Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ge Zhang 0002
dblp:70/6366-2
· DBLP profile ↗
19ranked-venue papers
7as first author
17since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6009-780XORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 12 · 3 first-author · 11 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
12 papers |
Graph learning · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Language models and text generation · 7% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
10 papers |
Data mining · 91% Web and social media mining · 8% Machine learning and data management · 1% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 33, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph anomaly detection
graph-level anomaly detection |
2.9 | 3 | 2026 | Learning Subgraph-Based Normality for Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 Generalizable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Prompted Anomaly Expansion and Normality Extraction · WWW 2026 Global Interpretable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Prototype · KDD (2) 2025 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › graph anomaly detection
graph-level anomaly detection |
2.6 | 3 | 2026 | Learning From Graph-Graph Relationship: A New Perspective on Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 Revisiting Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: From Partially to Fully Unsupervised Learning · WWW 2026 Dual-discriminative Graph Neural Network for Imbalanced Graph-level Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
2.3 | 4 | 2026 | Revisiting Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: From Partially to Fully Unsupervised Learning · WWW 2026 eFraudCom: An E-commerce Fraud Detection System via Competitive Graph Neural Networks · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2022 FRAUDRE: Fraud Detection Dual-Resistant to Graph Inconsistency and Imbalance · ICDM 2021 |
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining |
2.0 | 3 | 2026 | Learning From Graph-Graph Relationship: A New Perspective on Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 eFraudCom: An E-commerce Fraud Detection System via Competitive Graph Neural Networks · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2022 Detecting Communities with Multiplex Semantics by Distinguishing Background, General, and Specialized Topics · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph anomaly detection |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | Learning Subgraph-Based Normality for Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 Generalizable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Prompted Anomaly Expansion and Normality Extraction · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.9 | 2 | 2026 | Learning Subgraph-Based Normality for Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 Global Interpretable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Prototype · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | CINA: Curvature-Based Integrated Network Alignment with Hypergraph · ICDE 2024 Minimum Entropy Principle Guided Graph Neural Networks · WSDM 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
1.3 | 3 | 2023 | Minimum Entropy Principle Guided Graph Neural Networks · WSDM 2023 FRAUDRE: Fraud Detection Dual-Resistant to Graph Inconsistency and Imbalance · ICDM 2021 Dual-discriminative Graph Neural Network for Imbalanced Graph-level Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
1.1 | 3 | 2025 | Minimum Entropy Principle Guided Graph Neural Networks · WSDM 2023 Conformal Graph-level Out-of-distribution Detection with Adaptive Data Augmentation · WWW 2025 Dual-discriminative Graph Neural Network for Imbalanced Graph-level Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
fraud detection |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | eFraudCom: An E-commerce Fraud Detection System via Competitive Graph Neural Networks · ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 2022 FRAUDRE: Fraud Detection Dual-Resistant to Graph Inconsistency and Imbalance · ICDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
anomaly explanation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning Subgraph-Based Normality for Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
entity alignment |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | EA-Agent: A Structured Multi-Step Reasoning Agent for Entity Alignment · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › agentic language model
tool-augmented language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool Invocations · ACL (1) 2026 |
Web and social media mining › misinformation detection
fake news detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Semi-Supervised Fake News Detection with Mixture of Experts · WWW 2026 |
Data mining › representation learning
graph representation learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Learning From Graph-Graph Relationship: A New Perspective on Graph-Level Anomaly Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2026 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
