Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hidde L. Ploegh
dblp:72/4171
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
post-translational modification |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Preferred in vivo ubiquitination sites · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
protein structure and function |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Preferred in vivo ubiquitination sites · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis › protein sequence annotation
ubiquitination site prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Preferred in vivo ubiquitination sites · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structural analysis · 0.0sequence analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Preferred in vivo ubiquitination sitesabstractMOTIVATION: The conjugation of ubiquitin to target molecules involves several enzymatic steps. Little is known about the specificity of ubiquitination. How E3 ligases select their substrate and which lysines are targeted for ubiquitin conjugation is largely an enigma. The object of this study is to identify preferred ubiquitination sites. Genetic approaches to study this question have proven difficult, because of the redundancy of ligases and the lack of strictly required motifs. However, a better understanding of acceptor site selection could help to predict ubiquitination sites and clarify yet unsolved structure-function relationships of the transfer reaction. RESULTS: In an effort to define preferences for ubiquitination, we systematically analyzed structure and sequence of 135 known ubiquitination sites in 95 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The results show clear structural preferences for ubiquitin ligation to target proteins, and compartment-specific amino acid patterns in close proximity to the modified side chain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~catic. André Catic, Cal T. Collins, George M. Church, Hidde L. Ploegh |
Bioinform. | 4 |