Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sergio García 0003
dblp:69/6171-3
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
concurrent engineering |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Concurrent Engineering support in Software Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software process |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Concurrent Engineering support in Software Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software design methodology |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Concurrent Engineering support in Software Engineering · ASE 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workflow modeling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Concurrent Engineering support in Software EngineeringabstractThe evolution of software engineering methodology, from waterfall to spiral, from spiral to agile, indicates that high concurrency, iterative development and short cycles are key factors for effective software engineering. It is widely accepted that supporting (i.e., formalizing controlling, automating and optimizing) concurrent engineering processes is needed to increase predictability of cost, quality and development time. Unfortunately, current systems (e.g., workflows, software configuration management, ...) are too simple and deterministic; they do not include real support for concurrent engineering. We claim this shortcoming is one of the major reasons why current workflow and process support do not significantly help in the support of software engineering. In this paper we present the Celine system, which extends workflows with the definition of high-level executable description of concurrent engineering and therefore contributes to provide effective control over cost, quality and development time Jacky Estublier, Sergio García 0003 |
ASE | 2 |