unsupervised anomaly detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Revisiting Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: From Partially to Fully Unsupervised Learning · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conformal Graph-level Out-of-distribution Detection with Adaptive Data Augmentation · WWW 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › out-of-distribution detection
graph out-of-distribution detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conformal Graph-level Out-of-distribution Detection with Adaptive Data Augmentation · WWW 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conformal Graph-level Out-of-distribution Detection with Adaptive Data Augmentation · WWW 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › example-based explanation
prototype-based explanation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Global Interpretable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Prototype · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Conformal Graph-level Out-of-distribution Detection with Adaptive Data Augmentation · WWW 2025 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Detecting Communities with Multiplex Semantics by Distinguishing Background, General, and Specialized Topics · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020 Finding Communities with Hierarchical Semantics by Distinguishing General and Specialized topics · IJCAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CINA: Curvature-Based Integrated Network Alignment with Hypergraph · ICDE 2024 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
network alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CINA: Curvature-Based Integrated Network Alignment with Hypergraph · ICDE 2024 |
Data mining › anomaly detection
graph anomaly detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Dual-discriminative Graph Neural Network for Imbalanced Graph-level Anomaly Detection · NeurIPS 2022 |
Data mining › anomaly detection › fraud detection
graph-based fraud detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FRAUDRE: Fraud Detection Dual-Resistant to Graph Inconsistency and Imbalance · ICDM 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › agentic AI
agentic reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | EA-Agent: A Structured Multi-Step Reasoning Agent for Entity Alignment · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Semi-Supervised Fake News Detection with Mixture of Experts · WWW 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty-aware learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Revisiting Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: From Partially to Fully Unsupervised Learning · WWW 2026 |
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
graph learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Semi-Supervised Fake News Detection with Mixture of Experts · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 4.7information bottleneck · 2.7pseudo-labeling · 2.0one-class classification · 2.0masked transformer · 2.0uncertainty learning · 1.0triple selection · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0rebalancing strategy · 1.0multi-step planning · 1.0large language model · 1.0expectation-maximization · 1.0contrastive attention attribution · 1.0prototype learning · 0.9maximum mean discrepancy · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Do LLMs Know Tool Irrelevance? Demystifying Structural Alignment Bias in Tool InvocationsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in utilizing external tools.In practice, however, LLMs are often exposed to tools that are irrelevant to the user's query, in which case the desired behavior is to refrain from invocations.In this work, we identify a widespread yet overlooked mechanistic flaw in tool refusal, which we term structural alignment bias: Even when a tool fails to serve the user's goal, LLMs still tend to invoke it whenever query attributes can be validly assigned to tool parameters.To systematically study this bias, we introduce SABEval, a new dataset that decouples structural alignment from semantic relevance.Our analysis shows that structural alignment bias induces severe tool-invocation errors in LLMs, yet remains largely unaccounted for in existing evaluations.To investigate the internal mechanisms underlying this bias, we propose Contrastive Attention Attribution, which reveals two competing pathways for semantic checking and structural matching.The relative strength of these pathways drives LLMs' tool invocation decisions.Based on these findings, we further introduce a rebalancing strategy that effectively mitigates structural alignment bias, as demonstrated by extensive experiments, without degrading general tool-use capabilities.Our code and dataset are available at https://github. com/along-l/irrelevant-tool. Can you tell me if 'Spider-Man: Miles Morales' is on sale on the Canadian PlayStation Store?"name": "check_nintendo_switch_game_on_sale", "description": "Checks if a particular game is currently on sale on the Nintendo Switch Store.","parameters": { "game_title": {"type": "string", "description": "The title of the video game."