Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Isabelle R. E. Nett

dblp:70/8713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
phosphoproteomics
0.112010
Prophossi: automating expert validation of phosphopeptide-spectrum matches from tandem mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics
0.112010
Prophossi: automating expert validation of phosphopeptide-spectrum matches from tandem mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
tandem mass spectrometry
0.012010
Prophossi: automating expert validation of phosphopeptide-spectrum matches from tandem mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based validation · 0.1knowledge base · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Prophossi: automating expert validation of phosphopeptide-spectrum matches from tandem mass spectrometry
abstract
MOTIVATION: Complex patterns of protein phosphorylation mediate many cellular processes. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a powerful tool for identifying these post-translational modifications. In high-throughput experiments, mass spectrometry database search engines, such as MASCOT provide a ranked list of peptide identifications based on hundreds of thousands of MS/MS spectra obtained in a mass spectrometry experiment. These search results are not in themselves sufficient for confident assignment of phosphorylation sites as identification of characteristic mass differences requires time-consuming manual assessment of the spectra by an experienced analyst. The time required for manual assessment has previously rendered high-throughput confident assignment of phosphorylation sites challenging. RESULTS: We have developed a knowledge base of criteria, which replicate expert assessment, allowing more than half of cases to be automatically validated and site assignments verified with a high degree of confidence. This was assessed by comparing automated spectral interpretation with careful manual examination of the assignments for 501 peptides above the 1% false discovery rate (FDR) threshold corresponding to 259 putative phosphorylation sites in 74 proteins of the Trypanosoma brucei proteome. Despite this stringent approach, we are able to validate 80 of the 91 phosphorylation sites (88%) positively identified by manual examination of the spectra used for the MASCOT searches with a FDR < 15%. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput computational analysis can provide a viable second stage validation of primary mass spectrometry database search results. Such validation gives rapid access to a systems level overview of protein phosphorylation in the experiment under investigation. AVAILABILITY: A GPL licensed software implementation in Perl for analysis and spectrum annotation is available in the supplementary material and a web server can be assessed online at http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/prophossi.
David M. A. Martin, Isabelle R. E. Nett, Franck Vandermoere, Jonathan D. Barber, Nicholas A. Morrice, Michael A. J. Ferguson
Bioinform.2