Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James D. Watson

dblp:72/363 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6077-4898ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Quantum computing and quantum information · 79% Computational complexity · 21%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum circuit simulation
classical simulation
0.912025
Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy IQP Circuits with Constant Depth · SODA 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum circuit simulation
0.912025
Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy IQP Circuits with Constant Depth · SODA 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum computing
quantum supremacy
0.912025
Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy IQP Circuits with Constant Depth · SODA 2025
Computational complexity › query complexity
sampling complexity
0.912025
Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy IQP Circuits with Constant Depth · SODA 2025
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum complexity theory
0.612022
Computational complexity of the ground state energy density problem · STOC 2022
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum complexity theory
hamiltonian complexity
0.212022
Computational complexity of the ground state energy density problem · STOC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

depolarizing noise · 0.9dephasing noise · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Polynomial-Time Classical Simulation of Noisy IQP Circuits with Constant Depth
abstract
Sampling from the output distributions of quantum computations comprising only commuting gates, known as instantaneous quantum polynomial (IQP) computations, is believed to be intractable for classical computers, and hence this task has become a leading candidate for testing the capabilities of quantum devices. Here we demonstrate that for an arbitrary IQP circuit undergoing dephasing or depolarizing noise, whose depth is greater than a critical O (1) threshold, the output distribution can be efficiently sampled by a classical computer. Unlike other simulation algorithms for quantum supremacy tasks, we do not require assumptions on the circuit’s architecture, on anti-concentration properties, nor do we require Ω(log (n )) circuit depth. We take advantage of the fact that IQP circuits have deep sections of diagonal gates, which allows the noise to build up predictably and induce a large-scale breakdown of entanglement within the circuit. Our results suggest that quantum supremacy experiments based on IQP circuits may be more susceptible to classical simulation than previously thought. Furthermore, we show that the critical depth threshold of our algorithm is tight, and below this threshold there are noisy IQP circuits which are hard to sample from. Thus we demonstrate that noisy IQP circuits exhibit a phase transition in the computational complexity of sampling, as circuit depth is increased.
Joel Rajakumar, James D. Watson, Yi-Kai Liu 0001
SODA2
2023 The Complexity of Translationally Invariant Problems Beyond Ground State Energies
abstract
It is known that three fundamental questions regarding local Hamiltonians -- approximating the ground state energy (the Local Hamiltonian problem), simulating local measurements on the ground space (APX-SIM), and deciding if the low energy space has an energy barrier (GSCON) -- are $\mathsf{QMA}$-hard, $\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{QMA}[log]}$-hard and $\mathsf{QCMA}$-hard, respectively, meaning they are likely intractable even on a quantum computer. Yet while hardness for the Local Hamiltonian problem is known to hold even for translationally-invariant systems, it is not yet known whether APX-SIM and GSCON remain hard in such "simple" systems. In this work, we show that the translationally invariant versions of both APX-SIM and GSCON remain intractable, namely are $\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{QMA}_{\mathsf{EXP}}}$- and $\mathsf{QCMA}_{\mathsf{EXP}}$-complete, respectively. Each of these results is attained by giving a respective generic "lifting theorem" for producing hardness results. For APX-SIM, for example, we give a framework for "lifting" any abstract local circuit-to-Hamiltonian mapping $H$ (satisfying mild assumptions) to hardness of APX-SIM on the family of Hamiltonians produced by $H$, while preserving the structural and geometric properties of $H$ (e.g. translation invariance, geometry, locality, etc). Each result also leverages counterintuitive properties of our constructions: for APX-SIM, we "compress" the answers to polynomially many parallel queries to a QMA oracle into a single qubit. For GSCON, we give a hardness construction robust against highly non-local unitaries, i.e. even if the adversary acts on all but one qudit in the system in each step.
James D. Watson, Johannes Bausch, Sevag Gharibian
STACS1
2022 Computational complexity of the ground state energy density problem
abstract
We study the complexity of finding the ground state energy density of a local Hamiltonian on a lattice in the thermodynamic limit of infinite lattice size. We formulate this rigorously as a function problem, in which we request an estimate of the ground state energy density to some specified precision; and as an equivalent promise problem, GSED, in which we ask whether the ground state energy density is above or below specified thresholds.
James D. Watson, Toby S. Cubitt
STOC1
2009 A Proposal for a Coordinated Effort for the Determination of Brainwide Neuroanatomical Connectivity in Model Organisms at a Mesoscopic Scale
abstract
In this era of complete genomes, our knowledge of neuroanatomical circuitry remains surprisingly sparse. Such knowledge is critical, however, for both basic and clinical research into brain function. Here we advocate for a concerted effort to fill this gap, through systematic, experimental mapping of neural circuits at a mesoscopic scale of resolution suitable for comprehensive, brainwide coverage, using injections of tracers or viral vectors. We detail the scientific and medical rationale and briefly review existing knowledge and experimental techniques. We define a set of desiderata, including brainwide coverage; validated and extensible experimental techniques suitable for standardization and automation; centralized, open-access data repository; compatibility with existing resources; and tractability with current informatics technology. We discuss a hypothetical but tractable plan for mouse, additional efforts for the macaque, and technique development for human. We estimate that the mouse connectivity project could be completed within five years with a comparatively modest budget.
Jason W. Bohland, Caizhi Wu, Helen Barbas, Hemant Bokil, Mihail Bota, Hans C. Breiter, Hollis T. Cline, John Doyle 0001, Peter J. Freed, Ralph J. Greenspan, Suzanne N. Haber, Michael Hawrylycz, Daniel G. Herrera, Claus C. Hilgetag, Z. Josh Huang, Allan Jones, Edward G. Jones, Harvey J. Karten, David Kleinfeld, Rolf Kötter, Henry A. Lester, John M. Lin, Brett D. Mensh, Shawn Mikula, Jaak Panksepp, Joseph L. Price, Joseph Safdieh, Clifford B. Saper, Nicholas D. Schiff, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Bruce W. Stillman, Karel Svoboda, Larry W. Swanson, Arthur W. Toga, David C. Van Essen, James D. Watson, Partha P. Mitra
PLoS Comput. Biol.36