},"region": {"type": "string", "description": "The region to check for the Nintendo Switch Store."}} Xixun Lin, Ge Zhang 0002, Fang Fang 0009, Yanan Cao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2026 | EA-Agent: A Structured Multi-Step Reasoning Agent for Entity AlignmentabstractEntity alignment (EA) aims to identify entities across different knowledge graphs (KGs) that refer to the same real-world object and plays a critical role in knowledge fusion and integration.Traditional EA methods mainly rely on knowledge representation learning, but their performance is often limited under noisy or sparsely supervised scenarios.Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been introduced to EA and achieved notable improvements by leveraging rich semantic knowledge.However, existing LLM-based EA approaches typically treat LLMs as black-box decision makers, resulting in limited interpretability, and the direct use of large-scale triples substantially increases inference cost.To address these challenges, we propose EA-Agent, a reasoningdriven agent for EA.EA-Agent formulates EA as a structured reasoning process with multistep planning and execution, enabling interpretable alignment decisions.Within this process, it introduces attribute and relation triple selectors to filter redundant triples before feeding them into the LLM, effectively addressing efficiency challenges.Experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that EA-Agent consistently outperforms existing EA methods and achieves state-of-the-art performance.The source code is available at https: //github.com/YXNan0110/EA-Agent. Yixuan Nan, Xixun Lin, Yanmin Shang, Ge Zhang 0002, Zheng Fang 0002, Fang Fang 0009, Yanan Cao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 4 |
| 2026 | Community-Aware Graph Contrastive Learning for Long-Tail Crowdsourcing Truth Inference
Xiu Susie Fang, Heting Liang, Yuqiong Yi, Xinwei Huang, Guohao Sun 0001, Ge Zhang 0002 |
DASFAA (3) | 6 |
| 2026 | Semi-Supervised Fake News Detection with Mixture of ExpertsabstractSingle-expert fake news detectors, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Large Language Models (LLMs), increasingly struggle to counter the diversifying camouflage tactics of modern adversaries, which range from semantic (e.g., mimicking writing styles) to structural (e.g., manipulating propagation paths). To address this, existing methods attempt to build a hybrid model by sequentially incorporating GNNs and LLMs; however, such hybridization blurs the distinction between experts and prevents critical cross-validation. In addition, existing methods rely heavily on vast labeled data, which is costly to acquire, particularly for fake news samples. In this paper, we propose a Semi-supervised Mixture of Experts framework for Fake news detection, namely S2MOE-F. The core idea of S2MOE-F is to establish a robust defense against multifaceted camouflage by cross-validating the complementary judgments of two independent experts, GNN and LLM. On the one hand, S2MOE-F drives experts' judgments by using a One-Class Classification (OCC) objective, which constrains true news within a compact hypersphere and identifies samples outside this boundary as fake, reducing reliance on scarce fake news labels. On the other hand, S2MOE-F generates high-confidence pseudo-labels based on consensus or divergence between experts to exploit abundant unlabeled data. In addition, we propose a novel reinforcement learning (RL)-based routing policy that dynamically determines the dominant expert for input samples without explicit supervision. Finally, we design a disentangled masked Transformer to ensure experts' specialization by reducing inter-expert redundancy. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets sourced from Web platforms and social media demonstrate the superior performance of S2MOE-F. Zhenyu Yang 0004, Chaoyu Yang, Xiuxiu Hao, Ge Zhang 0002, Xiaoxiao Ma 0002, Jun Shen 0001 |
WWW | 6 |
| 2026 | Revisiting Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: From Partially to Fully Unsupervised LearningabstractGraph-level anomaly detection (GLAD) is a critical task to identify graphs with abnormal properties in various domains, ranging from fraudulent social networks to malicious botnets on online platforms. The dominant paradigm for existing GLAD detectors has been partially unsupervised, relying on training data composed exclusively of normal samples. However, this partially unsupervised paradigm inevitably requires a costly expert filtering process to ensure the training data is free of anomalies. This creates a significant gap between current approaches and the real-world necessity of a fully unsupervised paradigm, which involves training a model directly on real-world data ''as-is'', with its inherent mix of normal and anomalous samples. To bridge this gap, we incorporate uncertainty learning into GLAD to promote fully unsupervised learning. We propose two frameworks: Score Uncertainty Learning (SUL) and Graph-data