Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. D. Lunn
dblp:72/5061
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › test coverage
code coverage |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Model of Code Sharing for Estimating Software Failure on Demand Probabilities · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1995 |
Software testing
statistical testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Model of Code Sharing for Estimating Software Failure on Demand Probabilities · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1995 |
Software testing
test adequacy |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | A Model of Code Sharing for Estimating Software Failure on Demand Probabilities · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1995 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
white-box testing · 0.0statistical analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | New Statistics for Demand-Based Software Testing
John H. R. May, A. D. Lunn |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 2 |
| 1995 | A Model of Code Sharing for Estimating Software Failure on Demand ProbabilitiesabstractA statistical software testing model is proposed in which white box factors have a role. The model combines test adequacy notions with statistical analysis, and in so doing provides a rudimentary treatment of dependencies between test results caused by the execution of common code during the tests. The model is used to estimate the probability of failure on demand for software performing safety shutdown functions on large plants and concerns the case where extensive test results are available on the latest version of the software, none of which have resulted in software failure. According to the model, there are circumstances in which some current statistical models for dynamic software testing are too conservative, and others are not conservative, depending on the software architecture.> John H. R. May, A. D. Lunn |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |