrate the remarkable superiority of our methodologies in scenarios involving only resolution disparities, single-degradation, and multi-degradation quality differences. The codes will be released at https://github.com/fitzpchao/HiCD. Chao Pang 0001, Xingxing Weng, Jiang Wu 0003, Gui-Song Xia |
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens. | 3 |
| 2023 | Detecting building changes with off-nadir aerial images
Chao Pang 0001, Jiang Wu 0003, Jian Ding 0001, Can Song, Gui-Song Xia |
Sci. China Inf. Sci. | 2 |