Uncertainty Learning (GUL). Specifically, SUL enhances existing GLAD detectors by modeling uncertainty through Gaussian distributions over the detectors' predictions, adaptively attenuating the influence of potential anomalies. GUL is an end-to-end framework that iteratively optimizes anomaly detection and uncertainty modeling via an Expectation-Maximization algorithm. In addition, we develop a dedicated loss that utilizes potential anomalies to enhance the effectiveness and robustness of GUL. Empirical results on sixteen benchmark datasets, covering real-world graphs from social networks and online platforms, demonstrate the superiority of our methods and highlight the promise of incorporating uncertainty into fully unsupervised GLAD. Zhenyu Yang 0004, Ge Zhang 0002, Shan Xue 0001, Xiaoxiao Ma 0002, Jian Yang 0001, Hao Peng 0001, Amin Beheshti, Jia Wu 0001 |
WWW | 2 |
| 2026 | Generalizable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via Prompted Anomaly Expansion and Normality Extraction
Ge Zhang 0002, Jiapei Chen, Guohao Sun 0001, Xiu Susie Fang, Zhenyu Yang 0004, Xixun Lin, Liang Yang 0002 |
WWW | 1 |
| 2026 | Learning Subgraph-Based Normality for Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly DetectionabstractGraph-level anomaly detection (GLAD) aims to identify graphs that significantly deviate from others in a graph dataset. Existing methods predominantly rely on standard Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) to learn graph representations, but they often overlook subgraph-level information, which provides essential structural and semantic cues for distinguishing normal and anomalous graphs. This limitation not only compromises the detection performance but also hinders the interpretability of GLAD predictions. To address these challenges, we propose NGLAD, a novel framework that introduces the concept of normality-relevant subgraphs that capture shared patterns across normal graphs. These subgraphs serve as key indicators to distinguish normal graphs from anomalies that that often lack or deviate from such patterns. During model training, by explicitly modeling the shared subgraph patterns inherent in normal graphs through a Subgraph Extractor and a Normality Learner, NGLAD identifies the subgraphs most relevant to normality. Leveraging the One-class Information Bottleneck principle, these modules ensure that the extracted subgraphs retain only the most informative features of normality while filtering out irrelevant nodes and edges. During inference, NGLAD detects anomalies by evaluating inconsistencies in representations between the input graph and its extracted subgraph. Extensive evaluations on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that NGLAD significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in detection performance while offering interpretable explanations. Ge Zhang 0002, Zhenyu Yang 0004, Jia Wu 0001, Pengfei Jiao, Jian Yang 0001, Hao Peng 0001, Xixun Lin |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |
| 2026 | Learning From Graph-Graph Relationship: A New Perspective on Graph-Level Anomaly Detection
Zhenyu Yang 0004, Ge Zhang 0002, Jia Wu 0001, Jian Yang 0001, Hao Peng 0001, Pietro Liò |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 2 |
| 2025 | Global Interpretable Graph-level Anomaly Detection via PrototypeabstractGraph-level anomaly detection (GLAD) identifies graphs exhibiting abnormal properties within a graph dataset.Despite promising results in this task, the state-of-the-art methods cannot be fully trusted and deployed in realistic scenarios due to their black-box nature.To alleviate this, existing methods try to explain predictions by extracting important subgraphs from each graph, as instancelevel explanations.However, instance-level explanations across all samples are costly to verify and insufficient to capture the model's general behaviors.Thus, we propose a global interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly Detection model via Prototype (GLADPro), which provides global-level explanations throughout the entire dataset, that is, the significant subgraph patterns that consistently influence the model's decisions.Specifically, GLADPro incorporates prototype learning with the information bottleneck principle, enabling prototypes to capture the most significant subgraph patterns as global-level explanations through persistent interactions with key subgraphs from input graphs.In addition, a regularization term is proposed to prevent the collapse traps with theoretical proof.Finally, we filter redundant prototypes using the maximum mean discrepancy metric.Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of GLADPro in anomaly detection and explainability; for instance, on the mutagen dataset, it reduces the number of explanations to verify from 1403 to only 6. Zhenyu Yang 0004, Ge Zhang 0002, Jia Wu 0001, Jian Yang 0001, Shan Xue 0001, Amin Beheshti, Hao Peng 0001, Quan Z. Sheng |
KDD (2) | 2 |
| 2025 | A Neural Subgraph Counting Method Based on Matching Matrix
Guohao Sun 0001, Jiale Lv, Xiu Susie Fang, Ge Zhang 0002 |
PRICAI | 6 |
| 2025 | Conformal Graph-level Out-of-distribution Detection with Adaptive Data AugmentationabstractGraph-level out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, which attempts to identify OOD graphs originated from an unknown distribution, is a vital building block for safety-critical applications in Web and society. Current approaches concentrate on how to learn better graph representations, but fail to provide any statistically guarantee on detection results, therefore impeding their deployments in the scenario where detection errors would result in serious consequences. To overcome this critical issue, we propose the Conformal Graph-level Out-of-distribution Detection (CGOD), extending the theory of conformal prediction to graph-level OOD detection with a rigorous control over the false positive rate. In CGOD, we develop a new aggregated non-conformity score function based on the proposed adaptive data augmentation. Through the guidance from two designed metrics, i.e., score consistency and representation diversity, our augmentation strategy can generate multiple non-conformity scores, and aggregating these generated non-conformity scores together is robust to the misleading information. Meanwhile, our score function can perceive the subsequent process of conformal inference, enabling the aggregated non-conformity score to be adaptive to different input graphs and deriving a more accurate score estimation. We conduct experiments on multiple real-world datasets with different empirical settings. Extensive results and model analyses demonstrate the superior performance of our approach over several competitive baselines. Xixun Lin, Yanan Cao 0001, Lixin Zou, Chuan Zhou 0001, Peng Zhang 0001, Shuai Zhang 0007, Ge Zhang 0002, Jia Wu 0001 |
WWW | 8 |
| 2025 | Enhancing Graph Neural Networks for Out-of-Distribution Graph DetectionabstractGraph neural networks (GNNs) have shown promise in graph classification tasks, but they struggle to identify out-of-distribution (OOD) graphs often encountered in real-world scenarios, posing a significant obstacle for their open-world deployment. Due to the unpredictable nature of the various distributions to which OOD graphs adhere, the challenge of OOD graph detection lies in enabling models to capture distribution differences between in-distribution (ID) and OOD graphs. Current methods often introduce a subset of OOD patterns, such as synthetic OOD graphs, to facilitate learning the discrimination between ID and OOD graphs. However, these OOD patterns may not sufficiently encapsulate the entire range of OOD graphs, leading to inadequate learning of the distribution differences between ID and OOD graphs. In this article, we propose a novel OOD graph detection algorithm, ODGNN. The ODGNN does not expose GNNs to any OOD patterns during model training, thus reducing bias toward specific types of OOD graph samples and enhancing OOD graph detection. The algorithm differentiates graphs by evaluating whether the input graphs conform to established ID graph class-conditioned distributions. Specifically, during model training, the ODGNN integrates a Gaussian encoder into GNNs to characterize ID graph classes using distinct class-conditioned distributions. During inference, OOD graphs are mapped to a representation space distant from ID graphs due to their divergence from any known class-conditioned distribution. Extensive experiments conducted on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of the ODGNN in enhancing OOD detection performance across various GNN-based graph classification models. The ODGNN also demonstrates superior performance compared to state-of-the-art OOD graph detection competitors. Ge Zhang 0002, Zhenyu Yang 0004, Jia Wu 0001, Pengfei Jiao, Jian Yang 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 1 |
| 2024 | CINA: Curvature-Based Integrated Network Alignment with HypergraphabstractNetwork alignment involves identifying corresponding nodes across multiple networks. The majority of existing methods adhere to the assumption of consistency. However, due to distinct graph generation mechanisms, anchor nodes in real-world datasets often exhibit more intricate structural patterns, such as having multiple different neighbors and higher-order associations. Relying solely on consistency while disregarding the intricate patterns of anchor links may potentially inflict substantial detriment upon both the accuracy of network alignment and the generality of the model. In this paper, we introduce the disparity and diversity based on distinct structural patterns of ubiquitous anchor links. We propose a comprehensive framework that employs first-order proximity, lower-order discriminability, and higher-order correlation to model consistency, disparity, and diversity. We also incorporate a post-fusion mechanism for effectively integrating alignment matrices. Furthermore, we innovatively introduce hyperbolic space as an embedding space to further minimize embedding distortion. Extensive experiments have shown that our approach achieves state-of-the-art alignment results and yields notable improvements in the overall versatility of the model. Pengfei Jiao, Yuanqi Liu, Yinghui Wang 0005, Ge Zhang 0002 |
