Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward I. George

dblp:70/5339 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 13%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
bayesian additive regression trees
0.112006
Bayesian Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
bayesian ensemble methods
0.112006
Bayesian Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.112006
Bayesian Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.112006
Bayesian Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting
0.012006
Bayesian Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2006
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.012006
Bayesian Ensemble Learning · NIPS 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weak learners · 0.1sum-of-trees model · 0.1backfitting MCMC · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Determinantal Regularization for Ensemble Variable Selection
abstract
Recent years have seen growing interest in deterministic search approaches to spike-and-slab Bayesian variable selection. Such methods have focused on the goal of finding a global mode to identify a “best model”. However, the report of a single model will be a misleading reflection of the model uncertainty inherent in a highly multimodal posterior. Motivated by non-parametric variational Bayes strategies, we move beyond this limitation by proposing an ensemble optimization approach to identify a collection of representative posterior modes. By deploying determinantal penalty functions as diversity regularizers, our approach performs regularization over multiple locations of the posterior. The key driver of these determinantal penalties is a kernel function that induces repulsion in the latent model space domain.
Veronika Rocková, Gemma E. Moran, Edward I. George
AISTATS3
2006 Bayesian Ensemble Learning
abstract
We develop a Bayesian "sum-of-trees" model, named BART, where each tree is constrained by a prior to be a weak learner. Fitting and inference are accomplished via an iterative backfitting MCMC algorithm. This model is motivated by ensemble methods in general, and boosting algorithms in particular. Like boosting, each weak learner (i.e., each weak tree) contributes a small amount to the overall model. However, our procedure is defined by a statistical model: a prior and a likelihood, while boosting is defined by an algorithm. This model-based approach enables a full and accurate assessment of uncertainty in model predictions, while remaining highly competitive in terms of predictive accuracy.
Hugh A. Chipman, Edward I. George, Robert E. McCulloch
NIPS2
2002 Bayesian Treed Models
Hugh A. Chipman, Edward I. George, Robert E. McCulloch
Mach. Learn.2