Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Melonee Wise

dblp:70/8368 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 77% Robot navigation and mapping · 17% Motion planning and robot control · 5%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
mobile manipulation
0.222011
Towards autonomous robotic butlers: Lessons learned with the PR2 · ICRA 2011
Autonomous door opening and plugging in with a personal robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Robot manipulation
service robot
0.112011
Towards autonomous robotic butlers: Lessons learned with the PR2 · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › indoor navigation
indoor mobile robot navigation
0.112010
Autonomous door opening and plugging in with a personal robot · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
compliant motion control
0.012010
Autonomous door opening and plugging in with a personal robot · ICRA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

navigation · 0.1hierarchical concurrent state machines · 0.1grasping · 0.1arm motion planning · 0.1visual differencing · 0.1vision and laser sensing · 0.1compliant control · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Towards autonomous robotic butlers: Lessons learned with the PR2
abstract
As autonomous personal robots come of age, we expect certain applications to be executed with a high degree of repeatability and robustness. In order to explore these applications and their challenges, we need tools and strategies that allow us to develop them rapidly. Serving drinks (i.e., locating, fetching, and delivering), is one such application with well-defined environments for operation, requirements for human interfacing, and metrics for successful completion. In this paper we present our experiences and results while building an autonomous robotic assistant using the PR21platform and ROS2. The system integrates several new components that are built on top of the PR2's current capabilities. Perception components include dynamic obstacle identification, mechanisms for identifying the refrigerator, types of drinks, and human faces. Planning components include navigation, arm motion planning with goal and path constraints, and grasping modules. One of the main contributions of this paper is a new task-level executive system, SMACH, based on hierarchical concurrent state machines, which controls the overall behavior of the system. We provide in-depth discussions on the solutions that we found in accomplishing our goal, and the implementation strategies that let us achieve them.
Jonathan Bohren, Radu Bogdan Rusu, Edward Gil Jones, Eitan Marder-Eppstein, Caroline Pantofaru, Melonee Wise, Lorenz Mösenlechner, Wim Meeussen, Stefan Holzer
ICRA6
2010 Autonomous door opening and plugging in with a personal robot
abstract
We describe an autonomous robotic system capable of navigating through an office environment, opening doors along the way, and plugging itself into electrical outlets to recharge as needed. We demonstrate through extensive experimentation that our robot executes these tasks reliably, without requiring any modification to the environment. We present robust detection algorithms for doors, door handles, and electrical plugs and sockets, combining vision and laser sensors. We show how to overcome the unavoidable shortcoming of perception by integrating compliant control into manipulation motions. We present a visual-differencing approach to high-precision plug-insertion that avoids the need for high-precision hand-eye calibration.
Wim Meeussen, Melonee Wise, Stuart Glaser, Sachin Chitta, Conor McGann, Patrick Mihelich, Eitan Marder-Eppstein, Marius Muja, Victor Eruhimov, Tully Foote, John M. Hsu, Radu Bogdan Rusu, Bhaskara Marthi, Gary R. Bradski, Kurt Konolige, Brian P. Gerkey, Eric Berger
ICRA2