ICDE | 4 |
| 2023 | Minimum Entropy Principle Guided Graph Neural NetworksabstractGraph neural networks (GNNs) are now the mainstream method for mining graph-structured data and learning low-dimensional node- and graph-level embeddings to serve downstream tasks. However, limited by the bottleneck of interpretability that deep neural networks present, existing GNNs have ignored the issue of estimating the appropriate number of dimensions for the embeddings. Hence, we propose a novel framework called Minimum Graph Entropy principle-guided Dimension Estimation, i.e. MGEDE, that learns the appropriate embedding dimensions for both node and graph representations. In terms of node-level estimation, a minimum entropy function that counts both structure and attribute entropy, appraises the appropriate number of dimensions. In terms of graph-level estimation, each graph is assigned a customized embedding dimension from a candidate set based on the number of dimensions estimated for the node-level embeddings. Comprehensive experiments with node and graph classification tasks and nine benchmark datasets verify the effectiveness and generalizability of MGEDE. Zhenyu Yang 0004, Ge Zhang 0002, Jia Wu 0001, Jian Yang 0001, Quan Z. Sheng, Hao Peng 0001, Angsheng Li, Shan Xue 0001, Jianlin Su |
WSDM | 2 |
| 2022 | Dual-discriminative Graph Neural Network for Imbalanced Graph-level Anomaly DetectionabstractGraph-level anomaly detection aims to distinguish anomalous graphs in a graph dataset from normal graphs. Anomalous graphs represent a very few but essential patterns in the real world. The anomalous property of a graph may be referable to its anomalous attributes of particular nodes and anomalous substructures that refer to a subset of nodes and edges in the graph. In addition, due to the imbalance nature of anomaly problem, anomalous information will be diluted by normal graphs with overwhelming quantities. Various anomaly notions in the attributes and/or substructures and the imbalance nature together make detecting anomalous graphs a non-trivial task. In this paper, we propose a graph neural network for graph-level anomaly detection, namely iGAD. Specifically, an anomalous graph attribute-aware graph convolution and an anomalous graph substructure-aware deep Random Walk Kernel (deep RWK) are welded into a graph neural network to achieve the dual-discriminative ability on anomalous attributes and substructures. Deep RWK in iGAD makes up for the deficiency of graph convolution in distinguishing structural information caused by the simple neighborhood aggregation mechanism. Further, we propose a Point Mutual Information (PMI)-based loss function to target the problems caused by imbalance distributions. PMI-based loss function enables iGAD to capture essential correlation between input graphs and their anomalous/normal properties. We evaluate iGAD on four real-world graph datasets. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of iGAD on the graph-level anomaly detection task. Ge Zhang 0002, Zhenyu Yang 0004, Jia Wu 0001, Jian Yang 0001, Shan Xue 0001, Hao Peng 0001, Jianlin Su, Chuan Zhou 0001, Quan Z. Sheng, Leman Akoglu, Charu C. Aggarwal |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | eFraudCom: An E-commerce Fraud Detection System via Competitive Graph Neural NetworksabstractWith the development of e-commerce, fraud behaviors have been becoming one of the biggest threats to the e-commerce business. Fraud behaviors seriously damage the ranking system of e-commerce platforms and adversely influence the shopping experience of users. It is of great practical value to detect fraud behaviors on e-commerce platforms. However, the task is non-trivial, since the adversarial action taken by fraudsters. Existing fraud detection systems used in the e-commerce industry easily suffer from performance decay and can not adapt to the upgrade of fraud patterns, as they take already known fraud behaviors as supervision information to detect other suspicious behaviors. In this article, we propose a competitive graph neural networks (CGNN)-based fraud detection system (eFraudCom) to detect fraud behaviors at one of the largest e-commerce platforms, “Taobao” 1 . In the eFraudCom system, (1) the competitive graph neural networks (CGNN) as the core part of eFraudCom can classify behaviors of users directly by modeling the distributions of normal and fraud behaviors separately; (2) some normal behaviors will be utilized as weak supervision information to guide the CGNN to build the profile for normal behaviors that are more stable than fraud behaviors. The algorithm dependency on fraud behaviors will be eliminated, which enables eFraudCom to detect fraud behaviors in presence of the new fraud patterns; (3) the mutual information regularization term can maximize the separability between normal and fraud behaviors to further improve CGNN. eFraudCom is implemented into a prototype system and the performance of the system is evaluated by extensive experiments. The experiments on two Taobao and two public datasets demonstrate that the proposed deep framework CGNN is superior to other baselines in detecting fraud behaviors. A case study on Taobao datasets verifies that CGNN is still robust when the fraud patterns have been upgraded. Ge Zhang 0002, Zhao Li 0007, Jia Wu 0001, Chuan Zhou 0001, Jian Yang 0001, Jianliang Gao |
ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2021 | FRAUDRE: Fraud Detection Dual-Resistant to Graph Inconsistency and ImbalanceabstractThe objective of fraud detection is to distinguish fraudsters from normal users. In graph/network environments, both fraudsters and normal users are modeled as nodes, and the connections between those nodes are represented as edges. Fraudsters typically try to camouflage themselves with “normal” behaviors, say, by deliberately establishing many connections to normal users. Such camouflage inherently makes their appearance inconsistent with the essence of what it is to be normal, and gives rise to inconsistencies in the graph. In this paper, we investigate three aspects of these graph inconsistencies: features, topologies, and relations. To date, graph-based fraud detectors have shown a rather limited capability to fuse information about different types of inconsistencies. Apart from that, there is another problem of imbalance to overcome. This is because fraudsters usually only account for a very small percentage of all users. To achieve a promising capability, i.e., dual-resistant to graph inconsistency and imbalance, we present a new fraud detection model FRAUDRE based on Graph Neural Networks. Extensive experiments comparing eight up-to-date baselines on two real-world datasets, Amazon and YelpChi, demonstrate the superiority of FRAUDRE. Ge Zhang 0002, Jia Wu 0001, Jian Yang 0001, Amin Beheshti, Shan Xue 0001, Chuan Zhou 0001, Quan Z. Sheng |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2020 | Detecting Communities with Multiplex Semantics by Distinguishing Background, General, and Specialized TopicsabstractFinding semantic communities using network topology and contents together is a hot topic in community detection. Existing methods often use word attributes in an indiscriminate way to help finding communities. Through analysis we find that, words in networked contents often embody a hierarchical semantic structure. Some words reflect a background topic of the whole network with all communities, some imply the high-level general topic covering several topic-related communities, and some imply the high-resolution specialized topic to describe each community. Ignoring such semantic structures often leads to defects in depicting networked contents where deep semantics are not fully utilized. To solve this problem, we propose a new Bayesian probabilistic model. By distinguishing words from either a background topic or some two-level topics (i.e., general and specialized topics), this model not only better utilizes the networked contents to help finding communities, but also provides a clearer multiplex semantic community interpretation. We then give an efficient variational algorithm for model inference. The superiority of this new approach is demonstrated by comparing with ten state-of-the-art methods on nine real networks and an artificial benchmark. A case study is further provided to show its strong ability in deep semantic interpretation of communities. Di Jin 0001, Kunzeng Wang, Ge Zhang 0002, Pengfei Jiao, Dongxiao He, Françoise Fogelman-Soulié, Xin Huang 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 3 |
| 2018 | Finding Communities with Hierarchical Semantics by Distinguishing General and Specialized topicsabstractUsing network topology and semantic contents to find topic-related communities is a new trend in the field of community detection. By analyzing texts in social networks, we find that topics in networked contents are often hierarchical. In most cases, they have a two-level semantic structure with general and specialized topics, to respectively denote common and specific interests of communities. However, the existing community detection methods ignore such a hierarchy and take all words used to describe node semantics from an identical perspective. This indiscriminate use of words leads to natural defects in depicting networked content in which the deep semantics is not fully utilized. To address this problem, we propose a novel probabilistic generative model. By distinguishing the general and specialized topics of words, our model not only can find community structures more accurately, but also provide two-level semantic interpretation for each community. We train the model by deriving an efficient inference method under the framework of variational expectation-maximization. We provide a case study to show the ability of our algorithm in deep semantic interpretability of communities. The superiority of our algorithm for community detection is further demonstrated in comparison with eight state-of-the-art algorithms on eight real-world networks. Ge Zhang 0002, Di Jin 0001, Pengfei Jiao, Françoise Fogelman-Soulié, Xin Huang 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |