Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ulrich Schneider

dblp:71/10335 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 62% Optimization for machine learning · 29% Robot manipulation · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.322016
High accurate robotic drilling with external sensor and compliance model-based compensation · ICRA 2016
Automatic pose optimization for robotic processes · ICRA 2015
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
error compensation
0.212016
High accurate robotic drilling with external sensor and compliance model-based compensation · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot manipulation › industrial robot
drilling robot
0.112016
High accurate robotic drilling with external sensor and compliance model-based compensation · ICRA 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

external sensor-based compensation · 0.2compliance model-based compensation · 0.2stiffness identification · 0.2optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 High accurate robotic drilling with external sensor and compliance model-based compensation
abstract
High accurate absolute robot positioning is a requirement, and still a challenge, in many applications, such as drilling in the aerospace industry. The accuracy is affected due to many sources of errors from robot model, tool calibration, sensor and product uncertainties. While model-based error compensation cannot reach the desired accuracy, sensor-based compensation appears as the practical solution to increase the robot positioning accuracy. A structured analysis of the error sources in robotic manufacturing processes can facilitate error identification and further compensation. This paper describes an error source breaking down approach for analyzing robotic manufacturing processes. Moreover, an external sensor-based compensation is proposed for error reduction and error identification. Comparison with a compliance model-based compensation is performed. The proposed approach is applied to a robotic drilling process for aircraft manufacturing, considered a general and real industrial application. Further validation through experimentation is performed. The validation revealed a clear improvement in robot positioning accuracy and the benefits of the proposed error source structure for analysis.
Julian Ricardo Diaz Posada, Ulrich Schneider, Sergej Pidan, Milad Geravand, Patrick Stelzer, Alexander Verl
ICRA2
2015 Automatic pose optimization for robotic processes
abstract
In many robotic processes such as milling and drilling, there are multiple solutions for robot poses, as the rotation around the tool axis remains as a degree of freedom (DoF) in positioning. Yet until now, this DoF causes additional efforts in CAM programming as it requires manual intervention. Instead, this DoF can be used to optimize the robot pose according to different criteria of the robot such as stiffness or avoidance of backlash effects. This paper presents different criteria for optimization of the robot pose in machining and describes the optimization of robot stiffness based on a novel method for its identification, which is in detail described on this paper. Furthermore, the potential of the automatic resolution of the DoF is outlined enabling staff without robot knowledge to define reasonable robot paths.
Ulrich Schneider, Julian Ricardo Diaz Posada, Alexander Verl
ICRA1
2014 Stiffness modeling of industrial robots for deformation compensation in machining
abstract
In robotic machining applications, the precision of the robot is of great importance. In heavy machining process, the lower stiffness of industrial robots results in greater position errors than that of the CNC machine executing the same process. In this contribution, a new stiffness model with 36 degrees of freedom and nonlinear descriptions are presented together with a new identification method. Experimental results outline the potential of the model in machining application.
Ulrich Schneider, Mahdi Momeni-K, Matteo Ansaloni, Alexander Verl
IROS1
2011 Modeling and control of a piezo-actuated high-dynamic compensation mechanism for industrial robots
abstract
This paper presents a method for modeling and control of a piezo-actuated high-dynamic compensation mechanism for usage together with an industrial robot during a machining operation, such as milling in aluminium. The machining spindle was attached to the compensation mechanism and the robot held the workpiece. Due to the inherent resonant character of mechanical constructions of this type, and the nonlinear phenomena appearing in piezo actuators, control of the compensation mechanism is a challenging problem. This paper presents models of the construction, experimentally identified using subspace-based identification methods. A subsequent control scheme, based on the identified models, utilizing state feedback for controlling the position of the spindle is outlined. Results from experiments performed on a prototype of the compensation mechanism are also provided.
Bjorn Olofsson, Olof Sörnmo, Ulrich Schneider, Anders Robertsson, Arnold Puzik, Rolf Johansson 0001
IROS3